Accuracy in Invariance Detection With Multilevel Models With Three Estimators.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
W Holmes Finch, Cihan Demir, Brian F French, Thao Vo
{"title":"Accuracy in Invariance Detection With Multilevel Models With Three Estimators.","authors":"W Holmes Finch, Cihan Demir, Brian F French, Thao Vo","doi":"10.1177/01466216251325644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Applied and simulation studies document model convergence and accuracy issues in differential item functioning detection with multilevel models, hindering detection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various estimation techniques in addressing these issues and ensure robust DIF detection. We conducted a simulation study to investigate the performance of multilevel logistic regression models with predictors at level 2 across different estimation procedures, including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Bayesian estimation, and generalized estimating equations (GEE). The simulation results demonstrated that all maintained control over the Type I error rate across conditions. In most cases, GEE had comparable or higher power compared to MLE for identifying DIF, with Bayes having the lowest power. When potentially important covariates at levels-1 and 2 were included in the model, power for all methods was higher. These results suggest that in many cases where multilevel logistic regression is used for DIF detection, GEE offers a viable option for researchers and that including important contextual variables at all levels of the data is desirable. Implications for practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"01466216251325644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251325644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applied and simulation studies document model convergence and accuracy issues in differential item functioning detection with multilevel models, hindering detection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various estimation techniques in addressing these issues and ensure robust DIF detection. We conducted a simulation study to investigate the performance of multilevel logistic regression models with predictors at level 2 across different estimation procedures, including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Bayesian estimation, and generalized estimating equations (GEE). The simulation results demonstrated that all maintained control over the Type I error rate across conditions. In most cases, GEE had comparable or higher power compared to MLE for identifying DIF, with Bayes having the lowest power. When potentially important covariates at levels-1 and 2 were included in the model, power for all methods was higher. These results suggest that in many cases where multilevel logistic regression is used for DIF detection, GEE offers a viable option for researchers and that including important contextual variables at all levels of the data is desirable. Implications for practice are discussed.

具有三个估计量的多水平模型的不变性检测精度。
应用与仿真研究了多层次模型在差异项目功能检测中的收敛性和准确性问题。本研究旨在评估各种估计技术在解决这些问题和确保鲁棒DIF检测方面的有效性。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以研究具有2级预测因子的多水平逻辑回归模型在不同估计过程中的性能,包括最大似然估计(MLE)、贝叶斯估计和广义估计方程(GEE)。仿真结果表明,在各种条件下都能保持对I型错误率的控制。在大多数情况下,与MLE相比,GEE识别DIF的能力相当或更高,而贝叶斯的能力最低。当模型中包含level -1和level - 2的潜在重要协变量时,所有方法的有效性都更高。这些结果表明,在许多使用多水平逻辑回归进行DIF检测的情况下,GEE为研究人员提供了一个可行的选择,并且在所有水平的数据中包括重要的上下文变量是可取的。讨论了对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信