Pierre Charleux, Juliette Chommeloux, Anthony Elhadad, Niki Procopi, Paul Guedeney, Clélia Martinez, Stéphanie Rouanet, Patrick Ecollan, Eric Vicaut, Alain Combes, Martin Dres, A Demoule, Mathieu Kerneis, Johanne Silvain, Gilles Montalescot, Michel Zeitouni
{"title":"Prehospital Antiplatelet Therapy In Patients With Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Suspected Of Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Pierre Charleux, Juliette Chommeloux, Anthony Elhadad, Niki Procopi, Paul Guedeney, Clélia Martinez, Stéphanie Rouanet, Patrick Ecollan, Eric Vicaut, Alain Combes, Martin Dres, A Demoule, Mathieu Kerneis, Johanne Silvain, Gilles Montalescot, Michel Zeitouni","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently no specific guidelines for prehospital antiplatelet therapy in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a prehospital antiplatelet loading dose in patients with OHCA suspected of ACS referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory (cath lab).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography within 24 hours after OHCA from 2012 to 2024. Prehospital antiplatelet treatment was defined as prescribing aspirin alone and/or a P2Y12 inhibitor before admission to the cath lab. Outcomes included: all-cause death at 30 days, in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke, and in-hospital major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3). An inverse probability weighting approach was used to compare outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 411 patients admitted to the cath lab within 24 hours after OHCA, 217 (52.8%) received prehospital antiplatelet therapy, either aspirin alone (44.5%) or aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (8.3%). There was no difference in 30-day all-cause death between patients who received a prehospital treatment and those who did not (56.7%[50.0%;63.1%] vs 59.8%[52.8%;66.4%], p=0.280). Rates of in-hospital MACE and major bleeding were not significantly different between the two strategies. Results appear to be consistent in subgroups of patients with ST-segment elevation or successfully resuscitated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital antiplatelet therapy was safe, but showed no apparent improvement in survival or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with OHCA suspected of ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110596"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There are currently no specific guidelines for prehospital antiplatelet therapy in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a prehospital antiplatelet loading dose in patients with OHCA suspected of ACS referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory (cath lab).
Methods: We included consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography within 24 hours after OHCA from 2012 to 2024. Prehospital antiplatelet treatment was defined as prescribing aspirin alone and/or a P2Y12 inhibitor before admission to the cath lab. Outcomes included: all-cause death at 30 days, in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke, and in-hospital major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3). An inverse probability weighting approach was used to compare outcomes between the two groups.
Results: Of the 411 patients admitted to the cath lab within 24 hours after OHCA, 217 (52.8%) received prehospital antiplatelet therapy, either aspirin alone (44.5%) or aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (8.3%). There was no difference in 30-day all-cause death between patients who received a prehospital treatment and those who did not (56.7%[50.0%;63.1%] vs 59.8%[52.8%;66.4%], p=0.280). Rates of in-hospital MACE and major bleeding were not significantly different between the two strategies. Results appear to be consistent in subgroups of patients with ST-segment elevation or successfully resuscitated patients.
Conclusions: Prehospital antiplatelet therapy was safe, but showed no apparent improvement in survival or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with OHCA suspected of ACS.
期刊介绍:
Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.