L Cools, O Jennen, S Lambrichts, K Vansteelandt, P Sienaert
{"title":"[Relapse in psychotic depression and comparison with non-psychotic depression].","authors":"L Cools, O Jennen, S Lambrichts, K Vansteelandt, P Sienaert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe disease with a lifetime prevalence between 0.35 and 1%. The guidelines recommend combination therapy with an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, whereas in non-psychotic depression (NPD) an antidepressant is advised as monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether there is a difference in relapse rates between PD and NPD, and which treatment is associated with the lowest relapse rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search across 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL) and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare relapse rates between PD and NPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies with a total of 468 patients and 147 relapse events were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated in relapse rates between PD and NPD. The difference in relapse rates in PD between various treatments was not statistically analyzed, but qualitatively described. There was a wide variation in treatment methods and a broad range of relapse rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our findings, there is no statistically significant difference in relapse rates between patients with PD and NPD. However, caution is warranted with this conclusion, as the meta-analysis is based on a limited number of studies with high variability in the outcome measure. It seems important to continue acute treatment after response or remission, but which treatment modality best prevents relapse remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 3","pages":"175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe disease with a lifetime prevalence between 0.35 and 1%. The guidelines recommend combination therapy with an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, whereas in non-psychotic depression (NPD) an antidepressant is advised as monotherapy.
Aim: To determine whether there is a difference in relapse rates between PD and NPD, and which treatment is associated with the lowest relapse rate.
Methods: A systematic literature search across 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL) and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare relapse rates between PD and NPD.
Results: Eight studies with a total of 468 patients and 147 relapse events were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated in relapse rates between PD and NPD. The difference in relapse rates in PD between various treatments was not statistically analyzed, but qualitatively described. There was a wide variation in treatment methods and a broad range of relapse rates.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, there is no statistically significant difference in relapse rates between patients with PD and NPD. However, caution is warranted with this conclusion, as the meta-analysis is based on a limited number of studies with high variability in the outcome measure. It seems important to continue acute treatment after response or remission, but which treatment modality best prevents relapse remains unclear.
背景:精神病性抑郁症(PD)是一种严重的疾病,其终生患病率在0.35 - 1%之间。指南建议抗抑郁药和抗精神病药联合治疗,而在非精神病性抑郁症(NPD)中,抗抑郁药建议作为单一治疗。目的:确定PD和NPD的复发率是否存在差异,以及哪种治疗方法的复发率最低。方法:对6个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane和CINAHL)进行系统文献检索,并进行meta分析,比较PD和NPD的复发率。结果:meta分析纳入了8项研究,共468例患者和147例复发事件。PD和NPD的复发率无统计学差异。不同治疗方法之间PD复发率的差异没有统计学分析,但定性描述。治疗方法和复发率的差异很大。结论:根据我们的研究结果,PD和NPD患者的复发率没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,谨慎的结论是有必要的,因为荟萃分析是基于有限数量的研究,结果测量具有很高的可变性。在反应或缓解后继续急性治疗似乎很重要,但哪种治疗方式最能预防复发尚不清楚。