Early outcomes of the Third-generation of ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein reflux.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Domenico Baccellieri, Vincenzo Ardita, Nicola Galati, Claudia Anselmi, Benedetta Mangili, Roberto Chiesa
{"title":"Early outcomes of the Third-generation of ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein reflux.","authors":"Domenico Baccellieri, Vincenzo Ardita, Nicola Galati, Claudia Anselmi, Benedetta Mangili, Roberto Chiesa","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> This study aimed to assess the safety of the third-generation ClosureFast catheter for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux in patients presenting to a dedicated vein center. <i>Materials and methods:</i> All consecutive patients with incompetent GSV who underwent RFA between December 2023 and May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study endpoints were technical success and postoperative complication rate at 30 days. Secondary study endpoints were freedom from GSV recanalization and recurrent varicose vein (RVV) rate over the follow-up. The improvement in symptoms (measured by the Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]) was evaluated. <i>Results:</i> During the study period, 50 limbs were treated in 50 consecutive patients (mean age 55.8±13.4 years; 56% women; CEAP 2-4; VCSS >5). The technical success rate was achieved in 100% of cases. There was no significant incidence of 30-day complications. There were no instances of deep venous thrombosis or puncture site thermal injury. One patient (2%) had hyperpigmentation; two patients (4%) had ecchymosis; 4 patients (8%) had pain. At a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.4 months, GSV occlusion and freedom from reintervention rates were both 100% within 1 week and 30 days respectively. No patients had RVV over the follow-up. The VCSS score had decreased a median of 3.5 (IQR: 2.4-5) points from baseline (p<0.01). The mean CEAP class had decreased to 1.59 points from baseline, reflecting a shift towards milder disease categories (C0-C2). <i>Conclusions:</i> The third generation of RFA is safe and effective to ablate the GSV with a low complication rate in the perioperative period. However, durability over the follow-up and further studies with larger cohorts of patients are still needed to confirm these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the safety of the third-generation ClosureFast catheter for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux in patients presenting to a dedicated vein center. Materials and methods: All consecutive patients with incompetent GSV who underwent RFA between December 2023 and May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study endpoints were technical success and postoperative complication rate at 30 days. Secondary study endpoints were freedom from GSV recanalization and recurrent varicose vein (RVV) rate over the follow-up. The improvement in symptoms (measured by the Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]) was evaluated. Results: During the study period, 50 limbs were treated in 50 consecutive patients (mean age 55.8±13.4 years; 56% women; CEAP 2-4; VCSS >5). The technical success rate was achieved in 100% of cases. There was no significant incidence of 30-day complications. There were no instances of deep venous thrombosis or puncture site thermal injury. One patient (2%) had hyperpigmentation; two patients (4%) had ecchymosis; 4 patients (8%) had pain. At a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.4 months, GSV occlusion and freedom from reintervention rates were both 100% within 1 week and 30 days respectively. No patients had RVV over the follow-up. The VCSS score had decreased a median of 3.5 (IQR: 2.4-5) points from baseline (p<0.01). The mean CEAP class had decreased to 1.59 points from baseline, reflecting a shift towards milder disease categories (C0-C2). Conclusions: The third generation of RFA is safe and effective to ablate the GSV with a low complication rate in the perioperative period. However, durability over the follow-up and further studies with larger cohorts of patients are still needed to confirm these outcomes.

第三代ClosureFast射频消融治疗大隐静脉返流的早期结果
背景:本研究旨在评估第三代ClosureFast导管用于射频消融(RFA)治疗前往专门静脉中心的大隐静脉(GSV)反流的安全性。材料和方法:回顾性分析2023年12月至2024年5月期间所有连续行RFA的不功能GSV患者。主要研究终点是30天的技术成功率和术后并发症发生率。次要研究终点是随访期间无GSV再通和静脉曲张复发(RVV)率。通过静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)评估症状的改善情况。结果:在研究期间,50例患者(平均年龄55.8±13.4岁;56%的女性;CEAP 2 - 4;vcs > 5)。技术成功率100%。30天并发症发生率无统计学意义。无深静脉血栓形成或穿刺部位热损伤。1例患者(2%)有色素沉着;2例(4%)有瘀斑;4例(8%)患者出现疼痛。平均随访2.9±1.4个月,1周和30天内GSV闭塞率和无再干预率均为100%。随访期间没有患者出现RVV。VCSS评分中位数较基线下降3.5分(IQR: 2.4-5)。结论:第三代RFA在围手术期安全有效,并发症发生率低。然而,仍需要随访的持久性和更大患者群体的进一步研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信