Risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jia-Rui Liu, Jin Zhang, Xiang-Long Duan
{"title":"Risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Jia-Rui Liu, Jin Zhang, Xiang-Long Duan","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical management of rectal cancer is continuously advancing, with a current emphasis on minimising the need for a permanent stoma. Understanding the risk factors influencing sphincter preservation is crucial for guiding clinical decision-making and optimising preoperative patient evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the demographics, preoperative and intraoperative data, and pathological findings of 179 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery at our hospital between January 2022 and December 2023 was conducted. These clinical data were compared between two groups: Patients with sphincter preservation and those without, categorised as the sphincter-preserved and sphincter-unpreserved groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 179 patients analysed, 150 were in the sphincter-preserved group and 29 were in the sphincter-unpreserved group. Tumour height was significantly greater in the sphincter-preserved group compared to the sphincter-unpreserved group. Conversely, elevated levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and plasma D-dimer were significantly higher in the sphincter-unpreserved group. Significant differences were also observed between the two groups in terms of place of residence, presence of colonic polyps, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mucinous adenocarcinoma, nerve invasion, and tumour height. No significant differences were observed for other parameters. Logistic regression analysis identified colonic polyps, mucinous adenocarcinoma, nerve invasion, and tumour height as independent risk factors for sphincter preservation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery were identified. These factors could be valuable tools for guiding clinical decision-making and optimising preoperative patient evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"101061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The surgical management of rectal cancer is continuously advancing, with a current emphasis on minimising the need for a permanent stoma. Understanding the risk factors influencing sphincter preservation is crucial for guiding clinical decision-making and optimising preoperative patient evaluation.

Aim: To examine the risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the demographics, preoperative and intraoperative data, and pathological findings of 179 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery at our hospital between January 2022 and December 2023 was conducted. These clinical data were compared between two groups: Patients with sphincter preservation and those without, categorised as the sphincter-preserved and sphincter-unpreserved groups, respectively.

Results: Of the 179 patients analysed, 150 were in the sphincter-preserved group and 29 were in the sphincter-unpreserved group. Tumour height was significantly greater in the sphincter-preserved group compared to the sphincter-unpreserved group. Conversely, elevated levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and plasma D-dimer were significantly higher in the sphincter-unpreserved group. Significant differences were also observed between the two groups in terms of place of residence, presence of colonic polyps, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mucinous adenocarcinoma, nerve invasion, and tumour height. No significant differences were observed for other parameters. Logistic regression analysis identified colonic polyps, mucinous adenocarcinoma, nerve invasion, and tumour height as independent risk factors for sphincter preservation.

Conclusion: Several risk factors influencing sphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery were identified. These factors could be valuable tools for guiding clinical decision-making and optimising preoperative patient evaluations.

影响腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中括约肌保存的危险因素。
背景:直肠癌的外科治疗不断进步,目前的重点是尽量减少对永久造口的需要。了解影响括约肌保留的危险因素对指导临床决策和优化术前患者评估至关重要。目的:探讨影响腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留括约肌的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月在我院行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的179例直肠癌患者的人口学特征、术前、术中资料及病理表现。将这些临床数据在两组之间进行比较:保留括约肌的患者和没有保留括约肌的患者,分别分为保留括约肌组和未保留括约肌组。结果:179例患者中,保留括约肌组150例,未保留括约肌组29例。保留括约肌组的肿瘤高度明显高于未保留括约肌组。相反,未保存括约肌组癌胚抗原、碳水化合物抗原19-9和血浆d -二聚体水平明显升高。两组患者在居住地、有无结肠息肉、新辅助化疗、术前放疗、粘液腺癌、神经侵犯、肿瘤高度等方面也存在显著差异。其他参数无显著差异。Logistic回归分析发现结肠息肉、粘液腺癌、神经侵犯和肿瘤高度是保留括约肌的独立危险因素。结论:确定了影响腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中括约肌保存的几个危险因素。这些因素可能是指导临床决策和优化术前患者评估的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信