Vision-Threatening Complications of Soft Tissue Fillers: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

IF 13.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jill Foster, Vinay K Aakalu, Suzanne K Freitag, Timothy J McCulley, Jeremiah P Tao, M Reza Vagefi, Michael T Yen, Stephen J Kim, Edward J Wladis
{"title":"Vision-Threatening Complications of Soft Tissue Fillers: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.","authors":"Jill Foster, Vinay K Aakalu, Suzanne K Freitag, Timothy J McCulley, Jeremiah P Tao, M Reza Vagefi, Michael T Yen, Stephen J Kim, Edward J Wladis","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review evidence on ocular complications of injectable soft tissue fillers, identify features associated with risk for vision loss, and assess the efficacy and safety of reported treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search of the PubMed database was last conducted in May 2024. Articles were limited to English-language original research describing ocular complications of soft tissue fillers. Of 387 articles identified, 62 were selected for full-text review. Nineteen articles met the criteria for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 19 articles were assigned a level III rating by the panel methodologist. This assessment identified 198 cases of vision loss caused by accidental intravascular injection of filler material, hyaluronic acid gel in 164 cases (83%), autologous fat in 29 cases (15%), collagen in 3 cases, poly-L lactic acid gel in 1 case, and calcium hydroxyapatite in 1 case. The 226 injection sites, sometimes multiple locations, when described, were nose in 90 cases (40%); forehead in 56 cases (25%); glabella in 26 cases (12%); temple in 21 cases (9%) frontal in 17 cases (7%); nasolabial fold in 9 cases (4%); face in 2 cases; periocular in 2 cases; and lip, eyebrow, cheek, and upper eyelid in 1 case each. The central and upper midface (nose, forehead, glabella, frontal) were the most common sites (189 cases, 84%). The most common therapeutic interventions included hyaluronidase injection (local, orbital, and intra-arterial), intra-arterial injection of thrombolytic agents and hyaluronidase, anterior chamber paracentesis, IV corticosteroid, IV mannitol, and hyperbaric oxygen. These interventions, although safe, were usually not effective in reversing vision loss. Vision after the occlusive event and final vision were described in 196 cases; it was unchanged in 137 patients (70%), improved in 56 patients (28%), and worsened in 3 patients (2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inadvertent intravascular injection of soft tissue fillers is associated with cases of vision loss, with upper and central midface a common site of injection. This suggests zones of higher risk for vision loss compared with other facial areas. Hyaluronic acid gel was the most common material, although vison loss was also associated with a variety of other filler materials. No evidence-based protocol has been established for managing vision loss, but intra-arterial thrombolysis has had some success in recanalizing occluded arteries.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.01.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To review evidence on ocular complications of injectable soft tissue fillers, identify features associated with risk for vision loss, and assess the efficacy and safety of reported treatments.

Methods: Literature search of the PubMed database was last conducted in May 2024. Articles were limited to English-language original research describing ocular complications of soft tissue fillers. Of 387 articles identified, 62 were selected for full-text review. Nineteen articles met the criteria for inclusion.

Results: All 19 articles were assigned a level III rating by the panel methodologist. This assessment identified 198 cases of vision loss caused by accidental intravascular injection of filler material, hyaluronic acid gel in 164 cases (83%), autologous fat in 29 cases (15%), collagen in 3 cases, poly-L lactic acid gel in 1 case, and calcium hydroxyapatite in 1 case. The 226 injection sites, sometimes multiple locations, when described, were nose in 90 cases (40%); forehead in 56 cases (25%); glabella in 26 cases (12%); temple in 21 cases (9%) frontal in 17 cases (7%); nasolabial fold in 9 cases (4%); face in 2 cases; periocular in 2 cases; and lip, eyebrow, cheek, and upper eyelid in 1 case each. The central and upper midface (nose, forehead, glabella, frontal) were the most common sites (189 cases, 84%). The most common therapeutic interventions included hyaluronidase injection (local, orbital, and intra-arterial), intra-arterial injection of thrombolytic agents and hyaluronidase, anterior chamber paracentesis, IV corticosteroid, IV mannitol, and hyperbaric oxygen. These interventions, although safe, were usually not effective in reversing vision loss. Vision after the occlusive event and final vision were described in 196 cases; it was unchanged in 137 patients (70%), improved in 56 patients (28%), and worsened in 3 patients (2%).

Conclusions: Inadvertent intravascular injection of soft tissue fillers is associated with cases of vision loss, with upper and central midface a common site of injection. This suggests zones of higher risk for vision loss compared with other facial areas. Hyaluronic acid gel was the most common material, although vison loss was also associated with a variety of other filler materials. No evidence-based protocol has been established for managing vision loss, but intra-arterial thrombolysis has had some success in recanalizing occluded arteries.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信