Process standardization of encounter labeling to characterize ambulatory care pharmacist activity.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Carly Gabriel, Clinical Pharmacist, Trisha A Miller, Jack Janosik, Stephanie L Ballard, Clinical Pharmacist, Deanne Hall
{"title":"Process standardization of encounter labeling to characterize ambulatory care pharmacist activity.","authors":"Carly Gabriel, Clinical Pharmacist, Trisha A Miller, Jack Janosik, Stephanie L Ballard, Clinical Pharmacist, Deanne Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2025.102396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structured documentation of pharmacist-provided patient care activities within the electronic medical record (EMR) is crucial for recording, continuity, billing, and collecting clinical outcome data. In chart notes, the encounter reason field allows multiple semi-structured or free-text entries to describe the purpose for a patient interaction. Without standardization, reason entries could not be pooled for analysis without additional chart review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim was to increase the utility of the encounter reason field by standardizing ambulatory care pharmacist encounter labeling and provide a template for adoption across a large academic health system. The resulting structured data is intended to better characterize pharmacist activity at individual, clinic and system levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A report collected encounter reason entries for pharmacist encounters in 4 primary care settings April-June 2022. After review, an ambulatory care pharmacist workgroup created a procedure for entering encounter reason, requiring entry of both an indication and an action or pharmacist service. Pharmacists were trained on the new procedure in August. A post- implementation report was repeated for September-Nov 2022. Presence and description of encounter reason entries were analyzed with descriptive statistics and presented for comparison between pre- and post-implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-implementation, 18.6% (n=370) of total encounters had a generic entry that did not define the visit indication or the pharmacists' activity. Post-implementation, generic entries decreased to 3.9% (n=88). After exclusion of anticoagulation encounters, the number of encounters with no reason decreased from 26.8% (n=252) to 12.1% (n=123). The number of encounters, unique patients, and disease states labeled did not change significantly from pre- to post- implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a procedure for labeling encounter reason allowed for more robust characterization of pharmacist services using congruent data across pharmacist practices. This approach may be useful for pharmacist practices with limited analytics resources for more sophisticated service metrics and dashboards.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":" ","pages":"102396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2025.102396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Structured documentation of pharmacist-provided patient care activities within the electronic medical record (EMR) is crucial for recording, continuity, billing, and collecting clinical outcome data. In chart notes, the encounter reason field allows multiple semi-structured or free-text entries to describe the purpose for a patient interaction. Without standardization, reason entries could not be pooled for analysis without additional chart review.

Objective: The primary aim was to increase the utility of the encounter reason field by standardizing ambulatory care pharmacist encounter labeling and provide a template for adoption across a large academic health system. The resulting structured data is intended to better characterize pharmacist activity at individual, clinic and system levels.

Methods: A report collected encounter reason entries for pharmacist encounters in 4 primary care settings April-June 2022. After review, an ambulatory care pharmacist workgroup created a procedure for entering encounter reason, requiring entry of both an indication and an action or pharmacist service. Pharmacists were trained on the new procedure in August. A post- implementation report was repeated for September-Nov 2022. Presence and description of encounter reason entries were analyzed with descriptive statistics and presented for comparison between pre- and post-implementation.

Results: Pre-implementation, 18.6% (n=370) of total encounters had a generic entry that did not define the visit indication or the pharmacists' activity. Post-implementation, generic entries decreased to 3.9% (n=88). After exclusion of anticoagulation encounters, the number of encounters with no reason decreased from 26.8% (n=252) to 12.1% (n=123). The number of encounters, unique patients, and disease states labeled did not change significantly from pre- to post- implementation.

Conclusion: Implementation of a procedure for labeling encounter reason allowed for more robust characterization of pharmacist services using congruent data across pharmacist practices. This approach may be useful for pharmacist practices with limited analytics resources for more sophisticated service metrics and dashboards.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信