Pramipexole Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression Not Responding to Aripiprazole Augmentation: An Observational Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001986
Antonio Tundo, Sophia Betro', Rocco de Filippis, Roberto Felici, Chiara Lucangeli, Marica Iommi
{"title":"Pramipexole Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression Not Responding to Aripiprazole Augmentation: An Observational Study.","authors":"Antonio Tundo, Sophia Betro', Rocco de Filippis, Roberto Felici, Chiara Lucangeli, Marica Iommi","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At least 50% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) fail to respond to antidepressant augmentation with aripiprazole (AA), currently the augmentation strategy with the best evidence of efficacy. The present observational study investigated whether pramipexole augmentation (PA) might be useful for patients who failed AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of PA in 81 consecutively recruited unipolar patients with TRD, 58 (71.6%) not previously treated with AA (UAA) and 23 (28.4%) who previously failed AA (FAA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FAA and UAA groups did not differ significantly in terms of remission, response, improvement, and general functioning at 12 and 24 weeks and in terms of freedom from relapse at 12 and 24 months. The response rates at 24 weeks were 69.6% (n = 16) and 77.6% (n = 45), and the remission rates were 60.9% (n = 14) and 74.1% (n = 43), respectively. The rates of sustained response at 24 months were 72.7% (n = 8) and 84.2% (n = 16), respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly on safety outcomes (acceptability, tolerability, suicidality and suicide attempts) in the short and long term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed that the off-label use of PA may be a promising treatment for patients with unipolar TRD who had previously failed respond to AA. The present findings are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution due to study limitations, including the flexibility of the add-on schedule and the small sample size of patients followed up for 12 and 24 months, and need to be confirmed in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"236-242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At least 50% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) fail to respond to antidepressant augmentation with aripiprazole (AA), currently the augmentation strategy with the best evidence of efficacy. The present observational study investigated whether pramipexole augmentation (PA) might be useful for patients who failed AA.

Methods: We compared the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of PA in 81 consecutively recruited unipolar patients with TRD, 58 (71.6%) not previously treated with AA (UAA) and 23 (28.4%) who previously failed AA (FAA).

Results: The FAA and UAA groups did not differ significantly in terms of remission, response, improvement, and general functioning at 12 and 24 weeks and in terms of freedom from relapse at 12 and 24 months. The response rates at 24 weeks were 69.6% (n = 16) and 77.6% (n = 45), and the remission rates were 60.9% (n = 14) and 74.1% (n = 43), respectively. The rates of sustained response at 24 months were 72.7% (n = 8) and 84.2% (n = 16), respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly on safety outcomes (acceptability, tolerability, suicidality and suicide attempts) in the short and long term.

Conclusions: Our study showed that the off-label use of PA may be a promising treatment for patients with unipolar TRD who had previously failed respond to AA. The present findings are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution due to study limitations, including the flexibility of the add-on schedule and the small sample size of patients followed up for 12 and 24 months, and need to be confirmed in larger studies.

阿立哌唑增强治疗对难治性单极抑郁症无效:一项观察性研究。
背景:至少50%的难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者对阿立哌唑(AA)增强抗抑郁药无效,阿立哌唑是目前疗效最好的增强策略。本观察性研究调查了普拉克索增强(PA)是否对AA失败的患者有用。方法:我们比较了81例连续招募的单极TRD患者中PA的短期和长期有效性和安全性,其中58例(71.6%)未接受过AA治疗(UAA), 23例(28.4%)曾接受过AA治疗(FAA)。结果:FAA组和UAA组在12周和24周的缓解、反应、改善和一般功能以及12个月和24个月的复发自由方面没有显著差异。治疗24周时的有效率分别为69.6% (n = 16)和77.6% (n = 45),缓解率分别为60.9% (n = 14)和74.1% (n = 43)。24个月的持续缓解率分别为72.7% (n = 8)和84.2% (n = 16)。两组在短期和长期的安全性结果(可接受性、耐受性、自杀倾向和自杀企图)上没有显著差异。结论:我们的研究表明,对于之前对AA治疗无效的单极TRD患者,非说明书使用PA可能是一种有希望的治疗方法。目前的研究结果是初步的,由于研究的局限性,包括附加计划的灵活性和患者随访12个月和24个月的小样本量,需要在更大规模的研究中得到证实,因此应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信