Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Paripoorna Bhat, Vijay Shree Dhyani, Vani Lakshmi, Shubhashree Uppangala, Satish Kumar Adiga, Prashanth Adiga, Pratap Kumar, Aditi Gupta
{"title":"Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Paripoorna Bhat, Vijay Shree Dhyani, Vani Lakshmi, Shubhashree Uppangala, Satish Kumar Adiga, Prashanth Adiga, Pratap Kumar, Aditi Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03454-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital anomalies (CAs) are a leading cause of perinatal and child mortality. With the increasing use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), there is a growing need for research on the health outcomes of children conceived through ART. This systematic review was performed to assess the incidence of CAs in ART-conceived children compared to those conceived naturally. This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. A total of 113 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 768,929 children in the ART group and 40,709,337 children in the control group which comprised spontaneously conceived (SC) children. The primary findings indicated that ART-conceived children have a marginally higher risk of CAs compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that children conceived via ICSI, Day 3 transfer, and fresh embryo transfer (ET) had a slightly higher risk of CAs than those conceived via IVF, Day 5 transfer, or frozen embryo transfer (FET). The study highlights a slightly increased incidence of CAs among ART-conceived children over SC children, underscoring the importance of improving ART methods and closely monitoring the health of these children to reduce the risk of CAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1547-1565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03454-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congenital anomalies (CAs) are a leading cause of perinatal and child mortality. With the increasing use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), there is a growing need for research on the health outcomes of children conceived through ART. This systematic review was performed to assess the incidence of CAs in ART-conceived children compared to those conceived naturally. This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. A total of 113 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 768,929 children in the ART group and 40,709,337 children in the control group which comprised spontaneously conceived (SC) children. The primary findings indicated that ART-conceived children have a marginally higher risk of CAs compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that children conceived via ICSI, Day 3 transfer, and fresh embryo transfer (ET) had a slightly higher risk of CAs than those conceived via IVF, Day 5 transfer, or frozen embryo transfer (FET). The study highlights a slightly increased incidence of CAs among ART-conceived children over SC children, underscoring the importance of improving ART methods and closely monitoring the health of these children to reduce the risk of CAs.

在通过辅助生殖技术受孕的儿童中观察到先天性异常——系统回顾和荟萃分析。
先天性异常(CAs)是围产期和儿童死亡的主要原因。随着越来越多地使用辅助生殖技术,越来越需要对通过辅助生殖技术受孕的儿童的健康结果进行研究。本系统综述旨在评估art受孕儿童与自然受孕儿童的CAs发生率。本次审查遵循PRISMA 2020指南,并在PROSPERO注册。该荟萃分析共纳入113项研究,包括ART组768,929名儿童和对照组40,709,337名儿童,其中包括自然受孕(SC)儿童。初步发现表明,与对照组相比,接受art治疗的儿童患ca的风险略高。亚组分析显示,通过ICSI、第3天移植和新鲜胚胎移植(ET)受孕的儿童比通过体外受精(IVF)、第5天移植或冷冻胚胎移植(FET)受孕的儿童发生CAs的风险略高。该研究强调,在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的儿童中,与SC儿童相比,ca的发生率略有增加,这强调了改进抗逆转录病毒治疗方法和密切监测这些儿童的健康状况以降低ca风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信