Follow-up of elderly gastric cancer post-radical surgery: Trauma, complications, and prognosis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li-Ling Zhu, Rui-Zhi Shen
{"title":"Follow-up of elderly gastric cancer post-radical surgery: Trauma, complications, and prognosis.","authors":"Li-Ling Zhu, Rui-Zhi Shen","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of gastric cancer in the elderly is increasing; however, standardized surgical approaches are lacking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of radical surgery on the trauma response, postoperative complications, and long-term prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and December 2023, 110 gastric cancer patients admitted to the Department of Oncology Jiangnan University Medical Center were categorized into a control group (40 cases) and an observation group (70 cases) based on surgical method differences. The control and observation group received palliative surgery and radical surgery, respectively, and were further divided into open (25 cases) and laparoscopic (45 cases) surgery. Surgical outcomes, trauma indicators, complication rates, and long-term survival at 6 months, 1-, and 2-years were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery showed superior surgical outcomes compared to the open surgery and control groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Trauma indicators were lowest in the laparoscopic group and highest in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the complication rates between the open and laparoscopic groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05), but both were higher than those in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were found in survival rates at different follow-up periods between the laparoscopic and open groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05); however, both groups showed higher survival rates than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radical surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer reduces surgical trauma response, facilitates postoperative recovery, and improves long-term survival rates, albeit with an increased risk of complications. Laparoscopic radical surgery further minimizes postoperative trauma, with no significant difference in complication rates and survival prognosis compared with open radical surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"100143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of gastric cancer in the elderly is increasing; however, standardized surgical approaches are lacking.

Aim: To investigate the effects of radical surgery on the trauma response, postoperative complications, and long-term prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2023, 110 gastric cancer patients admitted to the Department of Oncology Jiangnan University Medical Center were categorized into a control group (40 cases) and an observation group (70 cases) based on surgical method differences. The control and observation group received palliative surgery and radical surgery, respectively, and were further divided into open (25 cases) and laparoscopic (45 cases) surgery. Surgical outcomes, trauma indicators, complication rates, and long-term survival at 6 months, 1-, and 2-years were compared.

Results: Laparoscopic surgery showed superior surgical outcomes compared to the open surgery and control groups (P < 0.05). Trauma indicators were lowest in the laparoscopic group and highest in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the complication rates between the open and laparoscopic groups (P > 0.05), but both were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in survival rates at different follow-up periods between the laparoscopic and open groups (P > 0.05); however, both groups showed higher survival rates than the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Radical surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer reduces surgical trauma response, facilitates postoperative recovery, and improves long-term survival rates, albeit with an increased risk of complications. Laparoscopic radical surgery further minimizes postoperative trauma, with no significant difference in complication rates and survival prognosis compared with open radical surgery.

老年胃癌根治术后随访:创伤、并发症及预后。
背景:老年人胃癌发病率呈上升趋势;然而,缺乏标准化的手术方法。目的:探讨根治性手术对老年胃癌患者创伤反应、术后并发症及远期预后的影响。方法:选取2020年1月~ 2023年12月江南大学医学中心肿瘤科收治的110例胃癌患者,根据手术方式差异分为对照组(40例)和观察组(70例)。对照组和观察组分别行姑息性手术和根治性手术,并进一步分为开腹手术(25例)和腹腔镜手术(45例)。比较手术结果、创伤指标、并发症发生率和6个月、1年和2年的长期生存率。结果:腹腔镜手术优于开放手术组和对照组(P < 0.05)。创伤指标腹腔镜组最低,对照组最高(P < 0.05)。开放组与腹腔镜组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),但均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。腹腔镜组与开放组各随访期生存率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组患者的生存率均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:根治性手术治疗老年胃癌患者可减少手术创伤反应,促进术后恢复,提高远期生存率,但并发症风险增加。腹腔镜根治术进一步减少了术后创伤,与开放式根治术相比,并发症发生率和生存预后无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信