Quality Evaluation of Qingwei Huanglian Pills Based on Fingerprint and Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Index Components Combined with Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Xiaowei Shao, Nan Zhao, Yuping Li, Hongming Wang, Xueli Xu, Shuyue Wang
{"title":"Quality Evaluation of Qingwei Huanglian Pills Based on Fingerprint and Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Index Components Combined with Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis.","authors":"Xiaowei Shao, Nan Zhao, Yuping Li, Hongming Wang, Xueli Xu, Shuyue Wang","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qingwei Huanglian Pills (QHPs) is one of the most commonly used traditional Chinese medicine preparations for the treatment of mouth and tongue sores, but the existing quality evaluation standards have certain shortcomings and deficiencies. An effective and scientific quality evaluation method plays a vital role in medication safety. In this study, fingerprint and quantitative analysis of multi-index components combined with chemical pattern recognition analysis was used to comprehensively evaluate the quality of QHPs. The fingerprints of 15 batches of QHPs were generated and evaluated for similarity, with 10 characteristic peaks identified. Clustering hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were employed to cluster and rank the 15 batches, while simultaneously identifying the components responsible for differences between batches. The HPLC fingerprints of QHPs, along with the content determination of 10 components, were established. Twenty-eight common peaks were identified, and 10 components were specified. The similarity between the 15 batches of samples ranged from 0.983 to 0.999. Cluster analysis and comprehensive score ranking of 15 batches of samples were performed by HCA and PCA, respectively, and 13 chemical markers affecting batch differences were screened by OPLS-DA. The method established here can serve as a reference for the quality evaluation and product quality control of QHPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chromatographic science","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chromatographic science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qingwei Huanglian Pills (QHPs) is one of the most commonly used traditional Chinese medicine preparations for the treatment of mouth and tongue sores, but the existing quality evaluation standards have certain shortcomings and deficiencies. An effective and scientific quality evaluation method plays a vital role in medication safety. In this study, fingerprint and quantitative analysis of multi-index components combined with chemical pattern recognition analysis was used to comprehensively evaluate the quality of QHPs. The fingerprints of 15 batches of QHPs were generated and evaluated for similarity, with 10 characteristic peaks identified. Clustering hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were employed to cluster and rank the 15 batches, while simultaneously identifying the components responsible for differences between batches. The HPLC fingerprints of QHPs, along with the content determination of 10 components, were established. Twenty-eight common peaks were identified, and 10 components were specified. The similarity between the 15 batches of samples ranged from 0.983 to 0.999. Cluster analysis and comprehensive score ranking of 15 batches of samples were performed by HCA and PCA, respectively, and 13 chemical markers affecting batch differences were screened by OPLS-DA. The method established here can serve as a reference for the quality evaluation and product quality control of QHPs.

基于指纹图谱和多指标成分定量分析结合化学模式识别分析的清胃黄连丸质量评价。
清胃黄连丸是治疗口腔和舌头溃疡最常用的中药制剂之一,但现有的质量评价标准存在一定的缺陷和不足。有效、科学的质量评价方法对药品安全起着至关重要的作用。本研究采用指纹图谱和多指标组分定量分析相结合的化学模式识别分析方法对qhp的质量进行综合评价。对15批qhp的指纹图谱进行相似性评价,鉴定出10个特征峰。采用聚类层次聚类分析(HCA)、主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA)对15个批次进行聚类和排序,同时识别造成批次间差异的成分。建立了qhp的HPLC指纹图谱,并对其中10种成分进行了含量测定。鉴定出28个共同峰,并指定了10个组分。15批样品的相似度范围为0.983 ~ 0.999。分别采用HCA和PCA对15批样品进行聚类分析和综合评分排序,并通过OPLS-DA筛选13个影响批次差异的化学标记物。所建立的方法可为qhp的质量评价和产品质量控制提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatographic Science is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning all methods of chromatographic analysis. The standard manuscript is a description of recent original research that covers any or all phases of a specific separation problem, principle, or method. Manuscripts which have a high degree of novelty and fundamental significance to the field of separation science are particularly encouraged. It is expected the authors will clearly state in the Introduction how their method compares in some markedly new and improved way to previous published related methods. Analytical performance characteristics of new methods including sensitivity, tested limits of detection or quantification, accuracy, precision, and specificity should be provided. Manuscripts which describe a straightforward extension of a known analytical method or an application to a previously analyzed and/or uncomplicated sample matrix will not normally be reviewed favorably. Manuscripts in which mass spectrometry is the dominant analytical method and chromatography is of marked secondary importance may be declined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信