[Prognosis-guided optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans for lung cancer].

Q3 Medicine
Huali Li, Ting Song, Jiawen Liu, Yongbao Li, Zhaojing Jiang, Wen Dou, Linghong Zhou
{"title":"[Prognosis-guided optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans for lung cancer].","authors":"Huali Li, Ting Song, Jiawen Liu, Yongbao Li, Zhaojing Jiang, Wen Dou, Linghong Zhou","doi":"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.03.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a new method for optimizing radiotherapy planning for lung cancer by incorporating prognostic models that take into account individual patient information and assess the feasibility of treatment planning optimization directly guided by minimizing the predicted prognostic risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed fluence map optimization objective was constructed, incorporating the outcome-based objective and the physical dose constraints. The outcome-based objective function was constructed as an equally weighted summation of prognostic prediction models for local control failure, radiation-induced cardiac toxicity, and radiation pneumonitis considering clinical risk factors. These models were derived using Cox regression analysis or Logistic regression. The primary goal was to minimize the outcome-based objective with the physical dose constraints recommended by the clinical guidelines. The efficacy of the proposed method for optimizing treatment plans was tested in 15 cases of non-small cell lung cancer in comparison with the conventional dose-based optimization method (clinical plan), and the dosimetric indicators and predicted prognostic outcomes were compared between different plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of the dosemetric indicators, D<sub>95%</sub> of the planning target volume obtained using the proposed method was basically consistent with that of the clinical plan (100.33% <i>vs</i> 102.57%, <i>P</i>=0.056), and the average dose of the heart and lungs was significantly decreased from 9.83 Gy and 9.50 Gy to 7.02 Gy (<i>t</i>=4.537, <i>P<</i>0.05) and 8.40 Gy (<i>t</i>=4.104, <i>P<</i>0.05), respectively. The predicted probability of local control failure was similar between the proposed plan and the clinical plan (60.05% <i>vs</i> 59.66%), while the probability of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity was reduced by 1.41% in the proposed plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed optimization method based on a mixed objective function of outcome prediction and physical dose provides effective protection against normal tissue exposure to improve the outcomes of lung cancer patients following radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18962,"journal":{"name":"南方医科大学学报杂志","volume":"45 3","pages":"643-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"南方医科大学学报杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.03.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To propose a new method for optimizing radiotherapy planning for lung cancer by incorporating prognostic models that take into account individual patient information and assess the feasibility of treatment planning optimization directly guided by minimizing the predicted prognostic risk.

Methods: A mixed fluence map optimization objective was constructed, incorporating the outcome-based objective and the physical dose constraints. The outcome-based objective function was constructed as an equally weighted summation of prognostic prediction models for local control failure, radiation-induced cardiac toxicity, and radiation pneumonitis considering clinical risk factors. These models were derived using Cox regression analysis or Logistic regression. The primary goal was to minimize the outcome-based objective with the physical dose constraints recommended by the clinical guidelines. The efficacy of the proposed method for optimizing treatment plans was tested in 15 cases of non-small cell lung cancer in comparison with the conventional dose-based optimization method (clinical plan), and the dosimetric indicators and predicted prognostic outcomes were compared between different plans.

Results: In terms of the dosemetric indicators, D95% of the planning target volume obtained using the proposed method was basically consistent with that of the clinical plan (100.33% vs 102.57%, P=0.056), and the average dose of the heart and lungs was significantly decreased from 9.83 Gy and 9.50 Gy to 7.02 Gy (t=4.537, P<0.05) and 8.40 Gy (t=4.104, P<0.05), respectively. The predicted probability of local control failure was similar between the proposed plan and the clinical plan (60.05% vs 59.66%), while the probability of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity was reduced by 1.41% in the proposed plan.

Conclusions: The proposed optimization method based on a mixed objective function of outcome prediction and physical dose provides effective protection against normal tissue exposure to improve the outcomes of lung cancer patients following radiotherapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
南方医科大学学报杂志
南方医科大学学报杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
208
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信