Priming with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation followed by robotic exoskeleton gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A case series.
{"title":"Priming with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation followed by robotic exoskeleton gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A case series.","authors":"Marcie Kern, Catherine Velasquez-Ignacio, Taimoor Afzal, Shih-Chiao Tseng, Gerard E Francisco, Shuo-Hsiu Chang","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2479955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the safety and feasibility of repeated transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) as priming strategy during exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training in individuals with SCI and evaluate potential neurophysiologic and functional gait changes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series experimental design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research laboratory at a post-acute rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four participants with chronic incomplete SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Four participants with chronic incomplete SCI received three weeks of training consisting of two types of interventions after baseline (A): 20-minute tsDCS (anode or cathode) applied over the spinous processes of T10 followed by 20-minute exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training (B, B1, B2) and 20-minute exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training (C, C1, C2). Each phase consisted of five consecutive intervention sessions. Two participants underwent sequence A-B1-C-B2 and two sequence A-C1-B-C2. Soleus Hoffmann Reflex (H-reflex) and gait speed (10-m walk test) were assessed on the first and fifth days of training for each training type.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Adverse skin reactions or other events, H-reflex (Hmax/Mmax ratio), and gait speed (10-m walk test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No adverse events occurred. All participants tolerated tsDCS with no negative effects on their skin. Participants demonstrated varied responses in their H/M ratios after tsDCS followed by exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training as well as after exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training. No consistent pattern can be identified in this case series. Three participants showed an increase in gait speed after tsDCS combined with exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Noninvasive repeated spinal stimulation can safely be used in individuals with incomplete SCI. Further large-scale research is necessary to determine the efficacy of tsDCS for priming the spinal cord in facilitating recovery of gait in individuals with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2479955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the safety and feasibility of repeated transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) as priming strategy during exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training in individuals with SCI and evaluate potential neurophysiologic and functional gait changes.
Study design: Case series experimental design.
Setting: Research laboratory at a post-acute rehabilitation hospital.
Participants: Four participants with chronic incomplete SCI.
Interventions: Four participants with chronic incomplete SCI received three weeks of training consisting of two types of interventions after baseline (A): 20-minute tsDCS (anode or cathode) applied over the spinous processes of T10 followed by 20-minute exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training (B, B1, B2) and 20-minute exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training (C, C1, C2). Each phase consisted of five consecutive intervention sessions. Two participants underwent sequence A-B1-C-B2 and two sequence A-C1-B-C2. Soleus Hoffmann Reflex (H-reflex) and gait speed (10-m walk test) were assessed on the first and fifth days of training for each training type.
Outcome measures: Adverse skin reactions or other events, H-reflex (Hmax/Mmax ratio), and gait speed (10-m walk test).
Results: No adverse events occurred. All participants tolerated tsDCS with no negative effects on their skin. Participants demonstrated varied responses in their H/M ratios after tsDCS followed by exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training as well as after exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training. No consistent pattern can be identified in this case series. Three participants showed an increase in gait speed after tsDCS combined with exoskeleton-assisted locomotor training.
Conclusions: Noninvasive repeated spinal stimulation can safely be used in individuals with incomplete SCI. Further large-scale research is necessary to determine the efficacy of tsDCS for priming the spinal cord in facilitating recovery of gait in individuals with SCI.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.