Evaluation of the Acute Basic Palliation Concept by Relatives and Health Care Professionals: An Observational Study of 40 Home-Dying Patients in Denmark.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0062
Dorte Melgaard, Mike B Astorp, Johannes Riis, Inez Madeleine Jensen, Anne Louise Hartvig Skalborg, Matilde Alida Arendt Eriksen, Camilla Ly, Bensu Izgi, Line Elise Møller Hansen, Anne Lund Krarup
{"title":"Evaluation of the Acute Basic Palliation Concept by Relatives and Health Care Professionals: An Observational Study of 40 Home-Dying Patients in Denmark.","authors":"Dorte Melgaard, Mike B Astorp, Johannes Riis, Inez Madeleine Jensen, Anne Louise Hartvig Skalborg, Matilde Alida Arendt Eriksen, Camilla Ly, Bensu Izgi, Line Elise Møller Hansen, Anne Lund Krarup","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Many individuals prefer to pass away in the comfort of their own homes, yet logistical obstacles often result in their admission to hospitals for end-of-life care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To measure the effectiveness, as assessed by relatives and staff, of end-of-life care according to the acute basic palliation concept (ABPC) for patients discharged from an emergency department. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An observational study of 40 consecutive actively dying patients who were discharged from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, using the ABPC. Effectiveness of end-of-life care was measured by questionnaires to relatives, discharging doctors and nurses, and municipality health staff. The ABPC comprised a physician checklist, instructions for medical professionals, a medication template to be personalized, an added standardized text to discharge papers, information pamphlets for patients and relatives, and a box of medicine and utensils. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 40 included patients (mean age 84, standard deviation [SD] 7.7), four experienced improvements at home and resumed active treatment. The patients who died had an average survival time of 3.8 days (SD 7.5). According to relatives, 90% of patients died a dignified death without suffering. Municipality nurses rated the usefulness of the ABPC at 96 (interquartile range 88; 100) on a 0-100 scale, and all health care staff wanted to use the ABPC again. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The ABPC showed great potential as a tool for discharging dying patients without specialized palliative needs to good-quality end-of-life care at home. The ABPC was widely accepted by relatives and all health staff. The ABCP is ready for large-scale testing with patient subgroups and economic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"6-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many individuals prefer to pass away in the comfort of their own homes, yet logistical obstacles often result in their admission to hospitals for end-of-life care. Objectives: To measure the effectiveness, as assessed by relatives and staff, of end-of-life care according to the acute basic palliation concept (ABPC) for patients discharged from an emergency department. Methods: An observational study of 40 consecutive actively dying patients who were discharged from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, using the ABPC. Effectiveness of end-of-life care was measured by questionnaires to relatives, discharging doctors and nurses, and municipality health staff. The ABPC comprised a physician checklist, instructions for medical professionals, a medication template to be personalized, an added standardized text to discharge papers, information pamphlets for patients and relatives, and a box of medicine and utensils. Results: Among the 40 included patients (mean age 84, standard deviation [SD] 7.7), four experienced improvements at home and resumed active treatment. The patients who died had an average survival time of 3.8 days (SD 7.5). According to relatives, 90% of patients died a dignified death without suffering. Municipality nurses rated the usefulness of the ABPC at 96 (interquartile range 88; 100) on a 0-100 scale, and all health care staff wanted to use the ABPC again. Conclusion: The ABPC showed great potential as a tool for discharging dying patients without specialized palliative needs to good-quality end-of-life care at home. The ABPC was widely accepted by relatives and all health staff. The ABCP is ready for large-scale testing with patient subgroups and economic analysis.

亲属和医护人员对急性基本姑息概念的评价:丹麦40名居家死亡患者的观察研究
背景:许多人更喜欢在自己舒适的家中去世,然而后勤障碍往往导致他们入院接受临终关怀。目的:衡量由家属和工作人员评估的急诊出院患者根据急性基本姑息概念(ABPC)进行临终关怀的有效性。方法:采用ABPC对丹麦奥尔堡大学医院40例连续出院的积极死亡患者进行观察性研究。通过对家属、出院医生和护士以及市政卫生人员的问卷调查来衡量临终关怀的有效性。ABPC包括一份医生检查清单、医疗专业人员的说明、一份个性化的药物模板、出院文件的附加标准化文本、给病人和家属的信息小册子,以及一箱药品和器具。结果:纳入的40例患者(平均年龄84岁,标准差[SD] 7.7)中,4例患者在家中得到改善并恢复积极治疗。死亡患者的平均生存时间为3.8天(SD 7.5)。根据家属的说法,90%的病人在没有痛苦的情况下有尊严地死去。市政护士对ABPC的有用性评价为96(四分位数范围为88;100)在0-100的范围内,所有卫生保健人员都想再次使用ABPC。结论:ABPC作为无特殊姑息治疗需要的临终病人在家中进行高质量临终关怀的工具具有很大的潜力。ABPC被亲属和所有卫生工作人员广泛接受。ABCP已准备好进行患者亚组的大规模试验和经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信