Perception and reaction of undergraduate critical disability studies students to six short films depicting neuro-advancements.

IF 1.1 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Nanoethics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s11569-025-00467-y
Chiara Salvatore, Sehar Sami, Sandra Youssef, Markus Schmidt, Gregor Wolbring
{"title":"Perception and reaction of undergraduate critical disability studies students to six short films depicting neuro-advancements.","authors":"Chiara Salvatore, Sehar Sami, Sandra Youssef, Markus Schmidt, Gregor Wolbring","doi":"10.1007/s11569-025-00467-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in neurosciences and neurotechnologies pose various ethical and social challenges, warranting public/stakeholder engagement. Art, such as short films, can expose audiences to the social aspects of neuro-advancements. The 2019 BIO·FICTION Film Festival, for instance, examined how neurotechnologies shape society, the human body, and mind. Students are one important group of stakeholders, as they are expected to be critical thinkers and change agents. The lived reality of disabled people is impacted by neuro-advancements in many ways. Critical disability studies students are therefore key stakeholders, as their programs and courses encourage them to identify and address social challenges faced by disabled individuals. Therefore, they need to be able to evaluate the social impacts of neuro-advancements. Few studies exist that ascertain the views of critical disability studies students on the social impact of neuro-advancements. Our study sought to amplify the voices of critical disability studies students by analyzing the responses of 89 undergraduates from three courses to six top films from the BIO·FICTION festival. Conducted asynchronously due to COVID restrictions, students watched the films independently and responded to four guiding questions about: a) general thoughts about the films, b) their perceived impact on those watching, c) implications for their anticipated careers involving disabled people, and d) the social impact of neuro-advancements on disabled people. Our findings indicated that the topical (non-)fictional short films effectively prompted students to reflect on the social aspects of neuro-advancements and were well received. However, responses also indicated a need for follow-up discussions - virtual or in-person - to address questions about film content and deepen the discussion and class engagement. Such discussion setups could also inform film festivals aiming to raise awareness about the societal implications of emerging technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-025-00467-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancements in neurosciences and neurotechnologies pose various ethical and social challenges, warranting public/stakeholder engagement. Art, such as short films, can expose audiences to the social aspects of neuro-advancements. The 2019 BIO·FICTION Film Festival, for instance, examined how neurotechnologies shape society, the human body, and mind. Students are one important group of stakeholders, as they are expected to be critical thinkers and change agents. The lived reality of disabled people is impacted by neuro-advancements in many ways. Critical disability studies students are therefore key stakeholders, as their programs and courses encourage them to identify and address social challenges faced by disabled individuals. Therefore, they need to be able to evaluate the social impacts of neuro-advancements. Few studies exist that ascertain the views of critical disability studies students on the social impact of neuro-advancements. Our study sought to amplify the voices of critical disability studies students by analyzing the responses of 89 undergraduates from three courses to six top films from the BIO·FICTION festival. Conducted asynchronously due to COVID restrictions, students watched the films independently and responded to four guiding questions about: a) general thoughts about the films, b) their perceived impact on those watching, c) implications for their anticipated careers involving disabled people, and d) the social impact of neuro-advancements on disabled people. Our findings indicated that the topical (non-)fictional short films effectively prompted students to reflect on the social aspects of neuro-advancements and were well received. However, responses also indicated a need for follow-up discussions - virtual or in-person - to address questions about film content and deepen the discussion and class engagement. Such discussion setups could also inform film festivals aiming to raise awareness about the societal implications of emerging technologies.

批判性残疾本科生对六部描述神经发展的短片的感知和反应。
神经科学和神经技术的进步带来了各种伦理和社会挑战,需要公众/利益相关者的参与。艺术,如短片,可以向观众展示神经发展的社会方面。例如,2019年的BIO·FICTION电影节考察了神经技术如何塑造社会、人体和心灵。学生是一个重要的利益相关者群体,因为他们被期望成为批判性思考者和变革推动者。残疾人的生活现实在许多方面受到神经进步的影响。因此,残疾研究专业的学生是关键的利益相关者,因为他们的项目和课程鼓励他们识别和解决残疾人面临的社会挑战。因此,他们需要能够评估神经进展的社会影响。很少有研究确定残疾研究专业学生对神经进步的社会影响的看法。我们的研究通过分析89名来自三门课程的本科生对BIO·FICTION电影节上六部顶级电影的反应,试图放大批判性残疾研究学生的声音。由于新冠肺炎疫情的限制,学生们独立观看了这些电影,并回答了四个指导性问题:a)对电影的总体看法,b)对观众的感知影响,c)对他们预期的涉及残疾人的职业的影响,以及d)神经技术进步对残疾人的社会影响。我们的研究结果表明,主题(非)虚构短片有效地促使学生反思神经发展的社会方面,并受到好评。然而,回应也表明需要后续讨论-虚拟或面对面-解决有关电影内容的问题,深化讨论和课堂参与。这样的讨论设置也可以为旨在提高人们对新兴技术的社会影响的认识的电影节提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nanoethics
Nanoethics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale will focus on the philosophically and scientifically rigorous examination of the ethical and societal considerations and the public and policy concerns inherent in nanotechnology research and development. These issues include both individual and societal problems, and include individual health, wellbeing and human enhancement, human integrity and autonomy, distribution of the costs and benefits, threats to culture and tradition and to political and economic stability. Additionally there are meta-issues including the neutrality or otherwise of technology, designing technology in a value-sensitive way, and the control of scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信