Clinical validation of a rule-based decision tree algorithm for classifying hip movements in people with spinal cord injury.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Susanne Lillelund Sørensen, Matthijs Lipperts, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, Erhard Næss-Schmidt
{"title":"Clinical validation of a rule-based decision tree algorithm for classifying hip movements in people with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Susanne Lillelund Sørensen, Matthijs Lipperts, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, Erhard Næss-Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2472096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess a rule-based decision tree algorithm's performance for classifying and counting specific hip flexion repetitions in able-bodied people and to validate the algorithm's efficacy for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Alternative placement of the accelerometer was tested.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A validation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialized SCI center in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten able-bodied people and 10 people with SCI were recruited. All participants completed a 15-minute predefined protocol with the following movements: hip flexion in supine 90°, 45° and 20°, hip abduction, pelvic lift, transfer from supine to sitting, sit-to-stand, transfer to a wheelchair, pushed in a wheelchair, Motomed cycling, walking and steps in Nustep fitness trainer. All wore accelerometers on the thigh and a chest-mounted GoPro camera to establish ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confusion matrixes showed that able-bodied people's activities and specific hip movements can be classified and the number of repetitions counted with 0.86 accuracy. The algorithm's performance did not change substantially depending on the position of the accelerometer. For people with movement deficits caused by SCI, the accuracy lowered to 0.66 but could be improved to 0.79 for classifying and counting this population's activities/movements overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The algorithm tested could classify specific hip movements and other activities in the SCI population. This method using a single accelerometer may be applied in clinical trials for people with SCI to objectively assess the change in the number of repetitions over time of hip flexion movements, walking and sit-to-stand activities and to some extent hip abduction and pelvic lift.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05558254. Registered 28th September 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2472096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess a rule-based decision tree algorithm's performance for classifying and counting specific hip flexion repetitions in able-bodied people and to validate the algorithm's efficacy for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Alternative placement of the accelerometer was tested.

Study design: A validation study.

Setting: Specialized SCI center in Denmark.

Methods: Ten able-bodied people and 10 people with SCI were recruited. All participants completed a 15-minute predefined protocol with the following movements: hip flexion in supine 90°, 45° and 20°, hip abduction, pelvic lift, transfer from supine to sitting, sit-to-stand, transfer to a wheelchair, pushed in a wheelchair, Motomed cycling, walking and steps in Nustep fitness trainer. All wore accelerometers on the thigh and a chest-mounted GoPro camera to establish ground truth.

Results: Confusion matrixes showed that able-bodied people's activities and specific hip movements can be classified and the number of repetitions counted with 0.86 accuracy. The algorithm's performance did not change substantially depending on the position of the accelerometer. For people with movement deficits caused by SCI, the accuracy lowered to 0.66 but could be improved to 0.79 for classifying and counting this population's activities/movements overall.

Conclusion: The algorithm tested could classify specific hip movements and other activities in the SCI population. This method using a single accelerometer may be applied in clinical trials for people with SCI to objectively assess the change in the number of repetitions over time of hip flexion movements, walking and sit-to-stand activities and to some extent hip abduction and pelvic lift.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05558254. Registered 28th September 2022.

目的评估基于规则的决策树算法在对健全人的特定髋关节屈曲重复次数进行分类和计数方面的性能,并验证该算法对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的有效性。研究设计:一项验证性研究:研究设计:验证研究:研究设计:一项验证性研究:方法:招募 10 名健全人和 10 名 SCI 患者。所有参与者都完成了 15 分钟的预定方案,包括以下动作:仰卧位屈髋 90°、45° 和 20°、髋关节外展、骨盆上提、从仰卧位转为坐位、从坐位到站位、转到轮椅上、在轮椅上推、Motomed 自行车、Nustep 健身训练器中的步行和台阶。所有人都在大腿上佩戴了加速度计,并在胸前安装了 GoPro 摄像机,以建立地面实况:混淆矩阵显示,健全人的活动和特定髋关节动作可以分类,重复次数的计算准确率为 0.86。该算法的性能不会因加速度计的位置而发生重大变化。对于因 SCI 而导致运动障碍的人,准确率降低到 0.66,但在对这些人的整体活动/运动进行分类和计数时,准确率可提高到 0.79:结论:所测试的算法可以对 SCI 患者的特定髋关节运动和其他活动进行分类。这种使用单个加速度计的方法可应用于 SCI 患者的临床试验中,以客观评估髋关节屈曲运动、步行和坐立活动的重复次数随时间的变化,并在一定程度上评估髋关节外展和骨盆上提的重复次数:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05558254。注册日期:2022 年 9 月 28 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信