Cole Jurecka, Eric Cavana, Yanjia Zhang, Elizabeth A Erdman, Pallavi Aytha Swathi, Joshua A Barocas, Laura F White
{"title":"Rethinking Vulnerability: Using Factor Analysis to Assess Census Tract-Level Vulnerability.","authors":"Cole Jurecka, Eric Cavana, Yanjia Zhang, Elizabeth A Erdman, Pallavi Aytha Swathi, Joshua A Barocas, Laura F White","doi":"10.1177/00333549251313986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is used to guide policy making and resource allocation for emergency responses. However, limited research has explored the extent to which each variable contributes to the overall calculation of the SVI. We used a factor analysis approach to determine whether specific drivers of vulnerability exist at the state and national levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the 2020 CDC/ATSDR SVI dataset to perform factor analysis separately for each state and nationally. We determined factor weights and scores and conducted a comparative analysis with CDC/ATSDR SVI. The final SVI for each census tract ranged from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the national level, our factor analysis approach identified 4 primary variables that affected vulnerability the most: the percentage of the population below 150% of the federal poverty level (weight, 0.262), with housing cost burden (ie, households that spend >30% of their income on housing-related costs; weight, 0.226), in a racial and ethnic minority group (weight, 0.232), and without a high school diploma (weight, 0.138). However, at the state level, some analyses assigned low weights to the primary national-level drivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the need to consider context-specific vulnerability measures when characterizing community social vulnerability. The factor analysis SVI provides nuanced insight into vulnerability drivers at the national and state levels, laying the groundwork for more precise disaster response planning, resource allocation, and community resilience initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251313986"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251313986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is used to guide policy making and resource allocation for emergency responses. However, limited research has explored the extent to which each variable contributes to the overall calculation of the SVI. We used a factor analysis approach to determine whether specific drivers of vulnerability exist at the state and national levels.
Methods: We used the 2020 CDC/ATSDR SVI dataset to perform factor analysis separately for each state and nationally. We determined factor weights and scores and conducted a comparative analysis with CDC/ATSDR SVI. The final SVI for each census tract ranged from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater vulnerability.
Results: At the national level, our factor analysis approach identified 4 primary variables that affected vulnerability the most: the percentage of the population below 150% of the federal poverty level (weight, 0.262), with housing cost burden (ie, households that spend >30% of their income on housing-related costs; weight, 0.226), in a racial and ethnic minority group (weight, 0.232), and without a high school diploma (weight, 0.138). However, at the state level, some analyses assigned low weights to the primary national-level drivers.
Conclusions: Our study highlights the need to consider context-specific vulnerability measures when characterizing community social vulnerability. The factor analysis SVI provides nuanced insight into vulnerability drivers at the national and state levels, laying the groundwork for more precise disaster response planning, resource allocation, and community resilience initiatives.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health.
The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.