Effect of forearm and posterior wall anastomosis on gastroesophageal reflux in proximal gastrectomy patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jia-Le Yang, Yi-Jie Yang, Lu Xu
{"title":"Effect of forearm and posterior wall anastomosis on gastroesophageal reflux in proximal gastrectomy patients.","authors":"Jia-Le Yang, Yi-Jie Yang, Lu Xu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer often leads to postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). This study compares the impact of forearm anastomosis and posterior wall anastomosis techniques on GER in patients undergoing this procedure.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the most effective method for reducing reflux symptoms while preserving gastrointestinal integrity and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 60 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy between December 2020 and December 2023, divided equally into two groups based on the anastomosis technique used (forearm or posterior wall). GER symptoms were assessed using the GER disease questionnaire (GerdQ) preoperatively and on the first postoperative day. Biochemical markers [diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactic acid, and endotoxin (ETX)] and nutritional indicators [serum ferritin (SF), prealbumin (PA), and albumin (ALB)] were measured to evaluate gastrointestinal barrier function and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in GerdQ scores and reflux symptom scores post-treatment, with the observation group exhibiting greater reductions. Biochemical markers indicated enhanced gastrointestinal barrier function post-treatment in both groups, with notable increases in DAO, D-lactic, and ETX levels. Nutritional status indicators also demonstrated significant changes, with reductions in SF, PA, and ALB levels, suggesting an impact of treatment on inflammatory and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The forearm anastomosis technique appears to be more effective in reducing GER symptoms and preserving gastrointestinal health in patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared to the posterior wall anastomosis technique. These preliminary findings advocate for further research to confirm the benefits and potentially standardize Forearm Anastomosis in surgical practice for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"100799"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer often leads to postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). This study compares the impact of forearm anastomosis and posterior wall anastomosis techniques on GER in patients undergoing this procedure.

Aim: To identify the most effective method for reducing reflux symptoms while preserving gastrointestinal integrity and nutritional status.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 60 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy between December 2020 and December 2023, divided equally into two groups based on the anastomosis technique used (forearm or posterior wall). GER symptoms were assessed using the GER disease questionnaire (GerdQ) preoperatively and on the first postoperative day. Biochemical markers [diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactic acid, and endotoxin (ETX)] and nutritional indicators [serum ferritin (SF), prealbumin (PA), and albumin (ALB)] were measured to evaluate gastrointestinal barrier function and nutritional status.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in GerdQ scores and reflux symptom scores post-treatment, with the observation group exhibiting greater reductions. Biochemical markers indicated enhanced gastrointestinal barrier function post-treatment in both groups, with notable increases in DAO, D-lactic, and ETX levels. Nutritional status indicators also demonstrated significant changes, with reductions in SF, PA, and ALB levels, suggesting an impact of treatment on inflammatory and nutritional status.

Conclusion: The forearm anastomosis technique appears to be more effective in reducing GER symptoms and preserving gastrointestinal health in patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared to the posterior wall anastomosis technique. These preliminary findings advocate for further research to confirm the benefits and potentially standardize Forearm Anastomosis in surgical practice for gastric cancer.

前臂与后壁吻合对近端胃切除术患者胃食管反流的影响。
背景:胃癌近端胃切除术常导致术后胃食管反流(GER)。本研究比较前臂吻合术和后壁吻合术对GER患者的影响。目的:探讨在保持胃肠道完整和营养状况的同时减少反流症状的最有效方法。方法:回顾性分析2020年12月至2023年12月间行胃近端切除术的60例患者,根据吻合方式(前臂或后壁)分为两组。术前和术后第一天采用GER疾病问卷(GerdQ)评估GER症状。测定生化指标[二胺氧化酶(DAO)、d -乳酸和内毒素(ETX)]和营养指标[血清铁蛋白(SF)、前白蛋白(PA)和白蛋白(ALB)],评估胃肠道屏障功能和营养状况。结果:两组治疗后GerdQ评分和反流症状评分均有显著改善,观察组降低幅度更大。生化指标显示两组治疗后胃肠道屏障功能增强,DAO、d -乳酸和ETX水平均显著升高。营养状况指标也显示出显著变化,SF、PA和ALB水平降低,表明治疗对炎症和营养状况有影响。结论:与后壁吻合技术相比,前臂吻合技术在减轻胃癌近端胃切除术患者GER症状和保持胃肠道健康方面更有效。这些初步发现支持进一步的研究,以确认前臂吻合在胃癌手术实践中的益处和潜在的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信