Talking About Barriers to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Content Analysis of Audio-Recorded Routine Clinical Visits of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S503083
Marieke J H Voshaar, Bart J F Van den Bemt, Mart A van de Laar, Sandra van Dulmen, Johanna E Vriezekolk
{"title":"Talking About Barriers to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Content Analysis of Audio-Recorded Routine Clinical Visits of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.","authors":"Marieke J H Voshaar, Bart J F Van den Bemt, Mart A van de Laar, Sandra van Dulmen, Johanna E Vriezekolk","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effective healthcare professional-patient communication is essential for medication adherence. Conversations about patient's barriers to medication use, for example, could help to enhance adherence and consequently improve treatment outcomes. However, it is unclear whether and how barriers to medication use are discussed during routine rheumatology consultations. The aims of this study were to examine 1) the barriers and facilitators to medication use raised by patients during real-life rheumatology outpatient consultations, and whether the issue of medication (non)adherence was discussed (communication content); and 2) how rheumatologists responded to the barriers (communication process).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 134 audio-recordings of real-life outpatient rheumatology consultations were analysed. Barriers and facilitators for the current use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were identified and categorized using a previously adapted Theoretical Domains Framework. The way rheumatologists responded to the barriers brought up by the patients was analysed using relevant parts of the Roter Interaction Analysis System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 58 of the 134 consultations, at least one barrier or facilitator to current medication use was brought up by the patient; in 31 out of 134 consultations, medication (non)adherence was addressed. Most facilitators were related to the quality of the needles, the use of an injection pen instead of a syringe, dose reduction because of low disease activity and timing of the medication. The majority of barriers were related to experiencing side effects and doubts about efficacy and resistance of (long-term use of) medication. Rheumatologists' responses to barriers related to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were mostly a combination of instrumental (counselling) and affective (agreement) communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers to current disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs' use raised by patients and discussed during routine rheumatology consultations were primarily related to side effects and concerns about the efficacy and long-term use. Continuous attention of these barriers and tailored responses to patients' concerns are key to promote better adherence to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"777-790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Effective healthcare professional-patient communication is essential for medication adherence. Conversations about patient's barriers to medication use, for example, could help to enhance adherence and consequently improve treatment outcomes. However, it is unclear whether and how barriers to medication use are discussed during routine rheumatology consultations. The aims of this study were to examine 1) the barriers and facilitators to medication use raised by patients during real-life rheumatology outpatient consultations, and whether the issue of medication (non)adherence was discussed (communication content); and 2) how rheumatologists responded to the barriers (communication process).

Methods: A total of 134 audio-recordings of real-life outpatient rheumatology consultations were analysed. Barriers and facilitators for the current use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were identified and categorized using a previously adapted Theoretical Domains Framework. The way rheumatologists responded to the barriers brought up by the patients was analysed using relevant parts of the Roter Interaction Analysis System.

Results: In 58 of the 134 consultations, at least one barrier or facilitator to current medication use was brought up by the patient; in 31 out of 134 consultations, medication (non)adherence was addressed. Most facilitators were related to the quality of the needles, the use of an injection pen instead of a syringe, dose reduction because of low disease activity and timing of the medication. The majority of barriers were related to experiencing side effects and doubts about efficacy and resistance of (long-term use of) medication. Rheumatologists' responses to barriers related to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were mostly a combination of instrumental (counselling) and affective (agreement) communication.

Conclusion: Barriers to current disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs' use raised by patients and discussed during routine rheumatology consultations were primarily related to side effects and concerns about the efficacy and long-term use. Continuous attention of these barriers and tailored responses to patients' concerns are key to promote better adherence to treatment.

谈抗风湿药物治疗障碍:类风湿关节炎患者常规临床就诊录音内容分析。
目的:有效的医疗专业人员与患者的沟通对药物依从性至关重要。例如,讨论患者使用药物的障碍可能有助于提高依从性,从而改善治疗效果。然而,尚不清楚在常规风湿病会诊中是否以及如何讨论药物使用障碍。本研究的目的是检查1)现实生活中风湿病门诊会诊时患者提出的药物使用障碍和促进因素,以及是否讨论了药物(不)依从性问题(沟通内容);2)风湿病学家如何应对障碍(沟通过程)。方法:对134份风湿病门诊实际问诊录音资料进行分析。目前使用改善疾病的抗风湿药物的障碍和促进因素被确定并使用先前改编的理论领域框架进行分类。风湿病学家对患者提出的障碍的反应方式使用Roter交互分析系统的相关部分进行了分析。结果:在134个咨询中,有58个患者提出了至少一个目前药物使用的障碍或促进因素;在134次咨询中,有31次解决了药物(不)依从性问题。大多数促进因素与针头的质量、使用注射笔而不是注射器、由于疾病活动性低而减少剂量和药物时间有关。大多数障碍与经历副作用以及对(长期使用)药物的疗效和耐药性的怀疑有关。风湿病学家对与疾病改善抗风湿药物相关的障碍的反应主要是工具性(咨询)和情感性(协议)沟通的结合。结论:患者提出并在常规风湿病会诊中讨论的当前改善疾病的抗风湿药物的使用障碍主要与副作用以及对疗效和长期使用的担忧有关。对这些障碍的持续关注和对患者关注的量身定制的反应是促进更好地坚持治疗的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信