{"title":"Effects of Customized Web Video-Based Vestibular Rehabilitation for Patients With Vestibular Hypofunction: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Tomohiko Kamo, Hirofumi Ogihara, Ryozo Tanaka, Masato Azami, Takumi Kato, Reiko Tsunoda, Hiroaki Fushiki","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The dizziness specialty clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The participants were diagnosed with chronic vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The study used a randomized controlled trial design, in which participants were randomly assigned to either the customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation or booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients were assessed at three time points: before-intervention (baseline), post-intervention completion (6 wk), and follow-up (12 wk). The primary outcome was the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the secondary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and tertiary outcomes included other functional and psychological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant time effect for the DGI score (p < 0.0001). Comparing the post-intervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment, the customized web video-based VR group showed a significant increase in the DGI score. Time × group interaction effects were observed (F = 5.739, p < 0.01). Both groups showed decreased DHI_total scores when comparing the postintervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment. No serious adverse events were reported during intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that customized web video-based VR improved DGI compared with booklet-based VR, and the intervention effect was maintained at 6-week follow-up. Additionally, the findings suggested that both interventions improve to a similar extent DHI. Therefore, vestibular rehabilitation with motion visualized by video may be more effective than that with still image by booklet.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic vestibular hypofunction.
Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial.
Setting: The dizziness specialty clinic.
Patients: The participants were diagnosed with chronic vestibular hypofunction.
Interventions: The study used a randomized controlled trial design, in which participants were randomly assigned to either the customized web video-based vestibular rehabilitation or booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation in a 1:1 ratio.
Main outcome measures: Patients were assessed at three time points: before-intervention (baseline), post-intervention completion (6 wk), and follow-up (12 wk). The primary outcome was the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the secondary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and tertiary outcomes included other functional and psychological assessments.
Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant time effect for the DGI score (p < 0.0001). Comparing the post-intervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment, the customized web video-based VR group showed a significant increase in the DGI score. Time × group interaction effects were observed (F = 5.739, p < 0.01). Both groups showed decreased DHI_total scores when comparing the postintervention and follow-up assessments to the baseline assessment. No serious adverse events were reported during intervention period.
Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that customized web video-based VR improved DGI compared with booklet-based VR, and the intervention effect was maintained at 6-week follow-up. Additionally, the findings suggested that both interventions improve to a similar extent DHI. Therefore, vestibular rehabilitation with motion visualized by video may be more effective than that with still image by booklet.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.