Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management Systems: A Scoping Review of Mental Health Support Provided to Healthcare Workers.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jargalmaa Amarsanaa, Oyundari Batsaikhan, Badamtsetseg Jargalsaikhan, Tatsuhiko Kubo, Nader Ghotbi, Ryoma Kayano, Odgerel Chimed-Ochir
{"title":"Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management Systems: A Scoping Review of Mental Health Support Provided to Healthcare Workers.","authors":"Jargalmaa Amarsanaa, Oyundari Batsaikhan, Badamtsetseg Jargalsaikhan, Tatsuhiko Kubo, Nader Ghotbi, Ryoma Kayano, Odgerel Chimed-Ochir","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic scoping review examined the strategies used by different countries and institutions to support the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19, to identify effective practices and the lessons learned in dealing with the associated challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of 1330 retrieved articles from PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science, 34 articles were ultimately included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that mental health consultation services, especially telephone support lines, online interventions, and apps played a critical role in addressing the psychological burden experienced by HCWs. Group activities and peer support strategies offered personalized support, and educational programs offered crucial information regarding stress management. Improvements in the work environment, such as the addition of dedicated rest areas, enhanced the well-being of HCWs. However, many interventions suffered from low participation and a lack of tailored content, despite their apparent effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many interventions have focused on psychological support and resilience-building for HCWs, but they often overlook systemic issues. Comprehensive mental health support must address these systemic factors, such as adequate staffing, training, and resource allocation. Future strategies should emphasize leadership commitment to tackling root causes and actively involve HCWs in program design to ensure relevance and effectiveness. Educational resources and wellness interventions, while reported as effective, need to be tailored and adapted to specific emergencies. Additionally, research gaps, especially in low-resource settings, highlight the need for further studies to enhance preparedness for future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic scoping review examined the strategies used by different countries and institutions to support the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19, to identify effective practices and the lessons learned in dealing with the associated challenges.

Methods: Out of 1330 retrieved articles from PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science, 34 articles were ultimately included in the final analysis.

Results: The analysis revealed that mental health consultation services, especially telephone support lines, online interventions, and apps played a critical role in addressing the psychological burden experienced by HCWs. Group activities and peer support strategies offered personalized support, and educational programs offered crucial information regarding stress management. Improvements in the work environment, such as the addition of dedicated rest areas, enhanced the well-being of HCWs. However, many interventions suffered from low participation and a lack of tailored content, despite their apparent effectiveness.

Conclusion: Many interventions have focused on psychological support and resilience-building for HCWs, but they often overlook systemic issues. Comprehensive mental health support must address these systemic factors, such as adequate staffing, training, and resource allocation. Future strategies should emphasize leadership commitment to tackling root causes and actively involve HCWs in program design to ensure relevance and effectiveness. Educational resources and wellness interventions, while reported as effective, need to be tailored and adapted to specific emergencies. Additionally, research gaps, especially in low-resource settings, highlight the need for further studies to enhance preparedness for future crises.

目标:本系统性综述研究了不同国家和机构在 COVID-19 期间为支持医护人员(HCWs)的心理健康所采取的策略,以确定在应对相关挑战时的有效做法和经验教训:在从 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 检索到的 1330 篇文章中,最终有 34 篇文章被纳入最终分析:分析结果显示,心理健康咨询服务,尤其是电话支持热线、在线干预和应用程序在解决高危护理人员的心理负担方面发挥了关键作用。小组活动和同伴支持策略提供了个性化支持,而教育计划则提供了有关压力管理的重要信息。工作环境的改善,如增设专用休息区,也提高了高危护理人员的幸福感。然而,许多干预措施尽管效果明显,但却存在参与度低、内容缺乏针对性等问题:结论:许多干预措施都侧重于为高危护理人员提供心理支持和建立复原力,但它们往往忽视了系统性问题。全面的心理健康支持必须解决这些系统性因素,如充足的人员配备、培训和资源分配。未来的战略应强调领导层对解决根本原因的承诺,并让高危工作者积极参与项目设计,以确保项目的相关性和有效性。据报道,教育资源和健康干预措施虽然有效,但需要根据具体的紧急情况进行定制和调整。此外,研究缺口(尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中)凸显了进一步研究的必要性,以加强对未来危机的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信