Impact of an Extracurricular Research Course on Medical Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S509323
Jawad S Alnajjar, Razan Anwar Alabdulqader, Abdulmalek W Alhithlool, Mohammed A Almarzooq, Abdullah Afif Alshakhs, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Omair, Sayed Ibrahim Ali, Abdullah Almaqhawi
{"title":"Impact of an Extracurricular Research Course on Medical Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Jawad S Alnajjar, Razan Anwar Alabdulqader, Abdulmalek W Alhithlool, Mohammed A Almarzooq, Abdullah Afif Alshakhs, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Omair, Sayed Ibrahim Ali, Abdullah Almaqhawi","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S509323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research is a fundamental component for advancing healthcare and medical knowledge. It enhances students' ability to practice evidence-based care in clinical practice. Despite the recognized benefits, barriers such as lack of time, skills, funding, and guidance impede students' involvement in research. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of conducting a specialised extracurricular research course designed for medical students at King Faisal University.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study utilized a pretest-posttest design, including a control group. Participants were second-to-sixth-year medical students, divided into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group participated in a comprehensive research course over eight months. A pretest-posttest self-administered questionnaire was given at the beginning and end of the course to assess research knowledge and attitudes. The control group completed the same at equivalent time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired sample <i>t</i>-test demonstrated significant improvements in pre- and post-test scores for research knowledge among students who attended more than 50% of the course (p = 0.009). Similarly, students who attended less than or equal to 50% of the course content also showed significant gains in research knowledge (p = 0.005). However, the comparison between the intervention and control groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.160).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of a structured research training program in enhancing medical students' research knowledge and attitudes. The findings advocate for integrating formal research training into medical curricula to prepare future healthcare professionals for evidence-based practice and sustained research engagement. Despite limitations such as non-randomized assignments and a single-institution focus, the study underscores the transformative impact of systematic research education on medical students' professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"461-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S509323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research is a fundamental component for advancing healthcare and medical knowledge. It enhances students' ability to practice evidence-based care in clinical practice. Despite the recognized benefits, barriers such as lack of time, skills, funding, and guidance impede students' involvement in research. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of conducting a specialised extracurricular research course designed for medical students at King Faisal University.

Patients and methods: A quasi-experimental study utilized a pretest-posttest design, including a control group. Participants were second-to-sixth-year medical students, divided into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group participated in a comprehensive research course over eight months. A pretest-posttest self-administered questionnaire was given at the beginning and end of the course to assess research knowledge and attitudes. The control group completed the same at equivalent time points.

Results: The paired sample t-test demonstrated significant improvements in pre- and post-test scores for research knowledge among students who attended more than 50% of the course (p = 0.009). Similarly, students who attended less than or equal to 50% of the course content also showed significant gains in research knowledge (p = 0.005). However, the comparison between the intervention and control groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.160).

Conclusion: This study highlights the effectiveness of a structured research training program in enhancing medical students' research knowledge and attitudes. The findings advocate for integrating formal research training into medical curricula to prepare future healthcare professionals for evidence-based practice and sustained research engagement. Despite limitations such as non-randomized assignments and a single-institution focus, the study underscores the transformative impact of systematic research education on medical students' professional development.

课外研究课对医学生的影响:一项准实验研究
简介:研究是推进医疗保健和医学知识的基本组成部分。提高学生在临床实践中实践循证护理的能力。尽管有公认的好处,但缺乏时间、技能、资金和指导等障碍阻碍了学生参与研究。本研究旨在评估为费萨尔国王大学医学院学生开设的专门课外研究课程的有效性和影响。患者和方法:准实验研究采用前测后测设计,包括对照组。参与者是二到六年级的医学生,分为干预组和对照组。干预组参加了为期八个月的综合研究课程。在课程开始和结束时,分别发放了一份自我管理的前测后测问卷,以评估研究知识和态度。对照组在相同的时间点完成相同的治疗。结果:配对样本t检验显示,参加课程50%以上的学生在研究知识的测试前和测试后得分显著提高(p = 0.009)。同样,参加少于或等于50%课程内容的学生在研究知识方面也表现出显著的收获(p = 0.005)。干预组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.160)。结论:本研究强调了结构化研究训练计划在提高医学生研究知识和态度方面的有效性。研究结果主张将正式的研究培训纳入医学课程,为未来的医疗保健专业人员做好循证实践和持续研究参与的准备。尽管存在诸如非随机分配和单一机构重点等局限性,但该研究强调了系统研究教育对医学生专业发展的变革性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信