Laura A Voss, Rebekah J Nevel, Jennifer A Wambach, Lawrence M Nogee, Robin R Deterding, Alicia M Casey, Michael G O'Connor, Daniel I Craven, Jane B Taylor, Gail H Deutsch, Jade B Tam-Williams, Lea C Steffes, Steven K Brennan, Maria T Santiago, Sara C Sadreameli, Andrea F Heras, Michael R Powers, Antonia P Popova, Manvi Bansal, Aaron Hamvas, William A Gower, Fernando Urrego, Lisa R Young
{"title":"Genetic Testing Utilization in the U.S. Registry for Childhood Interstitial and Diffuse Lung Diseases.","authors":"Laura A Voss, Rebekah J Nevel, Jennifer A Wambach, Lawrence M Nogee, Robin R Deterding, Alicia M Casey, Michael G O'Connor, Daniel I Craven, Jane B Taylor, Gail H Deutsch, Jade B Tam-Williams, Lea C Steffes, Steven K Brennan, Maria T Santiago, Sara C Sadreameli, Andrea F Heras, Michael R Powers, Antonia P Popova, Manvi Bansal, Aaron Hamvas, William A Gower, Fernando Urrego, Lisa R Young","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases (chILD) comprise a diverse group of rare disorders. Identifying the underlying cause is crucial for treatment, prognosis, and estimating recurrence risk. The objective of this study was to assess the utilization of genetic testing for subjects enrolled in the United States National Registry for ChILD, a multicenter observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic data from participating sites were reviewed and analyzed in relationship to clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 609 children enrolled from 22 centers, genetic testing was performed for 55.5% (n = 338). Genetic testing results were positive (diagnostic) for 22.8% (n = 77), negative for 60.7% (n = 205), and uncertain for 16.6% (n = 56). Most testing was performed through gene panels (55.9%), followed by exome sequencing (ES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) (26.9%), single gene testing (24.6%), and/or chromosomal microarray (11.8%). For participants with positive (diagnostic) genetic testing results, the majority were diagnosed through gene panel (33.8%; n = 26) or single gene testing (32.5%; n = 25). The most common diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing was SFTPC-associated surfactant metabolism dysfunction. Of the 59 subjects with unclassified ILD, only 22% (n = 13) had undergone ES or WGS, 61% (n = 36) had received panel testing, and 27% (n = 16) did not have any genetic testing reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of genetic testing has been variable in infants and children enrolled in the ChILD Registry. Additional efforts are needed to develop genetic testing recommendations for children with suspected ILD. Furthermore, there is opportunity for broader utilization of ES/WGS and genetic discovery for children with lung disease of unclear etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 4","pages":"e71073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases (chILD) comprise a diverse group of rare disorders. Identifying the underlying cause is crucial for treatment, prognosis, and estimating recurrence risk. The objective of this study was to assess the utilization of genetic testing for subjects enrolled in the United States National Registry for ChILD, a multicenter observational study.
Methods: Genetic data from participating sites were reviewed and analyzed in relationship to clinical characteristics.
Results: Of 609 children enrolled from 22 centers, genetic testing was performed for 55.5% (n = 338). Genetic testing results were positive (diagnostic) for 22.8% (n = 77), negative for 60.7% (n = 205), and uncertain for 16.6% (n = 56). Most testing was performed through gene panels (55.9%), followed by exome sequencing (ES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) (26.9%), single gene testing (24.6%), and/or chromosomal microarray (11.8%). For participants with positive (diagnostic) genetic testing results, the majority were diagnosed through gene panel (33.8%; n = 26) or single gene testing (32.5%; n = 25). The most common diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing was SFTPC-associated surfactant metabolism dysfunction. Of the 59 subjects with unclassified ILD, only 22% (n = 13) had undergone ES or WGS, 61% (n = 36) had received panel testing, and 27% (n = 16) did not have any genetic testing reported.
Conclusion: The utilization of genetic testing has been variable in infants and children enrolled in the ChILD Registry. Additional efforts are needed to develop genetic testing recommendations for children with suspected ILD. Furthermore, there is opportunity for broader utilization of ES/WGS and genetic discovery for children with lung disease of unclear etiology.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.