From Inquiry to Insight: Unlocking the Potential of Students' Questions in Medical Education in Singapore.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Amanda Huee-Ping Wong, Lik-Wei Wong, Shing Chuan Hooi, Shuh Shing Lee
{"title":"From Inquiry to Insight: Unlocking the Potential of Students' Questions in Medical Education in Singapore.","authors":"Amanda Huee-Ping Wong, Lik-Wei Wong, Shing Chuan Hooi, Shuh Shing Lee","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2025.2481400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Question-asking serves as a fundamental tool for active learning, allowing students to articulate uncertainties, link concepts, and refine their understanding. Despite its recognized value, the potential of student-generated questions in medical education remains underexplored, particularly in Asian academic settings where sociocultural norms may discourage students from speaking up in classroom discussions. Research on students' questions has overlooked their application as a resource for understanding cognitive engagement and identifying problem areas in student learning. This study, conducted at the National University of Singapore, addresses this gap by exploring student-generated questions as a lens into cognitive engagement with course content. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A content analysis approach was used to classify questions submitted anonymously by first-year medical students via a shared question-and-answer document embedded in the self-directed learning segment of a cardiovascular physiology course. Questions were categorized by cognitive levels using the revised Bloom's taxonomy, which provides a structured framework for assessing cognitive complexity. A chapter-based analysis examined question distribution across content areas to identify patterns in topic-specific inquiry. Two independent raters performed the classification, reaching an inter-rater agreement of 83.2%. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two-hundred ninety-eight (298) questions were analyzed, with most categorized at the 'Understand' (56%) and 'Apply' (29%) levels. This distribution closely aligns with the educational objectives of the self-directed learning segment and foundational medical curriculum, which prioritize comprehension and practical application. Slight variations across cognitive levels, particularly in higher-order categories, suggest that the nature of certain topics or instructional activities may promote deeper engagement. Question frequency was not uniformly distributed across topics, with electrocardiogram and clinical examination topics eliciting the most questions, likely due to the foundational relevance and integration with subsequent teaching activities. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Incorporating opportunities for question-asking within the curriculum is a promising strategy for examining students' cognitive engagement in medical education. The prevalence of 'Understand' and 'Apply' questions highlights a strong engagement pattern aligned with early-stage medical education, while chapter-based trends suggest topic complexity or instructional activities may influence question-asking patterns. By systematically analyzing student-generated questions, this study provides a structured means of assessing how students engage with course content at different cognitive levels. These insights can be used to inform instructional strategies that better support student engagement, allowing educators to refine teaching approaches according to learners' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2025.2481400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Question-asking serves as a fundamental tool for active learning, allowing students to articulate uncertainties, link concepts, and refine their understanding. Despite its recognized value, the potential of student-generated questions in medical education remains underexplored, particularly in Asian academic settings where sociocultural norms may discourage students from speaking up in classroom discussions. Research on students' questions has overlooked their application as a resource for understanding cognitive engagement and identifying problem areas in student learning. This study, conducted at the National University of Singapore, addresses this gap by exploring student-generated questions as a lens into cognitive engagement with course content. Methods: A content analysis approach was used to classify questions submitted anonymously by first-year medical students via a shared question-and-answer document embedded in the self-directed learning segment of a cardiovascular physiology course. Questions were categorized by cognitive levels using the revised Bloom's taxonomy, which provides a structured framework for assessing cognitive complexity. A chapter-based analysis examined question distribution across content areas to identify patterns in topic-specific inquiry. Two independent raters performed the classification, reaching an inter-rater agreement of 83.2%. Results: Two-hundred ninety-eight (298) questions were analyzed, with most categorized at the 'Understand' (56%) and 'Apply' (29%) levels. This distribution closely aligns with the educational objectives of the self-directed learning segment and foundational medical curriculum, which prioritize comprehension and practical application. Slight variations across cognitive levels, particularly in higher-order categories, suggest that the nature of certain topics or instructional activities may promote deeper engagement. Question frequency was not uniformly distributed across topics, with electrocardiogram and clinical examination topics eliciting the most questions, likely due to the foundational relevance and integration with subsequent teaching activities. Discussion: Incorporating opportunities for question-asking within the curriculum is a promising strategy for examining students' cognitive engagement in medical education. The prevalence of 'Understand' and 'Apply' questions highlights a strong engagement pattern aligned with early-stage medical education, while chapter-based trends suggest topic complexity or instructional activities may influence question-asking patterns. By systematically analyzing student-generated questions, this study provides a structured means of assessing how students engage with course content at different cognitive levels. These insights can be used to inform instructional strategies that better support student engagement, allowing educators to refine teaching approaches according to learners' needs.

从探究到洞察:释放新加坡医学教育中学生提问的潜能。
背景:提问是主动学习的基本工具,允许学生阐明不确定性,联系概念,并完善他们的理解。尽管具有公认的价值,但学生提出问题在医学教育中的潜力仍未得到充分发掘,特别是在亚洲的学术环境中,社会文化规范可能会阻止学生在课堂讨论中发言。对学生问题的研究忽视了它们作为理解认知参与和识别学生学习中问题领域的资源的应用。新加坡国立大学进行的这项研究,通过探索学生提出的问题,作为对课程内容认知参与的一个镜头,解决了这一差距。方法:采用内容分析方法对一年级医学生匿名提交的问题进行分类,这些问题通过嵌入在心血管生理学课程自主学习部分的共享问答文件提交。根据认知水平对问题进行分类,使用经过修订的Bloom分类法,该分类法为评估认知复杂性提供了一个结构化的框架。基于章节的分析检查了跨内容区域的问题分布,以确定特定主题查询的模式。两名独立的评价者进行了分类,评价者之间的一致性为83.2%。结果:我们分析了298个问题,其中大多数被归类为“理解”(56%)和“应用”(29%)两个级别。这种分布与自主学习部分和基础医学课程的教育目标密切一致,优先考虑理解和实际应用。认知水平之间的细微差异,特别是在高阶类别中,表明某些主题或教学活动的性质可能会促进更深层次的参与。问题频率在各个主题之间的分布并不均匀,心电图和临床检查主题引发的问题最多,可能是由于与后续教学活动的基础相关性和整合。讨论:在课程中加入提问的机会是检验学生在医学教育中的认知参与的一种很有前途的策略。“理解”和“应用”问题的流行突出了与早期医学教育相一致的强烈参与模式,而基于章节的趋势表明主题复杂性或教学活动可能会影响提问模式。通过系统地分析学生提出的问题,本研究提供了一种结构化的方法来评估学生如何在不同的认知水平上参与课程内容。这些见解可以用来为更好地支持学生参与的教学策略提供信息,使教育工作者能够根据学习者的需求改进教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信