Retrospective analysis of delta hemoglobin and bleeding-related risk factors in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yi-Min Lin, Chao Yu, Guo-Zhe Xian
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of delta hemoglobin and bleeding-related risk factors in pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Yi-Min Lin, Chao Yu, Guo-Zhe Xian","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective and accurate assessment of blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of the procedure. While the visual method remains the most common clinical metric, many scholars argue that it significantly differs from actual blood loss and is inherently subjective.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess blood loss in PD <i>via</i> delta hemoglobin (ΔHb) and compare it with the visual method to predict bleeding-related risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, 1722 patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2022 at Shandong Provincial Hospital were divided into three groups: Open PD (OPD), laparoscopic PD (LPD), and conversion to OPD (CTOPD). Intraoperative ΔHb (IΔHb) was calculated <i>via</i> preoperative and 72-hour-postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, and its association with visually obtained estimated blood loss (EBL) was analyzed. Perioperative ΔHb (PΔHb) was calculated <i>via</i> preoperative and predischarge hemoglobin concentrations. We compared the differences in IΔHb and PΔHb among the three groups, and performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses of IΔHb and PΔHb.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative general information of patients showed no statistically significant difference among the three groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The IΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 22.00 (12.00, 36.00), 21.00 (10.00, 33.00), and 33.00 (18.12, 52.24) g/L, respectively; And the PΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 25.87 (13.51, 42.00), 25.00 (14.00, 45.00), and 37.48 (21.64, 59.65) g/L, respectively, values significantly differed (<i>P</i> < 0.05). IΔHb and EBL were significantly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.337, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The results of univariate and multivariate regression analyses indicated that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification IV [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.330-37.811, <i>P</i> = 0.049] and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 2.805-8.673, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were independent risk factors for IΔHb (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and ASA classification IV (95%CI: 45.934-105.485, <i>P</i> < 0.001), body mass index > 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95%CI: 1.285-9.890, <i>P</i> = 0.011), and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 6.948-16.797, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PΔHb (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a correlation between IΔHb and EBL in PD, so we can assess the patients' intraoperative blood loss by the ΔHb method. ASA classification IV, body mass index > 24 kg/m², and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L increased perioperative bleeding risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"100999"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Objective and accurate assessment of blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of the procedure. While the visual method remains the most common clinical metric, many scholars argue that it significantly differs from actual blood loss and is inherently subjective.

Aim: To assess blood loss in PD via delta hemoglobin (ΔHb) and compare it with the visual method to predict bleeding-related risk factors.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 1722 patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2022 at Shandong Provincial Hospital were divided into three groups: Open PD (OPD), laparoscopic PD (LPD), and conversion to OPD (CTOPD). Intraoperative ΔHb (IΔHb) was calculated via preoperative and 72-hour-postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, and its association with visually obtained estimated blood loss (EBL) was analyzed. Perioperative ΔHb (PΔHb) was calculated via preoperative and predischarge hemoglobin concentrations. We compared the differences in IΔHb and PΔHb among the three groups, and performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses of IΔHb and PΔHb.

Results: The preoperative general information of patients showed no statistically significant difference among the three groups (P > 0.05). The IΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 22.00 (12.00, 36.00), 21.00 (10.00, 33.00), and 33.00 (18.12, 52.24) g/L, respectively; And the PΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 25.87 (13.51, 42.00), 25.00 (14.00, 45.00), and 37.48 (21.64, 59.65) g/L, respectively, values significantly differed (P < 0.05). IΔHb and EBL were significantly correlated (r = 0.337, P < 0.001). The results of univariate and multivariate regression analyses indicated that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification IV [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.330-37.811, P = 0.049] and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 2.805-8.673, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for IΔHb (P < 0.05), and ASA classification IV (95%CI: 45.934-105.485, P < 0.001), body mass index > 24 kg/m2 (95%CI: 1.285-9.890, P = 0.011), and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 6.948-16.797, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PΔHb (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: There is a correlation between IΔHb and EBL in PD, so we can assess the patients' intraoperative blood loss by the ΔHb method. ASA classification IV, body mass index > 24 kg/m², and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L increased perioperative bleeding risk.

胰十二指肠切除术中δ血红蛋白及出血相关危险因素的回顾性分析。
背景:客观准确地评估胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中出血量对于确保手术的安全性和有效性至关重要。虽然视觉方法仍然是最常见的临床指标,但许多学者认为它与实际失血有很大不同,并且本质上是主观的。目的:通过血红蛋白(ΔHb)评估PD患者的失血量,并与目测法预测出血相关危险因素进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2022年在山东省立医院接受PD治疗的1722例患者,将其分为开放式PD (OPD)组、腹腔镜PD (LPD)组和转OPD (CTOPD)组。术中通过术前和术后72小时血红蛋白浓度计算ΔHb (IΔHb),并分析其与目测失血量(EBL)的相关性。通过术前和出院前血红蛋白浓度计算围手术期ΔHb (PΔHb)。我们比较了三组患者IΔHb和PΔHb的差异,并对IΔHb和PΔHb进行了单因素和多因素回归分析。结果:三组患者术前一般情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。OPD、LPD、CTOPD组的IΔHb分别为22.00(12.00,36.00)、21.00(10.00,33.00)、33.00 (18.12,52.24)g/L;OPD组、LPD组、CTOPD组的PΔHb分别为25.87(13.51,42.00)、25.00(14.00,45.00)、37.48 (21.64,59.65)g/L,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。IΔHb与EBL呈显著相关(r = 0.337, P < 0.001)。单因素和多因素回归分析结果显示,美国麻醉师学会(ASA) IV类分类[95%置信区间(CI): 2.330 ~ 37.811, P = 0.049]和术前总胆红素> 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 2.805 ~ 8.673, P < 0.001)是IΔHb (P < 0.05)的独立危险因素,ASA IV类分类(95%CI: 45.934 ~ 105.485, P < 0.001)、体重指数> 24 kg/m2 (95%CI:1.285 ~ 9.890, P = 0.011)、术前总胆红素> 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 6.948 ~ 16.797, P < 0.001)是PΔHb的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结论:PD患者的EBL与IΔHb有相关性,可以通过ΔHb的方法来评估患者术中出血量。ASA分级IV级,体重指数> 24 kg/m²,术前总胆红素> 200 μmol/L增加围手术期出血风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信