Deafness Progressing to Cochlear Implant Eligibility Is Eight Times More Likely in the Hypoplastic Than the Degenerative Endotype of Menière's Disease.
Catrin Brühlmann, Jennifer L Spiegel, Agnes Mühle, Adrian Dalbert, Vincent Y W Lin, Trung N Le, Thore Schade-Mann, Jessica Knoppik, Dorothe Veraguth, Christof Röösli, Alexander Huber, Julia Dlugaiczyk, Steven D Rauch, Hubert Löwenheim, Joseph M Chen, Amy F Juliano, Andreas H Eckhard, David Bächinger
{"title":"Deafness Progressing to Cochlear Implant Eligibility Is Eight Times More Likely in the Hypoplastic Than the Degenerative Endotype of Menière's Disease.","authors":"Catrin Brühlmann, Jennifer L Spiegel, Agnes Mühle, Adrian Dalbert, Vincent Y W Lin, Trung N Le, Thore Schade-Mann, Jessica Knoppik, Dorothe Veraguth, Christof Röösli, Alexander Huber, Julia Dlugaiczyk, Steven D Rauch, Hubert Löwenheim, Joseph M Chen, Amy F Juliano, Andreas H Eckhard, David Bächinger","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether one of the two recently described MD endotypes-defined by either endolymphatic sac degeneration (MD-dg patients) or hypoplasia (MD-hp patients)-is associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing CI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five tertiary referral centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>CI cohort: 115 adult MD patients with a history of uni- or bilateral CI. Non-CI cohort: 72 MD patients with no CI history. All included patients matched current diagnostic criteria for definite MD.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Endotype distribution (MD-dg versus MD-hp) between the CI cohort and the non-CI cohort. The endotype was determined using high-resolution CT data based on the angular trajectory of the vestibular aqueduct, following established protocols. Secondary outcomes included disease laterality, age at MD diagnosis, duration of MD, and pre-CI hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CI cohort included significantly more MD-hp patients than the non-CI cohort (72% versus 24%, p < 0.0001). The odds ratio of CI for an MD-hp patient relative to an MD-dg patient was 8.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.3-16.1). Pre-CI audiometric data showed no significant differences in hearing thresholds between endotypes, neither in the implanted nor in the non-implanted ear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MD-hp endotype, frequently associated with bilateral disease and early-age disease onset, is strongly linked to a higher likelihood of CI. Endotyping of MD patients based on endolymphatic sac pathology can effectively stratify their risk of severe hearing loss, guiding personalized audiological follow-up and clinical decisions regarding potential CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether one of the two recently described MD endotypes-defined by either endolymphatic sac degeneration (MD-dg patients) or hypoplasia (MD-hp patients)-is associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing CI.
Study design: Retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study.
Setting: Five tertiary referral centers.
Patients: CI cohort: 115 adult MD patients with a history of uni- or bilateral CI. Non-CI cohort: 72 MD patients with no CI history. All included patients matched current diagnostic criteria for definite MD.
Intervention: Cochlear implantation.
Main outcome measures: Endotype distribution (MD-dg versus MD-hp) between the CI cohort and the non-CI cohort. The endotype was determined using high-resolution CT data based on the angular trajectory of the vestibular aqueduct, following established protocols. Secondary outcomes included disease laterality, age at MD diagnosis, duration of MD, and pre-CI hearing thresholds.
Results: The CI cohort included significantly more MD-hp patients than the non-CI cohort (72% versus 24%, p < 0.0001). The odds ratio of CI for an MD-hp patient relative to an MD-dg patient was 8.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.3-16.1). Pre-CI audiometric data showed no significant differences in hearing thresholds between endotypes, neither in the implanted nor in the non-implanted ear.
Conclusions: The MD-hp endotype, frequently associated with bilateral disease and early-age disease onset, is strongly linked to a higher likelihood of CI. Endotyping of MD patients based on endolymphatic sac pathology can effectively stratify their risk of severe hearing loss, guiding personalized audiological follow-up and clinical decisions regarding potential CI.
目的:研究最近描述的两种MD内型(由内淋巴囊变性(MD-dg患者)或发育不全(MD-hp患者)定义)中的一种是否与接受CI的可能性增加有关。研究设计:回顾性多中心横断面研究。环境:五个三级转诊中心。患者:CI队列:115例有单侧或双侧CI病史的成年MD患者。非CI队列:72例无CI病史的MD患者。所有纳入的患者均符合当前明确的医学诊断标准。干预措施:人工耳蜗植入。主要结局指标:CI队列和非CI队列的内型分布(MD-dg vs MD-hp)。根据前庭导水管的角度轨迹,采用高分辨率CT数据确定内型,并遵循既定方案。次要结局包括疾病侧边性、MD诊断时的年龄、MD持续时间和ci前的听力阈值。结果:CI队列纳入的MD-hp患者明显多于非CI队列(72%对24%,p < 0.0001)。MD-hp患者相对于MD-dg患者的CI优势比为8.4(95%可信区间为4.3-16.1)。ci前听力学数据显示,植入耳和非植入耳的内耳类型之间的听力阈值没有显著差异。结论:MD-hp内型常与双侧疾病和早期发病相关,与CI的高可能性密切相关。基于内淋巴囊病理对MD患者进行内分型可以有效地对重度听力损失的风险进行分层,指导个性化听力学随访和潜在CI的临床决策。
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.