Evaluating Learning Curves in Virtual Reality Cortical Mastoidectomy Training Across Expertise Levels.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jesslyn Clarance Lamtara, Sudanthi Wijewickrema, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen O'Leary
{"title":"Evaluating Learning Curves in Virtual Reality Cortical Mastoidectomy Training Across Expertise Levels.","authors":"Jesslyn Clarance Lamtara, Sudanthi Wijewickrema, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen O'Leary","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) simulation has been established as an effective method of supplementing traditional surgical training. Learning curves can analyze skill acquisition over time in VR settings. Although previous studies explored learning curves of mastoidectomy performances on single specimen, this study analyzed learning curves on anatomically different virtual temporal bones across three expertise levels (novice, intermediate, and expert).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants were divided into three groups: 10 medical students (novice), 10 ear, nose and throat (ENT) registrars (intermediate), and 10 senior ear surgeons (expert). They performed mastoidectomy on eight anatomically different temporal bones on the University of Melbourne Temporal Bone Surgery Simulator. A blinded senior ENT surgeon assessed the final products of the dissections using the Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale (MMS). Learning curves of MMS scores, number of strokes, average force, drilling time, and total time were compared between groups using Friedman tests. Within-group analyses were conducted with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All performance metrics showed significant differences across all groups. Only comparison between intermediate and expert groups for average force was not significant. Within-group analyses showed significant differences in expert group for total and drilling time, intermediate group for average force, and novice group for total time. Individual learning curves of intermediate group demonstrated varied learning behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trainee performance was not seen to reach the level of experts after eight repetitions on anatomically different specimens. Enhancing training with individualized feedback and increased repetitions may optimize skills acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypothesis: Virtual reality (VR) simulation has been established as an effective method of supplementing traditional surgical training. Learning curves can analyze skill acquisition over time in VR settings. Although previous studies explored learning curves of mastoidectomy performances on single specimen, this study analyzed learning curves on anatomically different virtual temporal bones across three expertise levels (novice, intermediate, and expert).

Methods: Thirty participants were divided into three groups: 10 medical students (novice), 10 ear, nose and throat (ENT) registrars (intermediate), and 10 senior ear surgeons (expert). They performed mastoidectomy on eight anatomically different temporal bones on the University of Melbourne Temporal Bone Surgery Simulator. A blinded senior ENT surgeon assessed the final products of the dissections using the Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale (MMS). Learning curves of MMS scores, number of strokes, average force, drilling time, and total time were compared between groups using Friedman tests. Within-group analyses were conducted with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: All performance metrics showed significant differences across all groups. Only comparison between intermediate and expert groups for average force was not significant. Within-group analyses showed significant differences in expert group for total and drilling time, intermediate group for average force, and novice group for total time. Individual learning curves of intermediate group demonstrated varied learning behavior.

Conclusions: Trainee performance was not seen to reach the level of experts after eight repetitions on anatomically different specimens. Enhancing training with individualized feedback and increased repetitions may optimize skills acquisition.

假设:虚拟现实(VR)模拟已成为补充传统外科培训的有效方法。学习曲线可以分析在 VR 环境中随着时间推移掌握技能的情况。尽管之前的研究探讨了乳突切除术在单个标本上的学习曲线,但本研究分析了在三个专业水平(新手、中级和专家)的解剖学不同的虚拟颞骨上的学习曲线:30 名参与者分为三组:10 名医学生(新手)、10 名耳鼻喉科注册医师(中级)和 10 名资深耳外科医生(专家)。他们在墨尔本大学颞骨手术模拟器上对八块解剖结构不同的颞骨进行乳突切除术。由一名盲人高级耳鼻喉科外科医生使用墨尔本乳突切除术量表(MMS)对最终的切除结果进行评估。使用弗里德曼检验比较各组之间的 MMS 评分学习曲线、击打次数、平均用力、钻孔时间和总时间。组内分析采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:结果:所有性能指标在各组间均有显著差异。只有中级组和专家组之间的平均用力比较不显著。组内分析表明,专家组在总时间和钻孔时间上有显著差异,中级组在平均用力上有显著差异,新手组在总时间上有显著差异。中级组的个人学习曲线显示出不同的学习行为:结论:受训者在不同解剖标本上重复八次后,其表现仍未达到专家水平。通过个性化反馈和增加重复次数来加强训练可优化技能掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信