Efficacy of the transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation: Lux-Valve versus Lux-Valve Plus.

Q2 Medicine
Yandan Sun, Liang Cao, Wei Bai, Yuxi Li, Jian Yang, Guomeng Jiang, Yang Liu, Ping Jin, Liwen Liu, Xin Meng
{"title":"Efficacy of the transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation: Lux-Valve versus Lux-Valve Plus.","authors":"Yandan Sun, Liang Cao, Wei Bai, Yuxi Li, Jian Yang, Guomeng Jiang, Yang Liu, Ping Jin, Liwen Liu, Xin Meng","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) using Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 consecutive patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who underwent TTVR with Lux-Valve (<i>n</i>=14) or Lux-Valve Plus (<i>n</i>=14) in the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University from August 2019 to November 2023 were enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all the patients before and 6 months after TTVR. The ultrasound indexes were compared before and 6 months after TTVR in all patients and between Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced, and length postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Lux-Valve Plus group compared with those in the Lux-Valve group (both <i>P</i><0.05). Six months after TTVR, none of the patients exhibited more than mild tricuspid valve regurgitation, and none of the patients had moderate or above perivalvular leakage except for one patient in the Lux-Valve Plus group who had a separation of the clamping member from the anterior tricuspid leaflet. The incidence of perivalvular leakage was significantly lower in the Lux-Valve Plus group (14.29%, 2/14) compared with the Lux-Valve group (64.29%, 9/14, <i>P</i><0.05). At 6 months after operation, the right chamber volume and right ventricle middle transverse diameter were reduced; the peak blood flow velocity across the tricuspid valve, peak pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve, mean blood flow velocity of tricuspid valve, mean pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve and velocity time integral were increased in both groups (all <i>P</i><0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the Lux-Valve Plus group at 6 months postoperatively compared with the Lux-Valve group (<i>P</i><0.05), while the rest of the indicators were not statistically different between the groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of using Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus for TTVR in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation is comparable. Six months after TTVR, the right heart has undergone reverse remodeling. Although Lux-Valve Plus is more minimally invasive, the characteristics of the device and follow patient individualization should be taken into account when selecting a valve.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) using Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Methods: A total of 28 consecutive patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who underwent TTVR with Lux-Valve (n=14) or Lux-Valve Plus (n=14) in the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University from August 2019 to November 2023 were enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all the patients before and 6 months after TTVR. The ultrasound indexes were compared before and 6 months after TTVR in all patients and between Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus groups.

Results: Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced, and length postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Lux-Valve Plus group compared with those in the Lux-Valve group (both P<0.05). Six months after TTVR, none of the patients exhibited more than mild tricuspid valve regurgitation, and none of the patients had moderate or above perivalvular leakage except for one patient in the Lux-Valve Plus group who had a separation of the clamping member from the anterior tricuspid leaflet. The incidence of perivalvular leakage was significantly lower in the Lux-Valve Plus group (14.29%, 2/14) compared with the Lux-Valve group (64.29%, 9/14, P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the right chamber volume and right ventricle middle transverse diameter were reduced; the peak blood flow velocity across the tricuspid valve, peak pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve, mean blood flow velocity of tricuspid valve, mean pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve and velocity time integral were increased in both groups (all P<0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the Lux-Valve Plus group at 6 months postoperatively compared with the Lux-Valve group (P<0.05), while the rest of the indicators were not statistically different between the groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: The efficacy of using Lux-Valve and Lux-Valve Plus for TTVR in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation is comparable. Six months after TTVR, the right heart has undergone reverse remodeling. Although Lux-Valve Plus is more minimally invasive, the characteristics of the device and follow patient individualization should be taken into account when selecting a valve.

经导管三尖瓣置换术治疗严重三尖瓣反流的疗效:Lux-Valve vs Lux-Valve Plus
目的:比较Lux-Valve与Lux-Valve Plus经导管三尖瓣置换术(TTVR)治疗严重三尖瓣反流患者的疗效。方法:选取2019年8月至2023年11月在空军医科大学第一附属医院连续行Lux-Valve TTVR的严重三尖瓣反流患者28例(n=14)或Lux-Valve Plus (n=14)。所有患者均于TTVR术前及术后6个月行经胸超声心动图检查。比较所有患者在TTVR前和TTVR后6个月的超声指标以及Lux-Valve组和Lux-Valve Plus组之间的超声指标。结果:与luxvalve组相比,luxvalve Plus组术中出血明显减少,术后住院时间明显缩短(PPPPP均为0.05)。结论:luxv - valve与luxv - valve Plus治疗重度三尖瓣反流患者的TTVR疗效相当。TTVR术后6个月,右心发生逆向重构。虽然Lux-Valve Plus更具微创性,但在选择瓣膜时应考虑到设备的特点和患者的个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信