{"title":"[External referrals within the Wvggz at a mental health institution in the Rijnmond region].","authors":"Y Fransen, M A V van Verschuer, N J M van Beveren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2020, the Compulsory Mental Healthcare Act (Wvggz) has been in effect in the Netherlands. This law provides the option for ‘compulsory care’ for individuals experiencing severe harm as a result of a mental disorder. A new element introduced by this law is the ‘external referral’ (externe aanwijzing). This allows anyone to raise concerns about a citizen’s mental condition and report it. This can lead to an external referral of a medical director (GD), initiated by the public prosecutor. The GD is responsible for determining whether care is needed in the context of a care authorization or ‘zorgmachtiging’ (ZM).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse the process of the ‘externe aanwijzing’ within Antes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study is conducted at Antes, an institution for mental healthcare, where 128 externe aanwijzingen were analyzed during the period of 2020-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (60%) of the analyzed externe aanwijzingen resulted in a positive recommendation for a ZM by the GD. Externe aanwijzingen through a forensic route more frequently led to a ZM (68%) compared to those through the municipality (39%). Nearly all patients with a ZM received active treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with a forensic externe aanwijzing more commonly receive a ZM directly as a result of this process. The externe aanwijzing proves to be a valuable means of engaging individuals averse to care, including voluntarily. This study provides insights into the process of externe aanwijzingen and care authorizations within Antes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 3","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Since 2020, the Compulsory Mental Healthcare Act (Wvggz) has been in effect in the Netherlands. This law provides the option for ‘compulsory care’ for individuals experiencing severe harm as a result of a mental disorder. A new element introduced by this law is the ‘external referral’ (externe aanwijzing). This allows anyone to raise concerns about a citizen’s mental condition and report it. This can lead to an external referral of a medical director (GD), initiated by the public prosecutor. The GD is responsible for determining whether care is needed in the context of a care authorization or ‘zorgmachtiging’ (ZM).
Aim: To analyse the process of the ‘externe aanwijzing’ within Antes.
Methods: This observational study is conducted at Antes, an institution for mental healthcare, where 128 externe aanwijzingen were analyzed during the period of 2020-2021.
Results: The majority (60%) of the analyzed externe aanwijzingen resulted in a positive recommendation for a ZM by the GD. Externe aanwijzingen through a forensic route more frequently led to a ZM (68%) compared to those through the municipality (39%). Nearly all patients with a ZM received active treatment.
Conclusion: Individuals with a forensic externe aanwijzing more commonly receive a ZM directly as a result of this process. The externe aanwijzing proves to be a valuable means of engaging individuals averse to care, including voluntarily. This study provides insights into the process of externe aanwijzingen and care authorizations within Antes.