Machine learning radiomics for H3K27M mutation prediction in gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bardia Hajikarimloo, Salem M Tos, Alireza Kooshki, Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Mohammad Shahir Eftekhar, Arman Hasanzade, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Rana Hashemi, Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh-Esfahani, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Amin Habibi
{"title":"Machine learning radiomics for H3K27M mutation prediction in gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Salem M Tos, Alireza Kooshki, Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Mohammad Shahir Eftekhar, Arman Hasanzade, Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Rana Hashemi, Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh-Esfahani, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03597-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Noninvasive prediction and identification of the H3K27M mutation play an important role in optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving outcomes in gliomas. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML)-based models in predicting H3K27M mutation in gliomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature records were retrieved on September 16th, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies were included in our study. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.97), 92% (95% CI: 83%-96%), and 89% (95% CI: 86%-91%)), respectively. The subgroup meta-analysis revealed that despite the higher sensitivity of the deep learning (DL) models, the sensitivity is not superior to ML (P = 0.6). In contrast, the ML-based pooled specificity was significantly higher (P < 0.01). The meta-analysis revealed a 78.1 (95% CI: 33.3 - 183.5). The SROC curve indicated an AUC of 0.921, and the estimated sensitivity is 0.898 concurrent with the false positive rate of 0.126, which indicates high sensitivity with a low false positive rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that ML-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models are associated with promising diagnostic performance in predicting H3K27M mutation in gliomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03597-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Noninvasive prediction and identification of the H3K27M mutation play an important role in optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving outcomes in gliomas. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML)-based models in predicting H3K27M mutation in gliomas.

Methods: Literature records were retrieved on September 16th, 2024, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Records were screened according to the eligibility criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted using R software.

Results: A total of 15 studies were included in our study. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.97), 92% (95% CI: 83%-96%), and 89% (95% CI: 86%-91%)), respectively. The subgroup meta-analysis revealed that despite the higher sensitivity of the deep learning (DL) models, the sensitivity is not superior to ML (P = 0.6). In contrast, the ML-based pooled specificity was significantly higher (P < 0.01). The meta-analysis revealed a 78.1 (95% CI: 33.3 - 183.5). The SROC curve indicated an AUC of 0.921, and the estimated sensitivity is 0.898 concurrent with the false positive rate of 0.126, which indicates high sensitivity with a low false positive rate.

Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that ML-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models are associated with promising diagnostic performance in predicting H3K27M mutation in gliomas.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信