Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Voice Handicap Index-10 With Item Response Theory.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/lary.32161
Elliana Kirsh DeVore, Thomas L Carroll, Maria Edelen, Clark Rosen, Jennifer J Shin
{"title":"Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Voice Handicap Index-10 With Item Response Theory.","authors":"Elliana Kirsh DeVore, Thomas L Carroll, Maria Edelen, Clark Rosen, Jennifer J Shin","doi":"10.1002/lary.32161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess: (1) the Voice Handicap-10 (VHI) instrument with item response theory (IRT) and determine which items convey the most information, (2) the extent to which voice handicap can be measured with a subset of items for efficient information intake, and (3) whether a proposed shorter scale has differing discriminatory ability for key diagnoses made by fellowship-trained laryngologists, as compared to the 10-item instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from 3640 patients who completed the VHI-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analysis provided discrimination and location parameters associated with each item. Residual item correlations were also assessed to assess redundant information. Based on these results, two 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for findings from videolaryngoscopy/stroboscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.55 to 4.68, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, potential 5-item subsets were proposed, which preserved the capacity to reflect underlying voice handicap assessment. ROC-AUC analyses suggested no significant difference between the 5-item subset and 10-item instrument with regard to their ability to discriminate whether findings such as vocal fold paralysis were present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRT data distinguished items for a proposed 5-item subset of the 10-item instrument, with the goal of reflecting the latent trait without significant loss of discrimination and precision.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2-Prospective validation study with reference standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess: (1) the Voice Handicap-10 (VHI) instrument with item response theory (IRT) and determine which items convey the most information, (2) the extent to which voice handicap can be measured with a subset of items for efficient information intake, and (3) whether a proposed shorter scale has differing discriminatory ability for key diagnoses made by fellowship-trained laryngologists, as compared to the 10-item instrument.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from 3640 patients who completed the VHI-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analysis provided discrimination and location parameters associated with each item. Residual item correlations were also assessed to assess redundant information. Based on these results, two 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for findings from videolaryngoscopy/stroboscopy.

Results: Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.55 to 4.68, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, potential 5-item subsets were proposed, which preserved the capacity to reflect underlying voice handicap assessment. ROC-AUC analyses suggested no significant difference between the 5-item subset and 10-item instrument with regard to their ability to discriminate whether findings such as vocal fold paralysis were present.

Conclusions: IRT data distinguished items for a proposed 5-item subset of the 10-item instrument, with the goal of reflecting the latent trait without significant loss of discrimination and precision.

Level of evidence: Level 2-Prospective validation study with reference standard.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信