Good Results for PJI Caused by Corynebacterium spp. After Algorithmic Surgical Approach and Rifampicin Combination in Implant Retention.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf146
Ana Trebše, Samo Roškar, Anže Mihelič, Rihard Trebše
{"title":"Good Results for PJI Caused by <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. After Algorithmic Surgical Approach and Rifampicin Combination in Implant Retention.","authors":"Ana Trebše, Samo Roškar, Anže Mihelič, Rihard Trebše","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. is a rare culprit in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), with limited data available on outcomes and appropriate treatment course. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of a clinical cohort of patients with PJI, where <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. was the causative organism (CPJI), treated according to an institutional algorithm based upon European Bone and Joint Infection Society guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the institutional bone infection registry, 44 patients treated for CPJI between 2007 and 2023 were identified. CPJIs were divided into 2 groups according to the isolated microbes: monomicrobial (14 [32%]) and polymicrobial (30 [68%]). Patients were treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR; 14 [32%]) or with 1- or 2-stage implant exchange (reimplantation group; 30 [68%]). In 13 (30%) cases, antibiotic combination with rifampicin was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 44 patients, 4 required further treatment. In monomicrobial CPJI, the treatment course was successful in all patients, whereas in polymicrobial CPJI it was successful in 87%. Antibiotic combination including rifampicin was used in 4 monomicrobial cases (29%) and 9 polymicrobial (30%) cases. In the polymicrobial group, DAIR was successful in 90% (9/10), while the reimplantation group had an 85% (17/20) success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast with the previously published papers on CPJI, the results in our cohort were good, with the total cure rate being 91%. The cure rate was slightly lower in the polymicrobial group compared with the monomicrobial: 87% and 100%, respectively. Surgical therapy according to the established institutional algorithm resulted in a high success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 4","pages":"ofaf146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Corynebacterium spp. is a rare culprit in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), with limited data available on outcomes and appropriate treatment course. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of a clinical cohort of patients with PJI, where Corynebacterium spp. was the causative organism (CPJI), treated according to an institutional algorithm based upon European Bone and Joint Infection Society guidelines.

Methods: From the institutional bone infection registry, 44 patients treated for CPJI between 2007 and 2023 were identified. CPJIs were divided into 2 groups according to the isolated microbes: monomicrobial (14 [32%]) and polymicrobial (30 [68%]). Patients were treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR; 14 [32%]) or with 1- or 2-stage implant exchange (reimplantation group; 30 [68%]). In 13 (30%) cases, antibiotic combination with rifampicin was used.

Results: Out of 44 patients, 4 required further treatment. In monomicrobial CPJI, the treatment course was successful in all patients, whereas in polymicrobial CPJI it was successful in 87%. Antibiotic combination including rifampicin was used in 4 monomicrobial cases (29%) and 9 polymicrobial (30%) cases. In the polymicrobial group, DAIR was successful in 90% (9/10), while the reimplantation group had an 85% (17/20) success rate.

Conclusions: In contrast with the previously published papers on CPJI, the results in our cohort were good, with the total cure rate being 91%. The cure rate was slightly lower in the polymicrobial group compared with the monomicrobial: 87% and 100%, respectively. Surgical therapy according to the established institutional algorithm resulted in a high success rate.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信