Comparative efficacy of low-level diode laser therapy with different wavelengths in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, single-blind trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xiao-Li Ge, Chen Sun, Ran Zhao, Hai-Yan Wang, Wei-Wen Jiang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of low-level diode laser therapy with different wavelengths in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, single-blind trial.","authors":"Xiao-Li Ge, Chen Sun, Ran Zhao, Hai-Yan Wang, Wei-Wen Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04403-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic condition with no effective treatment currently available. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) shows promise for neuropathic pain management, but evidence comparing its efficacy across different wavelengths in BMS patients remains limited. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of LLLT with three distinct wavelengths in BMS patients, and to determine the optimal therapeutic wavelength. This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial, with blinding applied only to the participants. 201 participants were scheduled for enrollment, divided into three groups with 67 individuals each. Finally, 63 participants with BMS were enrolled from April 2019 to December 2022, with 53 completing the study. Randomization was performed using SPSS software to generate random numbers. Participants were sequentially assigned based on their enrollment order to the 660 nm group (n = 10, 50 mW, 1.5 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 s/point), 810 nm group (n = 26, 500 mW, 3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, 6 s/point), or 975 nm group (n = 17, 30 mW, 10 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, 33 s/point). Each participant underwent LLLT once a week for 4 sessions. Outcomes, including pain intensity, numbness, and altered taste, were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Efficacy was assessed by comparing VAS scores at baseline and after the last treatment, using the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons among the three groups and the Mann-Whitney U-test for pairwise analysis. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen's d. Statistically significant pain relief was observed in all groups (median reduction of 40%). The improvement of numbness in the 810 nm and 975 nm groups (median reduction of 40%) was also significant (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in efficacy were noted among the three groups (p > 0.05). These results suggested that LLLT with three different wavelengths effectively reduced pain and that the 810 nm and 975 nm wavelengths also significantly alleviated numbness in BMS patients. However, further investigation is warranted to elucidate any potential differences in efficacy among the three groups. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR1900021674 (March 5, 2019).</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04403-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic condition with no effective treatment currently available. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) shows promise for neuropathic pain management, but evidence comparing its efficacy across different wavelengths in BMS patients remains limited. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of LLLT with three distinct wavelengths in BMS patients, and to determine the optimal therapeutic wavelength. This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial, with blinding applied only to the participants. 201 participants were scheduled for enrollment, divided into three groups with 67 individuals each. Finally, 63 participants with BMS were enrolled from April 2019 to December 2022, with 53 completing the study. Randomization was performed using SPSS software to generate random numbers. Participants were sequentially assigned based on their enrollment order to the 660 nm group (n = 10, 50 mW, 1.5 J/cm2, 30 s/point), 810 nm group (n = 26, 500 mW, 3 J/cm2, 6 s/point), or 975 nm group (n = 17, 30 mW, 10 J/cm2, 33 s/point). Each participant underwent LLLT once a week for 4 sessions. Outcomes, including pain intensity, numbness, and altered taste, were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Efficacy was assessed by comparing VAS scores at baseline and after the last treatment, using the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons among the three groups and the Mann-Whitney U-test for pairwise analysis. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen's d. Statistically significant pain relief was observed in all groups (median reduction of 40%). The improvement of numbness in the 810 nm and 975 nm groups (median reduction of 40%) was also significant (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in efficacy were noted among the three groups (p > 0.05). These results suggested that LLLT with three different wavelengths effectively reduced pain and that the 810 nm and 975 nm wavelengths also significantly alleviated numbness in BMS patients. However, further investigation is warranted to elucidate any potential differences in efficacy among the three groups. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR1900021674 (March 5, 2019).

不同波长低能级二极管激光治疗灼口综合征的比较疗效:一项随机、单盲试验。
灼口综合征(BMS)是一种慢性疾病,目前尚无有效治疗方法。低水平激光治疗(LLLT)显示出对神经性疼痛管理的希望,但比较不同波长对BMS患者的疗效的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估三种不同波长LLLT治疗BMS患者的临床疗效,并确定最佳治疗波长。本研究为单盲随机对照试验,仅对受试者采用盲法。201名参与者被安排入组,分为三组,每组67人。最后,从2019年4月到2022年12月,研究人员招募了63名BMS患者,其中53人完成了研究。随机化采用SPSS软件生成随机数。参与者根据入组顺序被分配到660 nm组(n = 10、50 mW, 1.5 J/cm2, 30秒/点)、810 nm组(n = 26、500 mW, 3 J/cm2, 6秒/点)或975 nm组(n = 17、30 mW, 10 J/cm2, 33秒/点)。每位参与者每周进行1次LLLT,共4次。结果包括疼痛强度、麻木和味觉改变,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。通过比较基线和末次治疗后的VAS评分来评估疗效,三组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,两两分析采用Mann-Whitney u检验。使用Cohen’s d报告效应量。在所有组中均观察到统计学上显著的疼痛缓解(中位数减少40%)。810 nm组和975 nm组的麻木改善也很显著(中位数减少40%)(p 0.05)。结果表明,三种不同波长的LLLT有效减轻了BMS患者的疼痛,810 nm和975 nm波长的LLLT也显著减轻了BMS患者的麻木。然而,需要进一步的研究来阐明三组之间疗效的潜在差异。临床试验注册:ChiCTR1900021674(2019年3月5日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信