'She didn't know what to do with me': The experience of seeking community mental health support after spinal cord injury.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine A Finlay, Phoebe Brook-Rowland, Margaret Tilley
{"title":"'She didn't know what to do with me': The experience of seeking community mental health support after spinal cord injury.","authors":"Katherine A Finlay, Phoebe Brook-Rowland, Margaret Tilley","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2479957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objectives: </strong>Adults with spinal cord injury in the UK do not currently have specialized access to SCI-informed community-based mental health support, despite their elevated risk of mental health decline. The lack of SCI-informed therapeutic support may increase the likelihood of mental health treatment failure. This study sought to qualitatively explore the experience of accessing, or attempting to access, generic (non-SCI-informed) mental health support when living with a spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, exploratory study using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based sample in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty people with spinal cord injury (10 female, 10 male) were recruited from a UK-based, SCI-specific support charity.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Semi-structured interviews (mean length = 83 min, SD = 13.5 min).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>9-item semi-structured interview schedule, addressing mental health service use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified: (1) Therapeutic timeliness; (2) A disconnect with standard services; and (3) Successful systems for support. The inpatient-to-outpatient transition represents a critical time window during which mental health is vulnerable to decline, requiring responsive access to mental health services throughout the lifespan. The lack of tailored, SCI-informed mental health services inhibits therapeutic engagement and limits perceived treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Without SCI-informed care, generic mental health service referrals risk early termination of support and treatment disengagement. Mental health treatment withdrawal is initiated by both patients and their allocated healthcare professionals. This study demonstrates an evident need to develop programs for people with SCI to train as (peer) mental health practitioners, and to develop SCI-specific training modules for mental health care practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2479957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context/objectives: Adults with spinal cord injury in the UK do not currently have specialized access to SCI-informed community-based mental health support, despite their elevated risk of mental health decline. The lack of SCI-informed therapeutic support may increase the likelihood of mental health treatment failure. This study sought to qualitatively explore the experience of accessing, or attempting to access, generic (non-SCI-informed) mental health support when living with a spinal cord injury.

Design: Qualitative, exploratory study using thematic analysis.

Setting: Community-based sample in the UK.

Participants: Twenty people with spinal cord injury (10 female, 10 male) were recruited from a UK-based, SCI-specific support charity.

Interventions: Semi-structured interviews (mean length = 83 min, SD = 13.5 min).

Outcome measures: 9-item semi-structured interview schedule, addressing mental health service use.

Results: Three themes were identified: (1) Therapeutic timeliness; (2) A disconnect with standard services; and (3) Successful systems for support. The inpatient-to-outpatient transition represents a critical time window during which mental health is vulnerable to decline, requiring responsive access to mental health services throughout the lifespan. The lack of tailored, SCI-informed mental health services inhibits therapeutic engagement and limits perceived treatment outcomes.

Conclusions: Without SCI-informed care, generic mental health service referrals risk early termination of support and treatment disengagement. Mental health treatment withdrawal is initiated by both patients and their allocated healthcare professionals. This study demonstrates an evident need to develop programs for people with SCI to train as (peer) mental health practitioners, and to develop SCI-specific training modules for mental health care practitioners.

“她不知道该拿我怎么办”:脊髓损伤后寻求社区精神健康支持的经历。
背景/目的:在英国,脊髓损伤的成年人目前没有专门的途径获得了解sci的社区心理健康支持,尽管他们的心理健康下降的风险较高。缺乏关于sci的治疗支持可能会增加心理健康治疗失败的可能性。本研究旨在定性地探讨脊髓损伤患者获得或试图获得一般(非sci知情)心理健康支持的经验。设计:采用主题分析的定性探索性研究。背景:以社区为基础的英国样本。参与者:20名脊髓损伤患者(10名女性,10名男性)从英国一家专门支持sci的慈善机构招募。干预措施:半结构化访谈(平均长度= 83分钟,标准差= 13.5分钟)。结果测量:9项半结构化访谈时间表,解决心理健康服务的使用。结果:确定了三个主题:(1)治疗时效性;(2)与标准服务脱节;(3)成功的支持系统。住院到门诊的过渡是一个关键的时间窗口,在此期间,心理健康很容易下降,需要在整个生命周期中及时获得心理健康服务。缺乏量身定制的、了解sci的心理健康服务抑制了治疗参与,限制了治疗结果。结论:没有scii知情的护理,一般的精神卫生服务转诊有早期终止支持和治疗脱离的风险。心理健康治疗的退出是由患者和分配给他们的保健专业人员共同发起的。本研究表明,有必要为脊髓损伤患者制定培训(同伴)心理健康从业人员的计划,并为心理健康从业人员开发针对脊髓损伤的培训模块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信