Optimal timing of endoscopic biliary drainage for bile duct leaks: A multicenter, retrospective, clinical study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
De-Xin Chen, Kai-Xuan Fang, Sheng-Xin Chen, Sen-Lin Hou, Gui-Hai Wen, Hai-Kun Yang, Da-Peng Shi, Qing-Xin Lu, Ya-Qi Zhai, Ming-Yang Li
{"title":"Optimal timing of endoscopic biliary drainage for bile duct leaks: A multicenter, retrospective, clinical study.","authors":"De-Xin Chen, Kai-Xuan Fang, Sheng-Xin Chen, Sen-Lin Hou, Gui-Hai Wen, Hai-Kun Yang, Da-Peng Shi, Qing-Xin Lu, Ya-Qi Zhai, Ming-Yang Li","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile duct leaks (BDLs) are serious postsurgical adverse events. Typically, conservative management with abdominal drainage is the initial treatment option. However, prolonged abdominal drainage without improvement can lead to biliary stricture and delay the optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the optimal timing for ERCP and the period during which clinical observation with conservative management is acceptable, balancing ERCP success and the risk of biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 448 patients with BDLs between November 2002 and November 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the timing of ERCP: 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as the resolution of BDL and related symptoms within 6 months without additional percutaneous drainage, surgery, or death. The secondary outcome was incidence of biliary strictures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with ERCP success and biliary stricture occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 448 consecutive patients diagnosed with BDLs, 354 were excluded, leaving 94 patients who underwent ERCP. Clinical success was achieved in 84% of cases (79/94), with a median ERCP timing of 20 days (9.5-35.3 days). Biliary strictures were identified in 29 (30.9%) patients. Performing ERCP within 3 weeks, compared to after 3 weeks, was associated with higher success rates [92.0% (46/50) <i>vs</i> 75.0% (33/44), <i>P</i> = 0.032] and a lower incidence of biliary stricture incidence [18.0% (9/50) <i>vs</i> 45.5% (20/44), <i>P</i> = 0.005]. Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed the association with higher success rates (odds ratio = 4.168, <i>P</i> = 0.045) and lower biliary stricture rates (odds ratio = 0.256, <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Performing ERCP for BDLs within 3 weeks may be associated with a higher success rate and a lower biliary stricture rate. If patients with BDLs do not respond to conservative treatment, ERCP is suggested to be performed within 3 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"99425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile duct leaks (BDLs) are serious postsurgical adverse events. Typically, conservative management with abdominal drainage is the initial treatment option. However, prolonged abdominal drainage without improvement can lead to biliary stricture and delay the optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Aim: To identify the optimal timing for ERCP and the period during which clinical observation with conservative management is acceptable, balancing ERCP success and the risk of biliary strictures.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 448 patients with BDLs between November 2002 and November 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the timing of ERCP: 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as the resolution of BDL and related symptoms within 6 months without additional percutaneous drainage, surgery, or death. The secondary outcome was incidence of biliary strictures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with ERCP success and biliary stricture occurrence.

Results: In a cohort of 448 consecutive patients diagnosed with BDLs, 354 were excluded, leaving 94 patients who underwent ERCP. Clinical success was achieved in 84% of cases (79/94), with a median ERCP timing of 20 days (9.5-35.3 days). Biliary strictures were identified in 29 (30.9%) patients. Performing ERCP within 3 weeks, compared to after 3 weeks, was associated with higher success rates [92.0% (46/50) vs 75.0% (33/44), P = 0.032] and a lower incidence of biliary stricture incidence [18.0% (9/50) vs 45.5% (20/44), P = 0.005]. Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed the association with higher success rates (odds ratio = 4.168, P = 0.045) and lower biliary stricture rates (odds ratio = 0.256, P = 0.007).

Conclusion: Performing ERCP for BDLs within 3 weeks may be associated with a higher success rate and a lower biliary stricture rate. If patients with BDLs do not respond to conservative treatment, ERCP is suggested to be performed within 3 weeks.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信