Alireza Jafarzadeh, Sama Heidari, Reza Omid, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"Systematic review of vascular lasers for the treatment of inflammatory active acne vulgaris.","authors":"Alireza Jafarzadeh, Sama Heidari, Reza Omid, Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04429-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acne vulgaris is a prevalent skin disorder with significant emotional and psychological impacts. Conventional treatments often have limitations, prompting exploration into alternative therapies like vascular lasers and light treatments. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of vascular lasers (IPL, PDL, Nd:YAG) on inflammatory acne lesions associated with acne vulgaris. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from 2010 to 2024 were searched in databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase) using preset terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed English language studies on vascular lasers for inflammatory acne lesions in comparative and randomized controlled trials. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient data, laser parameters, and treatment outcomes. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. Out of 904 initially retrieved studies, 32 studies involving 1,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies focused on 18 Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), 9 Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL), and 10 Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers, with 5 studies comparing two modalities. IPL demonstrated acne vulgaris lesion reduction rates ranging from 42.40% to 61.56%, while PDL achieved reductions of up to 82.5%. Combined therapies, such as PDL/Nd:YAG, resulted in reductions as high as 83.5%. Fractional CO₂ lasers showed acne vulgaris lesion improvement rates of 87.94% ± 14.31, with sustained results at follow-up. Red light-PDT achieved an 85.50% ± 5.39 reduction, outperforming IPL-PDT (75.55% ± 8.09). In comparative studies, Nd:YAG lasers demonstrated slightly superior outcomes over IPL. Adverse effects, including erythema and pain, were generally mild, with severe side effects being rare. Vascular lasers, including IPL, PDL, and Nd:YAG, demonstrate significant efficacy and safety in treating inflammatory active acne vulgaris, with combination therapies often showing superior outcomes. Fractional CO₂ lasers and red light-PDT further expand treatment options. Adverse effects, such as erythema and pain, are generally mild and transient. However, variability in study protocols highlights the need for standardized treatment guidelines and further well-designed trials to optimize protocols and ensure consistent, long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04429-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a prevalent skin disorder with significant emotional and psychological impacts. Conventional treatments often have limitations, prompting exploration into alternative therapies like vascular lasers and light treatments. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of vascular lasers (IPL, PDL, Nd:YAG) on inflammatory acne lesions associated with acne vulgaris. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from 2010 to 2024 were searched in databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase) using preset terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed English language studies on vascular lasers for inflammatory acne lesions in comparative and randomized controlled trials. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient data, laser parameters, and treatment outcomes. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. Out of 904 initially retrieved studies, 32 studies involving 1,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies focused on 18 Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), 9 Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL), and 10 Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers, with 5 studies comparing two modalities. IPL demonstrated acne vulgaris lesion reduction rates ranging from 42.40% to 61.56%, while PDL achieved reductions of up to 82.5%. Combined therapies, such as PDL/Nd:YAG, resulted in reductions as high as 83.5%. Fractional CO₂ lasers showed acne vulgaris lesion improvement rates of 87.94% ± 14.31, with sustained results at follow-up. Red light-PDT achieved an 85.50% ± 5.39 reduction, outperforming IPL-PDT (75.55% ± 8.09). In comparative studies, Nd:YAG lasers demonstrated slightly superior outcomes over IPL. Adverse effects, including erythema and pain, were generally mild, with severe side effects being rare. Vascular lasers, including IPL, PDL, and Nd:YAG, demonstrate significant efficacy and safety in treating inflammatory active acne vulgaris, with combination therapies often showing superior outcomes. Fractional CO₂ lasers and red light-PDT further expand treatment options. Adverse effects, such as erythema and pain, are generally mild and transient. However, variability in study protocols highlights the need for standardized treatment guidelines and further well-designed trials to optimize protocols and ensure consistent, long-term outcomes.
寻常痤疮是一种普遍的皮肤疾病,具有显著的情绪和心理影响。常规治疗通常有局限性,这促使人们探索血管激光和光治疗等替代疗法。本系统综述评价血管激光(IPL, PDL, Nd:YAG)治疗寻常痤疮相关炎症性痤疮病变的疗效和安全性。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。在数据库(Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase)中使用预设术语检索2010年至2024年的研究。纳入标准包括比较和随机对照试验中血管激光治疗炎性痤疮病变的英语研究。数据提取包括研究特征、患者资料、激光参数和治疗结果。质量评价采用Cochrane ROB 2工具。在904项最初检索的研究中,32项涉及1520名患者的研究符合纳入标准。研究集中在18个强脉冲光(IPL), 9个脉冲染料激光(PDL)和10个掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光器上,其中5个研究比较了两种模式。IPL的寻常痤疮病变减少率为42.40% ~ 61.56%,而PDL的减少率高达82.5%。联合治疗,如PDL/Nd:YAG,导致减少高达83.5%。分数CO₂激光对寻常痤疮病变的改善率为87.94%±14.31,随访结果持续。红光- pdt降低85.50%±5.39,优于IPL-PDT(75.55%±8.09)。在比较研究中,Nd:YAG激光器表现出略优于IPL的结果。不良反应,包括红斑和疼痛,通常是轻微的,严重的副作用是罕见的。血管激光,包括IPL, PDL和Nd:YAG,在治疗炎性活动性寻常性痤疮方面显示出显著的有效性和安全性,联合治疗通常显示出更好的结果。分数CO₂激光器和红光pdt进一步扩大了治疗选择。不良反应,如红斑和疼痛,通常是轻微和短暂的。然而,研究方案的可变性强调了标准化治疗指南和进一步精心设计的试验的必要性,以优化方案并确保一致的长期结果。
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.