Ultrasound-MRI Agreement in Individuals Undergoing Surveillance of Fontan-associated Liver Disease.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Harris Wang, Derek Rubadeux, Andrew T Trout, Cara E Morin, Alexander R Opotowsky, Alexandra Glenn, Joseph J Palermo, Khurram Bari, Jonathan R Dillman
{"title":"Ultrasound-MRI Agreement in Individuals Undergoing Surveillance of Fontan-associated Liver Disease.","authors":"Harris Wang, Derek Rubadeux, Andrew T Trout, Cara E Morin, Alexander R Opotowsky, Alexandra Glenn, Joseph J Palermo, Khurram Bari, Jonathan R Dillman","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess agreement between abdominal ultrasound and MRI for the detection of focal liver lesions and manifestations of portal hypertension in patients with Fontan circulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To perform this single-center, retrospective study, we identified patients with Fontan circulation who underwent clinical abdominal ultrasound and MRI examinations within ±12 months between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023. Imaging reports were reviewed for the presence of liver lesions (specifically noting lesions >1 cm and radiologist-indicated suspicious lesions), features of portal hypertension (ie, presence of ascites and spleen length), abnormal liver contour, and liver stiffness. Intermodality agreement, sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound relative to MRI, and Spearman correlation were used to compare ultrasound and MRI measurements. Follow-up of detected lesions was also performed using electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58 patients included. Agreement between MRI and ultrasound for the findings of Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) was as follows: presence of a liver lesion of any size [k = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.32)], presence of a liver lesion >1 cm [k = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.68)], radiologist-indicated suspicious liver lesion(s) [k = 0.07 (95% CI: -0.13 to 0.27)], presence of ascites [k = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.81)], abnormal liver contour [k = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.59)], and spleen length [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.92)]. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound using MRI as the reference standard were as follows: 34% (95% CI: 20% to 50%) and 100% (95% CI: 77% to 100%) for the presence of a liver lesion of any size, and 39% (95% CI: 17% to 64%) and 98% (95% CI: 87% to 100%) for the presence of a liver lesion >1 cm. There was a poor correlation between ultrasound and MRI liver stiffness measurements [rho = 0.22 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.53); P = 0.23]. Of 44 patients with liver lesions, 3 (6.8%) had biopsy-confirmed hepatocellular neoplasms, including 2 adenomas and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma. All 3 lesions were detected by both MRI and ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is poor to fair agreement between ultrasound and MRI for detecting manifestations of FALD, with ultrasound having poor sensitivity compared with MRI. While ultrasound detected all 3 clinically important liver lesions in our study, our results raise questions about whether ultrasound is an appropriate screening tool for FALD in patients post-Fontan.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess agreement between abdominal ultrasound and MRI for the detection of focal liver lesions and manifestations of portal hypertension in patients with Fontan circulation.

Materials and methods: To perform this single-center, retrospective study, we identified patients with Fontan circulation who underwent clinical abdominal ultrasound and MRI examinations within ±12 months between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023. Imaging reports were reviewed for the presence of liver lesions (specifically noting lesions >1 cm and radiologist-indicated suspicious lesions), features of portal hypertension (ie, presence of ascites and spleen length), abnormal liver contour, and liver stiffness. Intermodality agreement, sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound relative to MRI, and Spearman correlation were used to compare ultrasound and MRI measurements. Follow-up of detected lesions was also performed using electronic health records.

Results: There were 58 patients included. Agreement between MRI and ultrasound for the findings of Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) was as follows: presence of a liver lesion of any size [k = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.32)], presence of a liver lesion >1 cm [k = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.68)], radiologist-indicated suspicious liver lesion(s) [k = 0.07 (95% CI: -0.13 to 0.27)], presence of ascites [k = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.81)], abnormal liver contour [k = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.59)], and spleen length [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.92)]. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound using MRI as the reference standard were as follows: 34% (95% CI: 20% to 50%) and 100% (95% CI: 77% to 100%) for the presence of a liver lesion of any size, and 39% (95% CI: 17% to 64%) and 98% (95% CI: 87% to 100%) for the presence of a liver lesion >1 cm. There was a poor correlation between ultrasound and MRI liver stiffness measurements [rho = 0.22 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.53); P = 0.23]. Of 44 patients with liver lesions, 3 (6.8%) had biopsy-confirmed hepatocellular neoplasms, including 2 adenomas and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma. All 3 lesions were detected by both MRI and ultrasound.

Conclusions: There is poor to fair agreement between ultrasound and MRI for detecting manifestations of FALD, with ultrasound having poor sensitivity compared with MRI. While ultrasound detected all 3 clinically important liver lesions in our study, our results raise questions about whether ultrasound is an appropriate screening tool for FALD in patients post-Fontan.

方丹相关肝病监测个体超声- mri一致性
目的:评价腹部超声与MRI对方坦循环患者局灶性肝脏病变及门静脉高压症表现的一致性。材料和方法:为了进行这项单中心回顾性研究,我们确定了2018年1月1日至2023年6月30日±12个月内接受临床腹部超声和MRI检查的Fontan循环患者。检查影像学报告是否存在肝脏病变(特别注意bbb1cm的病变和放射科指示的可疑病变)、门静脉高压症的特征(即腹水和脾脏长度的存在)、肝脏轮廓异常和肝脏僵硬。采用多模态一致性、超声相对于MRI的敏感性和特异性以及Spearman相关性来比较超声和MRI测量结果。使用电子健康记录对检测到的病变进行随访。结果:共纳入58例患者。协议MRI和超声的结果Fontan-associated肝病(FALD)如下:肝脏病变的存在任何大小(k = 0.20(95%置信区间CI: 0.08 - 0.32)],存在肝脏病变> 1厘米(k = 0.43(95%置信区间CI: 0.18 - 0.68)], radiologist-indicated可疑肝损伤(s) (k = 0.07(95%置信区间CI: -0.13 - 0.27)],存在腹水(k = 0.57(95%置信区间CI: 0.32 - 0.81)],异常肝脏轮廓(k = 0.31(95%置信区间CI:0.03 ~ 0.59)]和脾脏长度[类内相关系数= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.58 ~ 0.92)]。超声以MRI为参考标准的灵敏度和特异性分别为:对于任何大小的肝脏病变,其灵敏度和特异性分别为34% (95% CI: 20% ~ 50%)和100% (95% CI: 77% ~ 100%);对于bbb10 ~ 1cm的肝脏病变,其灵敏度和特异性分别为39% (95% CI: 17% ~ 64%)和98% (95% CI: 87% ~ 100%)。超声和MRI肝硬度测量之间的相关性较差[rho = 0.22 (95% CI: -0.14至0.53);P = 0.23]。44例肝脏病变患者中,3例(6.8%)活检证实肝细胞肿瘤,包括2例腺瘤和1例肝细胞癌。3例病变均行MRI及超声检查。结论:超声与MRI在诊断FALD表现上的一致性较差,与MRI相比,超声的敏感性较差。虽然超声在我们的研究中检测到所有3个临床重要的肝脏病变,但我们的结果提出了超声是否适合用于fontan后患者的FALD筛查工具的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信