[Real-life study with pharmaceutical cannabidiol in refractory epilepsy]

Q3 Medicine
Luis Angel Di Giuseppe, Juan Ignacio Appendino, María Del Carmen García, Karina Elena Alvarez, Gabriela Buela, Mariana Andrea Burgos, María Lourdes Posadas-Martínez, Maria Celeste Puga
{"title":"[Real-life study with pharmaceutical cannabidiol in refractory epilepsy]","authors":"Luis Angel Di Giuseppe, Juan Ignacio Appendino, María Del Carmen García, Karina Elena Alvarez, Gabriela Buela, Mariana Andrea Burgos, María Lourdes Posadas-Martínez, Maria Celeste Puga","doi":"10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceutical-grade cannabidiol (CBD) is an alternative treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In 2022, the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires implemented a non-medical change (NMC) of treatment, replacing one commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product with another, the latter also being the initial option for new patients.</p><p><p>Our objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the commercial product change in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of DRE patients who either switched from one commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product to another or started treatment with the new product. The clinical response was evaluated by changes in seizure frequency, perception of change with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, and safety considering discontinuation and/or the presence of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were included, 12 in the change group and 7 in the new start group (7 pediatric and 12 adults). One patient discontinued treatment due to lack of response. Among those who completed follow-up, 8 (44%) reduced seizure frequency, 6 (33%) showed no change, and 4 (22%) increased seizure frequency. According to the PGIC scale, 9 (50%) remained unchanged, 5 (28%) reported barely noticeable changes, and 4 (22%) reported improvement. Adverse events were mild and transient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product is a safe and valid option both for substitution and initial treatment in patients with DRE. During the treatment period, patients perceived stability or improvement according to the PGIC scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":38814,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","volume":"82 1","pages":"110-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v82.n1.45350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceutical-grade cannabidiol (CBD) is an alternative treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In 2022, the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires implemented a non-medical change (NMC) of treatment, replacing one commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product with another, the latter also being the initial option for new patients.

Our objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the commercial product change in this population.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of DRE patients who either switched from one commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product to another or started treatment with the new product. The clinical response was evaluated by changes in seizure frequency, perception of change with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, and safety considering discontinuation and/or the presence of adverse effects.

Results: Nineteen patients were included, 12 in the change group and 7 in the new start group (7 pediatric and 12 adults). One patient discontinued treatment due to lack of response. Among those who completed follow-up, 8 (44%) reduced seizure frequency, 6 (33%) showed no change, and 4 (22%) increased seizure frequency. According to the PGIC scale, 9 (50%) remained unchanged, 5 (28%) reported barely noticeable changes, and 4 (22%) reported improvement. Adverse events were mild and transient.

Conclusion: The new commercial pharmaceutical-grade CBD product is a safe and valid option both for substitution and initial treatment in patients with DRE. During the treatment period, patients perceived stability or improvement according to the PGIC scale.

[药用大麻二酚治疗难治性癫痫的现实研究]
药用级大麻二酚(CBD)是耐药癫痫(DRE)患者的替代治疗方法。2022年,意大利布宜诺斯艾利斯医院实施了一项非医疗改变(NMC)治疗,用另一种商业制药级CBD产品取代了另一种产品,后者也是新患者的首选。我们的目的是评估商业产品变化在这一人群中的临床结果。方法:对从一种商业药物级CBD产品切换到另一种或开始使用新产品治疗的DRE患者进行回顾性队列研究。临床反应通过癫痫发作频率的变化、患者总体变化印象(PGIC)量表的变化感知以及考虑到停药和/或存在不良反应的安全性来评估。结果:纳入19例患者,其中12例为改变组,7例为新开始组(7例儿童,12例成人)。一名患者因缺乏反应而停止治疗。在完成随访的患者中,癫痫发作频率降低8例(44%),无变化6例(33%),癫痫发作频率增加4例(22%)。根据PGIC量表,9个(50%)保持不变,5个(28%)报告几乎没有明显变化,4个(22%)报告改善。不良事件轻微且短暂。结论:新的商业药用级CBD产品是DRE患者替代和初始治疗的安全有效的选择。在治疗期间,根据PGIC量表,患者感觉稳定或改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Faculty of Medical Sciences is a scientific publication of the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the National University of Cordoba. Its objective is to disseminate and promote research work related to Medical and Biological Sciences. It publishes scientific works of national and international professionals on different topics related to health sciences from the field of medicine, nursing, kinesiology, diagnostic imaging, phonoaudiology, nutrition, public health, chemical sciences, dentistry and related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信