Dispersed bacterial cellulose (DBC) alone graft material and adding DBC or the boric acid-absorbed DBC to xenograft increases the new bone formation during rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation- a pilot study.
{"title":"Dispersed bacterial cellulose (DBC) alone graft material and adding DBC or the boric acid-absorbed DBC to xenograft increases the new bone formation during rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation- a pilot study.","authors":"Songül Cömert Kiliç, Murat Özdal, Nihat Kiliç, Onur Ceylan, Gönül Koç","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of bone grafting materials, including xenograft alone, DBC alone, xenograft + DBC, xenograft + boric acid, and xenograft + boric acid-absorbed DBC, on the newly formed bone, the immune reactivity score of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Receptor Activator Nuclear Kappa-B Ligand (RANKL) and the OPG/RANKL ratio by histological, histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis in rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) model. Fourteen maxillary sinuses of New Zealand albino rabbits were augmented. Five groups were formed: xenograft alone (group1), dispersed bacterial cellulose (DBC) alone (group2), xenograft + DBC (group3), xenograft + boric acid (group4), xenograft +boric acid-absorbed DBC (group5). Eight weeks later, the species were examined. SEM, XRD, and FTIR analyses were carried out for DBC and boric acid-absorbed DBC. Inter-group comparisons were carried out by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for the immune reactivity score of OPG and RANKL and the independent sample t-test for OPG/RANKL ratio. The highest newly formed bone was observed in groups 3 and 5, and the lowest was in group 1. The percentages of newly formed bone area from highest to lowest occurred at 43.3 %, 38.3 %, 33.3 %, 30 %, and 19.5 % in groups 5, 3, 4, 2, and 1, respectively. Increased expression of OPG and RANKL was observed around newly formed bone areas in all groups. The immune reactivity score of OPG and RANKL expression was highest in group 5 and lowest in group 1, with no significant difference between the groups. The OPG/RANKL ratio was 1 in all groups, except the ratio was > 1 in only group 5, with no significant difference between the groups. The surface of DBC showed a well-organized, irregular, and interconnected porous structure. DBC found a biocompatible material. Boric acid-absorbed DBC produced a more remarkable and enlarged pore structure than DBC alone. The findings of the present pilot study indicated that DBC alone can be used as a scaffold and it seems an innovative bone graft material to filling bone defect areas that it caused enhanced bone regeneration during MSA. Moreover, adding DBC or boric acid-absorbed DBC to xenograft increased newly formed bone significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of bone grafting materials, including xenograft alone, DBC alone, xenograft + DBC, xenograft + boric acid, and xenograft + boric acid-absorbed DBC, on the newly formed bone, the immune reactivity score of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Receptor Activator Nuclear Kappa-B Ligand (RANKL) and the OPG/RANKL ratio by histological, histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis in rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) model. Fourteen maxillary sinuses of New Zealand albino rabbits were augmented. Five groups were formed: xenograft alone (group1), dispersed bacterial cellulose (DBC) alone (group2), xenograft + DBC (group3), xenograft + boric acid (group4), xenograft +boric acid-absorbed DBC (group5). Eight weeks later, the species were examined. SEM, XRD, and FTIR analyses were carried out for DBC and boric acid-absorbed DBC. Inter-group comparisons were carried out by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for the immune reactivity score of OPG and RANKL and the independent sample t-test for OPG/RANKL ratio. The highest newly formed bone was observed in groups 3 and 5, and the lowest was in group 1. The percentages of newly formed bone area from highest to lowest occurred at 43.3 %, 38.3 %, 33.3 %, 30 %, and 19.5 % in groups 5, 3, 4, 2, and 1, respectively. Increased expression of OPG and RANKL was observed around newly formed bone areas in all groups. The immune reactivity score of OPG and RANKL expression was highest in group 5 and lowest in group 1, with no significant difference between the groups. The OPG/RANKL ratio was 1 in all groups, except the ratio was > 1 in only group 5, with no significant difference between the groups. The surface of DBC showed a well-organized, irregular, and interconnected porous structure. DBC found a biocompatible material. Boric acid-absorbed DBC produced a more remarkable and enlarged pore structure than DBC alone. The findings of the present pilot study indicated that DBC alone can be used as a scaffold and it seems an innovative bone graft material to filling bone defect areas that it caused enhanced bone regeneration during MSA. Moreover, adding DBC or boric acid-absorbed DBC to xenograft increased newly formed bone significantly.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.