Enhanced antibacterial effect of blue light in combination with an Amazonian tree sap (Croton lechleri).

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Dieter Manstein, Vanessa Silebi
{"title":"Enhanced antibacterial effect of blue light in combination with an Amazonian tree sap (Croton lechleri).","authors":"Dieter Manstein, Vanessa Silebi","doi":"10.1111/php.14061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, 8.2 million patients suffer from non-healing wounds which are often infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Blue light (BL) and Sangre de Drago (Croton lechleri, SD) have potent mechanisms of antibacterial action through free radical formation and anti-biofilm effect, respectively. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the enhanced antibacterial effect of a novel combination treatment consisting of blue light and Sangre de Drago. Preliminary dosimetry measurements for effective SD concentration (5%) and 415-nm blue LED light fluence (125.3 J/cm<sup>2</sup> with a standard variation of 5 mW) were performed. E. coli K-12 (volume 0.1-mL, concentration 2 × 10<sup>5</sup>CFU/mL) was applied to each of 32 tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates. Inoculated TSA plates were separated into four groups: (1) no treatment (Control), (2) treatment with SD only, (3) treatment with blue light (BL) only, and (4) treatment with both SD and BL. Plates were incubated for 12 h at 37°C. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were analyzed using Image J software and count, size and overal TSA plate coverage were quantified. The median CFU count was highest in the Control group (157.9, interquartile range [IQR]: 112.0-157.9), followed by SD-only (60.5, IQR: 51.6-93.6), BL-only (33.7, IQR: 23.6-45.2), while no bacterial growth was observed in the combination treatment group (0, IQR: 0-0). The median CFU size was largest for control (0.44 mm<sup>2</sup>, IQR: 0.35-0.59 mm<sup>2</sup>), followed by BL-only (0.28 mm<sup>2</sup>, IQR: 0.19-0.43 mm<sup>2</sup>) and SD-only (0.16 mm<sup>2</sup>, IQR: 0.11-0.23 mm<sup>2</sup>). BL-only caused a marked reduction in total CFU count, while the median CFU size was only moderately decreased compared to Control. The significant reduction in CFU count may be due to the bactericidal action of BL on bacteria. Conversely, SD-only caused just a moderate decrease in CFU count but had the largest decrease in median CFU size, indicating a possible strong bacteriostatic mechanism of action by SD. The combination of BL and SD resulted in no bacterial growth. The Bliss independence model demonstrated a Bliss synergy value of 0.04 indicating low synergy between the two treatments, even though its presence was significant (p = 0.001). This initial investigation on the combination treatment using 5% SD and 415-nm BL demonstrates synergy resulting in an enhanced antibacterial effect compared to each treatment alone. Further investigation and validation of these results is required. If validated, this novel combination approach may be translated to clinical practice to help treat chronic wounds infected with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, using non-traditional antimicrobial agents that bypass the most common bacterial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20133,"journal":{"name":"Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/php.14061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, 8.2 million patients suffer from non-healing wounds which are often infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Blue light (BL) and Sangre de Drago (Croton lechleri, SD) have potent mechanisms of antibacterial action through free radical formation and anti-biofilm effect, respectively. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the enhanced antibacterial effect of a novel combination treatment consisting of blue light and Sangre de Drago. Preliminary dosimetry measurements for effective SD concentration (5%) and 415-nm blue LED light fluence (125.3 J/cm2 with a standard variation of 5 mW) were performed. E. coli K-12 (volume 0.1-mL, concentration 2 × 105CFU/mL) was applied to each of 32 tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates. Inoculated TSA plates were separated into four groups: (1) no treatment (Control), (2) treatment with SD only, (3) treatment with blue light (BL) only, and (4) treatment with both SD and BL. Plates were incubated for 12 h at 37°C. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were analyzed using Image J software and count, size and overal TSA plate coverage were quantified. The median CFU count was highest in the Control group (157.9, interquartile range [IQR]: 112.0-157.9), followed by SD-only (60.5, IQR: 51.6-93.6), BL-only (33.7, IQR: 23.6-45.2), while no bacterial growth was observed in the combination treatment group (0, IQR: 0-0). The median CFU size was largest for control (0.44 mm2, IQR: 0.35-0.59 mm2), followed by BL-only (0.28 mm2, IQR: 0.19-0.43 mm2) and SD-only (0.16 mm2, IQR: 0.11-0.23 mm2). BL-only caused a marked reduction in total CFU count, while the median CFU size was only moderately decreased compared to Control. The significant reduction in CFU count may be due to the bactericidal action of BL on bacteria. Conversely, SD-only caused just a moderate decrease in CFU count but had the largest decrease in median CFU size, indicating a possible strong bacteriostatic mechanism of action by SD. The combination of BL and SD resulted in no bacterial growth. The Bliss independence model demonstrated a Bliss synergy value of 0.04 indicating low synergy between the two treatments, even though its presence was significant (p = 0.001). This initial investigation on the combination treatment using 5% SD and 415-nm BL demonstrates synergy resulting in an enhanced antibacterial effect compared to each treatment alone. Further investigation and validation of these results is required. If validated, this novel combination approach may be translated to clinical practice to help treat chronic wounds infected with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, using non-traditional antimicrobial agents that bypass the most common bacterial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance.

蓝光与亚马逊树液(Croton lechleri)结合增强抗菌效果。
在美国,有820万患者患有无法愈合的伤口,这些伤口往往感染了耐抗生素细菌。Blue light (BL)和Sangre de Drago (Croton lechleri, SD)分别通过自由基形成和抗生物膜作用具有较强的抗菌作用机制。本初步研究的目的是评估一种由蓝光和桑格德龙组成的新型联合治疗的增强抗菌效果。对有效SD浓度(5%)和415 nm蓝光LED光通量(125.3 J/cm2,标准变化为5 mW)进行了初步剂量学测量。将大肠杆菌K-12(体积0.1 mL,浓度2 × 105CFU/mL)分别涂于32个胰蛋白酶琼脂(TSA)板上。接种后的TSA板分为四组:(1)不处理(对照),(2)仅SD处理,(3)仅蓝光(BL)处理,(4)SD和BL同时处理。37℃孵育12 h。使用Image J软件分析菌落形成单位(cfu),并对菌落数量、菌落大小和TSA平板覆盖面积进行量化。CFU计数中位数以对照组最高(157.9,四分位间距[IQR]: 112.0 ~ 157.9),其次为SD-only (60.5, IQR: 51.6 ~ 93.6)、BL-only (33.7, IQR: 23.6 ~ 45.2),而联合治疗组未见细菌生长(0,IQR: 0 ~ 0)。对照组的中位CFU大小最大(0.44 mm2, IQR: 0.35-0.59 mm2),其次是单纯bl (0.28 mm2, IQR: 0.19-0.43 mm2)和单纯sd (0.16 mm2, IQR: 0.11-0.23 mm2)。与对照组相比,b - l仅引起CFU总数的显著减少,而CFU大小的中位数仅略有减少。CFU计数的显著减少可能是由于BL对细菌的杀菌作用。相反,SD仅引起CFU计数的适度下降,但CFU中位数大小的下降幅度最大,表明SD可能具有很强的抑菌机制。BL和SD联合使用没有细菌生长。Bliss独立模型显示Bliss协同作用值为0.04,表明两种治疗之间的协同作用较低,尽管其存在显著性(p = 0.001)。对5% SD和415 nm BL联合治疗的初步研究表明,与单独治疗相比,协同作用导致抗菌效果增强。这些结果需要进一步的调查和验证。如果得到验证,这种新的联合方法可能会转化为临床实践,帮助治疗慢性伤口感染的抗微生物耐药细菌,使用非传统的抗微生物药物,绕过最常见的细菌耐药机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Photochemistry and Photobiology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Photochemistry and Photobiology publishes original research articles and reviews on current topics in photoscience. Topics span from the primary interaction of light with molecules, cells, and tissue to the subsequent biological responses, representing disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the fields of chemistry, physics, biology, and medicine. Photochemistry and Photobiology is the official journal of the American Society for Photobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信