[Analysis of the actual protective effect and its influencing factors of respiratory protective equipment for trichloroethylene-exposed workers].

Q3 Medicine
Q F Huang, Y Y Zhang, Z D Zhao, W T Lin, J H He, Z P Li, X Zhong, X Luo, S B Su
{"title":"[Analysis of the actual protective effect and its influencing factors of respiratory protective equipment for trichloroethylene-exposed workers].","authors":"Q F Huang, Y Y Zhang, Z D Zhao, W T Lin, J H He, Z P Li, X Zhong, X Luo, S B Su","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240329-00128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To understand the current status of the actual protective effect of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) for workers exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE), and to explore the factors affecting the actual protective effect. <b>Methods:</b> From July to December 2023, a total of 75 workers occupationally exposed to TCE from 21 hardware and electronics manufacturing facilities in a province were selected as research objects by convenient sampling method. Workplace protection factor (WPF) was used as an index to evaluate the actual protective effect of workers' RPE. The concentration of TCE inside and outside the RPE was detected to calculate WPE, and the temperature, humidity and wind speed near the working place were measured, as well as the forced vital capacity, respiratory rate, heart rate and other indicators of the worker were measured. The log-transformed WPF value (lgWPF) followed a normal distribution. One-sample <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the difference between the mean lgWPF and the log value of the assigned protection factor (APF) of the half mask (lgAPF=1). Multiple linear regression model was used to investigate the influencing factors of lgWPF. <b>Results:</b> The lgWPF of 75 TCE-exposed workers ranged from 0.40 to 1.32 (0.84±0.22). The mean of lgWPF was lower than that of lgAPF, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>t</i>=-6.37, <i>P</i><0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the results of multiple linear regression showed that humidity, forced vital capacity and respiratory rate were negatively correlated with lgWPF (<i>β</i>=-0.008, -0.079, -0.021, <i>P</i><0.05) . <b>Conclusion:</b> The actual protective efficacy of RPE among workers exposed to TCE is suboptimal. High humidity, elevated forced vital capacity, and increased respiratory rate may be contributing factors to the diminished protective performance of RPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 3","pages":"170-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240329-00128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand the current status of the actual protective effect of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) for workers exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE), and to explore the factors affecting the actual protective effect. Methods: From July to December 2023, a total of 75 workers occupationally exposed to TCE from 21 hardware and electronics manufacturing facilities in a province were selected as research objects by convenient sampling method. Workplace protection factor (WPF) was used as an index to evaluate the actual protective effect of workers' RPE. The concentration of TCE inside and outside the RPE was detected to calculate WPE, and the temperature, humidity and wind speed near the working place were measured, as well as the forced vital capacity, respiratory rate, heart rate and other indicators of the worker were measured. The log-transformed WPF value (lgWPF) followed a normal distribution. One-sample t-test was used to compare the difference between the mean lgWPF and the log value of the assigned protection factor (APF) of the half mask (lgAPF=1). Multiple linear regression model was used to investigate the influencing factors of lgWPF. Results: The lgWPF of 75 TCE-exposed workers ranged from 0.40 to 1.32 (0.84±0.22). The mean of lgWPF was lower than that of lgAPF, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-6.37, P<0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the results of multiple linear regression showed that humidity, forced vital capacity and respiratory rate were negatively correlated with lgWPF (β=-0.008, -0.079, -0.021, P<0.05) . Conclusion: The actual protective efficacy of RPE among workers exposed to TCE is suboptimal. High humidity, elevated forced vital capacity, and increased respiratory rate may be contributing factors to the diminished protective performance of RPE.

[三氯乙烯作业人员呼吸防护用品实际防护效果及影响因素分析]。
目的:了解三氯乙烯(TCE)作业人员呼吸防护装备(RPE)实际防护效果的现状,并探讨影响其实际防护效果的因素。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,于2023年7月至12月选取全省21家五金电子制造企业的75名职业暴露工人作为研究对象。以工作场所保护系数(WPF)为指标,评价工人RPE的实际保护效果。检测RPE内外的TCE浓度,计算WPE,测量工作场所附近的温度、湿度、风速,测量工人的用力肺活量、呼吸频率、心率等指标。对数变换后的WPF值服从正态分布。采用单样本t检验比较lgWPF均值与半掩膜指定保护因子(lgAPF=1)对数值的差值。采用多元线性回归模型对影响lgWPF的因素进行研究。结果:75名tce暴露工人的lgWPF范围为0.40 ~ 1.32(0.84±0.22)。lgWPF的平均值低于lgAPF,差异有统计学意义(t=-6.37, Pβ=-0.008, -0.079, -0.021, p)。结论:RPE对职业性职业性暴露工人的实际保护效果并不理想。高湿度、用力肺活量升高和呼吸频率增加可能是导致RPE防护性能下降的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信