Examining the Impact of Availability and Accessibility of Community Benefit Provisions on County Health Outcomes.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S492160
Jinyoung Cha, Ahreum Han, Keon-Hyung Lee
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Availability and Accessibility of Community Benefit Provisions on County Health Outcomes.","authors":"Jinyoung Cha, Ahreum Han, Keon-Hyung Lee","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S492160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent rise of accountability in healthcare providers has spurred a keen interest in improving community benefit provisions and how these are associated with community health development. However, prior studies predominantly focus on the adequate amount of community benefit provisions (availability), disregarding the potential influence of distributional provisions (accessibility). To fill this gap, this study explores how the total amount (availability) and Blau's Index (accessibility) of community benefits are positively associated with county health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopts a cross-sectional time series two-way fixed effect analysis from 2014 to 2019 for the county level. Independent variables are calculated as the total amount and Blau's Index of community benefit provisions in hospital referral regions (HRRs). Dependent variables are county health outcomes, measured by physical and mental unhealthy days and distress days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that both the availability and accessibility of community benefit provisions are correlated with lower physical and mental healthy days and distress. Remarkably, the accessibility of community benefit provisions by hospitals became pivotal to improving county health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the theoretical aspects, it provides empirical evidence between community benefit provisions and community health outcomes and extends the theory of access into community benefit provisions. From the practical aspects, it offers invaluable insights for hospital managers and policymakers for their strategic decision-making to contribute to community health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"963-974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S492160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recent rise of accountability in healthcare providers has spurred a keen interest in improving community benefit provisions and how these are associated with community health development. However, prior studies predominantly focus on the adequate amount of community benefit provisions (availability), disregarding the potential influence of distributional provisions (accessibility). To fill this gap, this study explores how the total amount (availability) and Blau's Index (accessibility) of community benefits are positively associated with county health outcomes.

Methods: This study adopts a cross-sectional time series two-way fixed effect analysis from 2014 to 2019 for the county level. Independent variables are calculated as the total amount and Blau's Index of community benefit provisions in hospital referral regions (HRRs). Dependent variables are county health outcomes, measured by physical and mental unhealthy days and distress days.

Results: The results demonstrated that both the availability and accessibility of community benefit provisions are correlated with lower physical and mental healthy days and distress. Remarkably, the accessibility of community benefit provisions by hospitals became pivotal to improving county health outcomes.

Conclusion: From the theoretical aspects, it provides empirical evidence between community benefit provisions and community health outcomes and extends the theory of access into community benefit provisions. From the practical aspects, it offers invaluable insights for hospital managers and policymakers for their strategic decision-making to contribute to community health outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信