Impacts of the diagnosis-intervention packet reform on costs and healthcare resource utilization: evidence from Guangzhou, China.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bingxue Fang, Yawen Jiang
{"title":"Impacts of the diagnosis-intervention packet reform on costs and healthcare resource utilization: evidence from Guangzhou, China.","authors":"Bingxue Fang, Yawen Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00615-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) payment reform, utilizing big data for patient classification and payment standardization, was initially developed and piloted in China. Guangzhou, the pilot mega-city, rolled out DIP payment reform in 2018 to regulate medical expenditures. We estimated the impacts of DIP on costs and healthcare resource utilization in Guangzhou using a nine-year panel data set of Guangzhou and other regions between 2018 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By employing the synthetic difference-in-difference (SDID) method, we captured changes in outcome variables before and after DIP implementation in Guangzhou and non-reforming regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DIP payment reform increased per-episode inpatient costs by CNY 1574.735 (95% CI: 148.330 to 3001.140, P < 0.05), CNY 1583.413 (95% CI: 247.356 to 2919.470, P < 0.05), and CNY 1448.065 (95% CI: -132.051 to 3028.181.140, P < 0.1) among all hospitals, public hospitals, and private hospitals, respectively. In contrast, DIP had little effect on the average length of stay (LOS) among all hospitals from 2018 to 2020. Although DIP did not impact in-hospital mortality (IHM) overall, it increased IHM by 0.330 percentage points (95% CI: 0.008 to 0.652, P < 0.05) and 0.311 percentage points (95% CI: 0.158 to 0.463, P < 0.01) among private hospitals and secondary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the effects of DIP payment reform were mixed. While it did increase healthcare costs, its impacts on quality and operation efficiency varied significantly across different types of hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00615-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) payment reform, utilizing big data for patient classification and payment standardization, was initially developed and piloted in China. Guangzhou, the pilot mega-city, rolled out DIP payment reform in 2018 to regulate medical expenditures. We estimated the impacts of DIP on costs and healthcare resource utilization in Guangzhou using a nine-year panel data set of Guangzhou and other regions between 2018 and 2020.

Methods: By employing the synthetic difference-in-difference (SDID) method, we captured changes in outcome variables before and after DIP implementation in Guangzhou and non-reforming regions.

Results: DIP payment reform increased per-episode inpatient costs by CNY 1574.735 (95% CI: 148.330 to 3001.140, P < 0.05), CNY 1583.413 (95% CI: 247.356 to 2919.470, P < 0.05), and CNY 1448.065 (95% CI: -132.051 to 3028.181.140, P < 0.1) among all hospitals, public hospitals, and private hospitals, respectively. In contrast, DIP had little effect on the average length of stay (LOS) among all hospitals from 2018 to 2020. Although DIP did not impact in-hospital mortality (IHM) overall, it increased IHM by 0.330 percentage points (95% CI: 0.008 to 0.652, P < 0.05) and 0.311 percentage points (95% CI: 0.158 to 0.463, P < 0.01) among private hospitals and secondary hospitals.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the effects of DIP payment reform were mixed. While it did increase healthcare costs, its impacts on quality and operation efficiency varied significantly across different types of hospitals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信