Payam S Shabestari, Stefan Schoisswohl, Zino Wellauer, Adrian Naas, Tobias Kleinjung, Martin Schecklmann, Berthold Langguth, Patrick Neff
{"title":"Prediction of acoustic tinnitus suppression using resting-state EEG via explainable AI approach.","authors":"Payam S Shabestari, Stefan Schoisswohl, Zino Wellauer, Adrian Naas, Tobias Kleinjung, Martin Schecklmann, Berthold Langguth, Patrick Neff","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95351-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tinnitus is defined as the perception of sound without an external source. Its perceptual suppression or on/off states remain poorly understood. This study investigates neural traits linked to brief acoustic tinnitus suppression (BATS) using naive resting-state EEG (closed eyes) from 102 individuals. A set of EEG features (band power, entropy, aperiodic slope and offset of the EEG spectrum, and connectivity) and standard classifiers were applied achieving consistent high accuracy across data splits: 98% for sensor and 86% for source models. The Random Forest model outperformed other classifiers by excelling in robustness and reduction of overfitting. It identified several key EEG features, most prominently alpha and gamma frequency band power. Gamma power was stronger in the left auditory network, while alpha power dominated the right hemisphere. Aperiodic features were normalized in individuals with BATS. Additionally, hyperconnected auditory-limbic networks in BATS suggest sensory gating may aid suppression. These findings demonstrate robust classification of BATS status, revealing distinct neural traits between tinnitus subpopulations. Our work emphasizes the role of neural mechanisms in predicting and managing tinnitus suppression. Moreover, it advances the understanding of effective feature selection, model choice, and validation strategies for analyzing clinical neurophysiological data in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95351-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tinnitus is defined as the perception of sound without an external source. Its perceptual suppression or on/off states remain poorly understood. This study investigates neural traits linked to brief acoustic tinnitus suppression (BATS) using naive resting-state EEG (closed eyes) from 102 individuals. A set of EEG features (band power, entropy, aperiodic slope and offset of the EEG spectrum, and connectivity) and standard classifiers were applied achieving consistent high accuracy across data splits: 98% for sensor and 86% for source models. The Random Forest model outperformed other classifiers by excelling in robustness and reduction of overfitting. It identified several key EEG features, most prominently alpha and gamma frequency band power. Gamma power was stronger in the left auditory network, while alpha power dominated the right hemisphere. Aperiodic features were normalized in individuals with BATS. Additionally, hyperconnected auditory-limbic networks in BATS suggest sensory gating may aid suppression. These findings demonstrate robust classification of BATS status, revealing distinct neural traits between tinnitus subpopulations. Our work emphasizes the role of neural mechanisms in predicting and managing tinnitus suppression. Moreover, it advances the understanding of effective feature selection, model choice, and validation strategies for analyzing clinical neurophysiological data in general.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.