Scientometric analysis of research productivity in clinical pharmacy and practice: a 12-year review at a Middle Eastern university.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2480154
Ikram Zoukh, Myrna Tabet, Ahmed Awaisu
{"title":"Scientometric analysis of research productivity in clinical pharmacy and practice: a 12-year review at a Middle Eastern university.","authors":"Ikram Zoukh, Myrna Tabet, Ahmed Awaisu","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2480154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing faculty research productivity through scientometric analysis is crucial for academic institutions to promote and enhance research activities. Scientometric analysis guides institutional goals, identifies gaps and faculty contributions, and influences career development in academia. With advancements in the clinical pharmacy and practice field and Qatar's evolving research infrastructure, this study aimed to evaluate the research productivity and quality indicators of a clinical pharmacy and practice department at Qatar University through scientometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research articles published between 2012 and 2024 were retrieved using Web of Science (WoS) via InCites, Scopus via SciVal, and Google Scholar. Metrics analysed included total publications, journal impact factor, Q ranking, subject area coverage, and collaborations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one faculty members produced 1,266 articles indexed in WoS, 1,270 in Scopus, and 1,737 in Google Scholar. The average annual publication rate was 5 articles per faculty member, resulting to an average of 41 publications per faculty member over their tenure. Active publication years accounted for 85% of faculty tenures. Furthermore, research output and productivity increased steadily, with the highest publication output observed between 2021 and 2023. Most publications appeared in journals with Q1 or Q2 rankings, with the <i>International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy</i> and <i>Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy</i> being the most frequently targeted outlets. Publications covered diverse topics and subject areas, including pharmacy practice, health education, patient and medication safety, and chronic disease management. Database comparisons revealed differences in retrieval rates, journal impact indicators, and Q-rankings, with Google Scholar having the highest retrieval rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scientometric analysis highlights the research contributions and growth trajectory of clinical pharmacy and practice faculty, emphasising quality and opportunities for future advancements. The findings provide a benchmark for regional and global trends in clinical pharmacy research and offer actionable insights for researchers, academic institutions, and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2480154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2480154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing faculty research productivity through scientometric analysis is crucial for academic institutions to promote and enhance research activities. Scientometric analysis guides institutional goals, identifies gaps and faculty contributions, and influences career development in academia. With advancements in the clinical pharmacy and practice field and Qatar's evolving research infrastructure, this study aimed to evaluate the research productivity and quality indicators of a clinical pharmacy and practice department at Qatar University through scientometric analysis.

Methods: Research articles published between 2012 and 2024 were retrieved using Web of Science (WoS) via InCites, Scopus via SciVal, and Google Scholar. Metrics analysed included total publications, journal impact factor, Q ranking, subject area coverage, and collaborations.

Results: Thirty-one faculty members produced 1,266 articles indexed in WoS, 1,270 in Scopus, and 1,737 in Google Scholar. The average annual publication rate was 5 articles per faculty member, resulting to an average of 41 publications per faculty member over their tenure. Active publication years accounted for 85% of faculty tenures. Furthermore, research output and productivity increased steadily, with the highest publication output observed between 2021 and 2023. Most publications appeared in journals with Q1 or Q2 rankings, with the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy being the most frequently targeted outlets. Publications covered diverse topics and subject areas, including pharmacy practice, health education, patient and medication safety, and chronic disease management. Database comparisons revealed differences in retrieval rates, journal impact indicators, and Q-rankings, with Google Scholar having the highest retrieval rate.

Conclusion: This scientometric analysis highlights the research contributions and growth trajectory of clinical pharmacy and practice faculty, emphasising quality and opportunities for future advancements. The findings provide a benchmark for regional and global trends in clinical pharmacy research and offer actionable insights for researchers, academic institutions, and policymakers.

临床药学和实践研究效率的科学计量分析:一所中东大学的12年回顾。
背景:通过科学计量分析来评估教师的研究生产力对于学术机构促进和加强研究活动至关重要。科学计量学分析指导机构目标,确定差距和教师贡献,并影响学术界的职业发展。随着临床药学和实践领域的进步以及卡塔尔不断发展的研究基础设施,本研究旨在通过科学计量分析来评估卡塔尔大学临床药学和实践部门的研究生产力和质量指标。方法:通过InCites检索Web of Science (WoS),通过SciVal检索Scopus,通过谷歌Scholar检索2012 - 2024年间发表的研究论文。分析的指标包括出版物总量、期刊影响因子、Q排名、学科领域覆盖范围和合作情况。结果:31位教师共发表了1266篇论文被WoS收录,1270篇被Scopus收录,1737篇被谷歌Scholar收录。平均年发表率为每位教员5篇文章,因此每位教员在其任期内平均发表41篇文章。活跃出版年限占教师任期的85%。此外,研究产出和生产力稳步增长,在2021年至2023年期间观察到最高的出版物产出。大多数出版物出现在排名第一或第二的期刊上,其中《国际临床药学杂志》和《社会与行政药学研究》是最常见的目标渠道。出版物涵盖各种主题和学科领域,包括药房实践、健康教育、患者和药物安全以及慢性病管理。数据库比较揭示了检索率、期刊影响指标和q排名的差异,b谷歌Scholar的检索率最高。结论:这一科学计量分析突出了临床药学和实践教师的研究贡献和发展轨迹,强调了质量和未来发展的机会。这些发现为临床药学研究的区域和全球趋势提供了基准,并为研究人员、学术机构和政策制定者提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信