{"title":"Effect of forearm and posterior wall anastomosis on gastroesophageal reflux in proximal gastrectomy patients.","authors":"Jia-Le Yang, Yi-Jie Yang, Lu Xu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer often leads to postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). This study compares the impact of forearm anastomosis and posterior wall anastomosis techniques on GER in patients undergoing this procedure.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the most effective method for reducing reflux symptoms while preserving gastrointestinal integrity and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 60 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy between December 2020 and December 2023, divided equally into two groups based on the anastomosis technique used (forearm or posterior wall). GER symptoms were assessed using the GER disease questionnaire (GerdQ) preoperatively and on the first postoperative day. Biochemical markers [diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactic acid, and endotoxin (ETX)] and nutritional indicators [serum ferritin (SF), prealbumin (PA), and albumin (ALB)] were measured to evaluate gastrointestinal barrier function and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in GerdQ scores and reflux symptom scores post-treatment, with the observation group exhibiting greater reductions. Biochemical markers indicated enhanced gastrointestinal barrier function post-treatment in both groups, with notable increases in DAO, D-lactic, and ETX levels. Nutritional status indicators also demonstrated significant changes, with reductions in SF, PA, and ALB levels, suggesting an impact of treatment on inflammatory and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The forearm anastomosis technique appears to be more effective in reducing GER symptoms and preserving gastrointestinal health in patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared to the posterior wall anastomosis technique. These preliminary findings advocate for further research to confirm the benefits and potentially standardize Forearm Anastomosis in surgical practice for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"100799"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer often leads to postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). This study compares the impact of forearm anastomosis and posterior wall anastomosis techniques on GER in patients undergoing this procedure.
Aim: To identify the most effective method for reducing reflux symptoms while preserving gastrointestinal integrity and nutritional status.
Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 60 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy between December 2020 and December 2023, divided equally into two groups based on the anastomosis technique used (forearm or posterior wall). GER symptoms were assessed using the GER disease questionnaire (GerdQ) preoperatively and on the first postoperative day. Biochemical markers [diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactic acid, and endotoxin (ETX)] and nutritional indicators [serum ferritin (SF), prealbumin (PA), and albumin (ALB)] were measured to evaluate gastrointestinal barrier function and nutritional status.
Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in GerdQ scores and reflux symptom scores post-treatment, with the observation group exhibiting greater reductions. Biochemical markers indicated enhanced gastrointestinal barrier function post-treatment in both groups, with notable increases in DAO, D-lactic, and ETX levels. Nutritional status indicators also demonstrated significant changes, with reductions in SF, PA, and ALB levels, suggesting an impact of treatment on inflammatory and nutritional status.
Conclusion: The forearm anastomosis technique appears to be more effective in reducing GER symptoms and preserving gastrointestinal health in patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared to the posterior wall anastomosis technique. These preliminary findings advocate for further research to confirm the benefits and potentially standardize Forearm Anastomosis in surgical practice for gastric cancer.