Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy versus reperfusion therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Gabriel de Almeida Monteiro, Marianna Leite, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Antonio Mutarelli, Gabriel Marinheiro, Beatriz Araujo, Paulo Roberto Lacerda Leal, Espartaco Moraes Lima Ribeiro, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, João Paulo Mota Telles
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy versus reperfusion therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Gabriel de Almeida Monteiro, Marianna Leite, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Antonio Mutarelli, Gabriel Marinheiro, Beatriz Araujo, Paulo Roberto Lacerda Leal, Espartaco Moraes Lima Ribeiro, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, João Paulo Mota Telles","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03094-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies have shown an additional benefit of tirofiban administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who underwent reperfusion therapy. According to the last revised guidelines, the efficacy of tirofiban in treating AIS is not well-established. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy with tirofiban compared to reperfusion therapy alone in treating AIS. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the use of tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy in AIS patients within 72 h after the onset of symptoms with 90 days minimum follow-up. We employed risk ratio (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the measure of effect size using a random-effects model. We included seven RCTs comprising 1607 patients, of whom 815 (50.7%) received tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy and 792 (49.3%) received reperfusion therapy alone (no-tirofiban). The addition of tirofiban to the reperfusion therapy resulted in a higher rate of favorable outcomes (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.40; p < 0.001) with less functional disability (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.98; p < 0.05). The administration of tirofiban significantly improved the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after seven days (MD - 2.27; 95% CI - 4.32 to - 0.22; p = 0.03). A similar rate of successful revascularization was observed between groups (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.97-1.45; p = 0.09). Tirofiban did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.98-2.19; p = 0.06), but increase the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), particularly in the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) subgroup analysis (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03-1.51; p = 0.02). Mortality rates were similar between groups RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.38; p = 0.72). The addition of tirofiban to reperfusion therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes, without a significant increase in ICH. NIHSS after seven days of stroke onset was significantly improved by tirofiban. There was an increase in any ICH events, particularly in EVT patients. Mortality was not significantly altered by tirofiban.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"526-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03094-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several studies have shown an additional benefit of tirofiban administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who underwent reperfusion therapy. According to the last revised guidelines, the efficacy of tirofiban in treating AIS is not well-established. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy with tirofiban compared to reperfusion therapy alone in treating AIS. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the use of tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy in AIS patients within 72 h after the onset of symptoms with 90 days minimum follow-up. We employed risk ratio (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the measure of effect size using a random-effects model. We included seven RCTs comprising 1607 patients, of whom 815 (50.7%) received tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy and 792 (49.3%) received reperfusion therapy alone (no-tirofiban). The addition of tirofiban to the reperfusion therapy resulted in a higher rate of favorable outcomes (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.40; p < 0.001) with less functional disability (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.98; p < 0.05). The administration of tirofiban significantly improved the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after seven days (MD - 2.27; 95% CI - 4.32 to - 0.22; p = 0.03). A similar rate of successful revascularization was observed between groups (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.97-1.45; p = 0.09). Tirofiban did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.98-2.19; p = 0.06), but increase the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), particularly in the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) subgroup analysis (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03-1.51; p = 0.02). Mortality rates were similar between groups RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.38; p = 0.72). The addition of tirofiban to reperfusion therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes, without a significant increase in ICH. NIHSS after seven days of stroke onset was significantly improved by tirofiban. There was an increase in any ICH events, particularly in EVT patients. Mortality was not significantly altered by tirofiban.
几项研究表明,替罗非班对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者进行再灌注治疗有额外的益处。根据最新修订的指南,替罗非班治疗AIS的疗效尚未得到证实。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估替罗非班再灌注治疗与单独再灌注治疗治疗AIS的疗效和安全性。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,以获取报告AIS患者在症状出现后72小时内使用替罗非班联合再灌注治疗的随机对照试验(rct),随访时间最少为90天。我们采用随机效应模型,采用95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(RR)和平均差异(MD)作为效应大小的度量。我们纳入了7项随机对照试验,共1607例患者,其中815例(50.7%)接受替罗非班联合再灌注治疗,792例(49.3%)接受单独再灌注治疗(不使用替罗非班)。在再灌注治疗中加入替罗非班可导致更高的有利转归率(RR 1.25;95% ci 1.11-1.40;p
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care.
The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.