One month follow-up outcomes of a transdermal alcohol concentration-based contingency management intervention to reduce heavy drinking among driving while intoxicated arrestees.

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak, Richard J Lamb, John D Roache, Tae-Joon Moon, Yuanyuan Liang, Donald M Dougherty
{"title":"One month follow-up outcomes of a transdermal alcohol concentration-based contingency management intervention to reduce heavy drinking among driving while intoxicated arrestees.","authors":"Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak, Richard J Lamb, John D Roache, Tae-Joon Moon, Yuanyuan Liang, Donald M Dougherty","doi":"10.1111/acer.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rates of driving while intoxicated persist, and recidivism is common. Recently, we demonstrated that 8 weeks of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC)-based contingency management (CM) reduced heavy drinking (≥5 [men] or ≥4 [women] standard drinks) in 145 DWI arrestees under pretrial supervision. Here, we report 1-month (postintervention) follow-up outcomes for a subgroup of participants who were not Mandated to wear transdermal alcohol monitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the intervention, Non-Mandated participants (n = 100, 69%) returned for a 1-month follow-up visit and self-reported drinking during the previous month. Also, a fingerstick blood sample was used to measure the alcohol use biomarker phosphatidylethanol (PEth). PEth was measured by HPLC-MS/MS, with levels <20 ng/mL indicating low or no drinking. Multiple logistic regression models compared drinking outcomes (≤1 drinking day or ≤1 heavy drinking day) between the CM and Control groups (controlling for age, sex, White/non-White and drinking frequency prior to study entry).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses showed that CM group participants were more likely to self-report ≤1 day of any drinking than those in the Control group (OR = 3.07, p = 0.03) and more likely to have ≤1 heavy drinking (OR = 4.13, p = 0.04). PEth results were consistent with the self-report, even though a nonsignificant trend toward a greater likelihood of having PEth levels <20 ng/mL was observed in the CM compared with the control group (OR = 2.29, p = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes observed after an 8-week TAC-based CM intervention appeared to persist for 1 month after a TAC-based CM intervention. Participants in the CM intervention group were more likely to have fewer drinking days and fewer heavy drinking days, as evidenced by self-reported drinking that was consistent with PEth levels <20 ng/mL.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High rates of driving while intoxicated persist, and recidivism is common. Recently, we demonstrated that 8 weeks of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC)-based contingency management (CM) reduced heavy drinking (≥5 [men] or ≥4 [women] standard drinks) in 145 DWI arrestees under pretrial supervision. Here, we report 1-month (postintervention) follow-up outcomes for a subgroup of participants who were not Mandated to wear transdermal alcohol monitors.

Methods: After the intervention, Non-Mandated participants (n = 100, 69%) returned for a 1-month follow-up visit and self-reported drinking during the previous month. Also, a fingerstick blood sample was used to measure the alcohol use biomarker phosphatidylethanol (PEth). PEth was measured by HPLC-MS/MS, with levels <20 ng/mL indicating low or no drinking. Multiple logistic regression models compared drinking outcomes (≤1 drinking day or ≤1 heavy drinking day) between the CM and Control groups (controlling for age, sex, White/non-White and drinking frequency prior to study entry).

Results: Analyses showed that CM group participants were more likely to self-report ≤1 day of any drinking than those in the Control group (OR = 3.07, p = 0.03) and more likely to have ≤1 heavy drinking (OR = 4.13, p = 0.04). PEth results were consistent with the self-report, even though a nonsignificant trend toward a greater likelihood of having PEth levels <20 ng/mL was observed in the CM compared with the control group (OR = 2.29, p = 0.11).

Conclusions: Outcomes observed after an 8-week TAC-based CM intervention appeared to persist for 1 month after a TAC-based CM intervention. Participants in the CM intervention group were more likely to have fewer drinking days and fewer heavy drinking days, as evidenced by self-reported drinking that was consistent with PEth levels <20 ng/mL.

背景:醉酒驾驶的比例居高不下,且屡教不改。最近,我们证实,对 145 名接受审前监督的醉酒驾车被捕者进行为期 8 周、基于透皮酒精浓度(TAC)的应急管理(CM),可减少其大量饮酒(≥5 [男性] 或≥4 [女性] 标准酒量)。在此,我们报告了非强制佩戴透皮酒精监测仪的参与者分组的 1 个月(干预后)跟踪结果:干预结束后,非强制参与者(n = 100,69%)进行了为期 1 个月的随访,并自我报告了上个月的饮酒情况。此外,还采用指血样本测量酒精使用生物标志物磷脂酰乙醇(PEth)。PEth通过高效液相色谱-质谱/质谱联用仪进行测定,结果显示:CM组参与者的PEth水平高于CM组:分析表明,与对照组相比,CM 组参与者更有可能自我报告≤1 天饮酒(OR = 3.07,p = 0.03),更有可能≤1 次大量饮酒(OR = 4.13,p = 0.04)。PEth的结果与自我报告一致,尽管PEth水平较高的可能性呈不显著趋势:在进行为期 8 周的基于 TAC 的 CM 干预后观察到的结果似乎在进行基于 TAC 的 CM 干预 1 个月后仍然存在。CM干预组的参与者更有可能减少酗酒天数和重度酗酒天数,自我报告的酗酒情况与PEth水平一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信