Pediatric perioperative hypersensitivity in Denmark: A 20 year retrospective analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Cecilie N Madsen, Birgitte Bech Melchiors, Holger Mosbech, Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen, Lene H Garvey
{"title":"Pediatric perioperative hypersensitivity in Denmark: A 20 year retrospective analysis.","authors":"Cecilie N Madsen, Birgitte Bech Melchiors, Holger Mosbech, Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen, Lene H Garvey","doi":"10.1111/pai.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) is rare but potentially life-threatening, and data on POH in children are sparse. This single-center study aimed to describe clinical presentations and allergy investigations in children with suspected POH in Denmark, and to evaluate a risk stratification algorithm used for suspected POH (elevated tryptase, 2 or more organ systems involved and urticaria/angioedema).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from 70 children who had undergone allergy investigations at the specialized Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre were included. Children were divided into a test positive and test negative group based on results from allergy investigations, and the groups were compared. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the risk stratification algorithm for suspected POH and for different combinations of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24% of the children tested positive. The most confirmed allergen was chlorhexidine (n = 3), followed by NMBAs (n = 2) and antibiotics (n = 2). Skin symptoms were most common (94%), and cardiovascular symptoms (CVS) appeared as the first symptom in 50% of the test positive children. CVS were more common in the test positive group. The risk stratification algorithm had a high sensitivity (88%) but a higher sensitivity (94%) was seen in the combination \"elevated tryptase or CVS or urticaria/angioedema\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several different allergens were confirmed in this study, including hidden allergens like chlorhexidine. This emphasizes the need to identify all potential allergens and the need for investigation at a specialized allergy center. More data are needed to make recommendations on the optimal risk stratification algorithm in children with suspected POH.</p>","PeriodicalId":19929,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 4","pages":"e70079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) is rare but potentially life-threatening, and data on POH in children are sparse. This single-center study aimed to describe clinical presentations and allergy investigations in children with suspected POH in Denmark, and to evaluate a risk stratification algorithm used for suspected POH (elevated tryptase, 2 or more organ systems involved and urticaria/angioedema).

Methods: Retrospective data from 70 children who had undergone allergy investigations at the specialized Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre were included. Children were divided into a test positive and test negative group based on results from allergy investigations, and the groups were compared. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the risk stratification algorithm for suspected POH and for different combinations of symptoms.

Results: 24% of the children tested positive. The most confirmed allergen was chlorhexidine (n = 3), followed by NMBAs (n = 2) and antibiotics (n = 2). Skin symptoms were most common (94%), and cardiovascular symptoms (CVS) appeared as the first symptom in 50% of the test positive children. CVS were more common in the test positive group. The risk stratification algorithm had a high sensitivity (88%) but a higher sensitivity (94%) was seen in the combination "elevated tryptase or CVS or urticaria/angioedema".

Conclusion: Several different allergens were confirmed in this study, including hidden allergens like chlorhexidine. This emphasizes the need to identify all potential allergens and the need for investigation at a specialized allergy center. More data are needed to make recommendations on the optimal risk stratification algorithm in children with suspected POH.

背景:围手术期过敏症(POH)非常罕见,但可能危及生命,有关儿童 POH 的数据非常稀少。这项单中心研究旨在描述丹麦疑似 POH 儿童的临床表现和过敏检查情况,并评估用于疑似 POH 的风险分层算法(胰蛋白酶升高、累及 2 个或 2 个以上器官系统和荨麻疹/水肿):方法:纳入在丹麦麻醉过敏专业中心接受过敏检查的 70 名儿童的回顾性数据。根据过敏检查结果,将儿童分为试验阳性组和试验阴性组,并对两组进行比较。针对疑似 POH 的风险分层算法和不同的症状组合计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。最确诊的过敏原是洗必泰(3 例),其次是 NMBAs(2 例)和抗生素(2 例)。皮肤症状最常见(94%),心血管症状(CVS)是 50%检测呈阳性儿童的首发症状。心血管症状在检测呈阳性组中更为常见。风险分层算法的灵敏度很高(88%),但 "胰蛋白酶升高或 CVS 或荨麻疹/血管性水肿 "组合的灵敏度更高(94%):结论:本研究确认了几种不同的过敏原,包括洗必泰等隐性过敏原。这强调了识别所有潜在过敏原的必要性,以及在专业过敏中心进行调查的必要性。我们还需要更多的数据,才能就疑似 POH 儿童的最佳风险分层算法提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Allergy and Immunology is the world''s leading journal in pediatric allergy, publishing original contributions and comprehensive reviews related to the understanding and treatment of immune deficiency and allergic inflammatory and infectious diseases in children. Other areas of interest include: development of specific and accessory immunity; the immunological interaction during pregnancy and lactation between mother and child. As Pediatric Allergy and Immunology promotes communication between scientists engaged in basic research and clinicians working with children, we publish both clinical and experimental work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信