Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review.

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Alan D McCrorie, Hilary Stobart, David Dodwell, Stuart A McIntosh, Shelley Potter
{"title":"Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Alan D McCrorie, Hilary Stobart, David Dodwell, Stuart A McIntosh, Shelley Potter","doi":"10.1038/s41523-025-00744-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"11 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00744-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

绘制早期乳腺癌局部区域治疗降级试验的现状:一项系统综述。
进行系统审查,以绘制当前地方区域降级试验的景观,为未来的研究提供信息。我们检索了在线数据库和试验注册库,以确定正在进行的、最近完成的或已发表的降低早期乳腺癌患者手术或放疗强度的研究。97项试验评估了94,866名参与者的手术或放疗的降级。外科研究更常评估新辅助全身治疗(NST)和淋巴结治疗降级后的治疗遗漏/减少。放疗研究更常采用生物标志物分层。患者很少参与研究设计。研究问题集中在低或中危疾病患者NST后的反应调整治疗和局部治疗的遗漏/减少。针对类似问题的多个研究发现了显著的重复。这一系统评价表明,目前的降级组合效率低下,缺乏对患者的关注,需要改进。采用创新研究设计和患者伙伴关系的国际合作方法对于解决这一问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信