Comprehensive Literature Review Evaluating the Use, Safety, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Methotrexate in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Manuelle Viguier, José-Manuel Carrascosa-Carrillo, Pariyawan Rakvit, Maria-Magdalena Constantin, Alice-Anaïs Varlet, Solenn Le Clanche, Linda A W Verhagen, Wolf-Henning Boehncke
{"title":"Comprehensive Literature Review Evaluating the Use, Safety, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Methotrexate in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis.","authors":"Manuelle Viguier, José-Manuel Carrascosa-Carrillo, Pariyawan Rakvit, Maria-Magdalena Constantin, Alice-Anaïs Varlet, Solenn Le Clanche, Linda A W Verhagen, Wolf-Henning Boehncke","doi":"10.1111/ijd.17758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methotrexate (MTX) is a conventional systemic therapy widely used to treat chronic plaque-type psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. MTX can be administered orally or subcutaneously. Over the past decades, the use of subcutaneous versus oral MTX has been a subject of ongoing debate among dermatologists. Therefore, this literature review aimed to investigate the differences between oral and subcutaneous MTX described in the scientific literature in terms of intestinal absorption and bioavailability, efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction and quality of life, treatment adherence, and economic outlook. Thirty-two articles were included in the review, notably including evidence-based guidelines on the management of psoriasis, as well as randomized clinical trials and real-world studies. Only European guidelines recommend the use of subcutaneous MTX over oral MTX; hence, the use of subcutaneous MTX is reported almost exclusively in European countries. Despite the paucity and heterogeneity of the literature, findings from the review suggest that subcutaneous MTX may overcome some limitations of the oral route in terms of intestinal absorption, bioavailability, and safety. Moreover, subcutaneous MTX may provide higher efficacy with a faster, or even greater, response in psoriatic patients and better adherence to treatment. In conclusion, subcutaneous MTX tends to be advantageous with regard to psoriasis management, similar to other chronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis; however, this comes with a higher cost. The treatment of psoriasis using subcutaneous MTX deserves further study, especially in the biologics age.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is a conventional systemic therapy widely used to treat chronic plaque-type psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. MTX can be administered orally or subcutaneously. Over the past decades, the use of subcutaneous versus oral MTX has been a subject of ongoing debate among dermatologists. Therefore, this literature review aimed to investigate the differences between oral and subcutaneous MTX described in the scientific literature in terms of intestinal absorption and bioavailability, efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction and quality of life, treatment adherence, and economic outlook. Thirty-two articles were included in the review, notably including evidence-based guidelines on the management of psoriasis, as well as randomized clinical trials and real-world studies. Only European guidelines recommend the use of subcutaneous MTX over oral MTX; hence, the use of subcutaneous MTX is reported almost exclusively in European countries. Despite the paucity and heterogeneity of the literature, findings from the review suggest that subcutaneous MTX may overcome some limitations of the oral route in terms of intestinal absorption, bioavailability, and safety. Moreover, subcutaneous MTX may provide higher efficacy with a faster, or even greater, response in psoriatic patients and better adherence to treatment. In conclusion, subcutaneous MTX tends to be advantageous with regard to psoriasis management, similar to other chronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis; however, this comes with a higher cost. The treatment of psoriasis using subcutaneous MTX deserves further study, especially in the biologics age.

综合文献综述:评价甲氨蝶呤皮下注射治疗成人中重度斑块型银屑病的使用、安全性和有效性。
甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是一种常规的全身疗法,广泛用于治疗慢性斑块型银屑病,这是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,严重影响患者的生活质量。甲氨蝶呤可口服或皮下给药。在过去的几十年里,皮下注射还是口服甲氨蝶呤一直是皮肤科医生争论不休的话题。因此,本文献综述旨在探讨科学文献中口服和皮下MTX在肠道吸收和生物利用度、疗效、安全性、患者满意度和生活质量、治疗依从性和经济前景方面的差异。该综述纳入了32篇文章,主要包括银屑病治疗的循证指南,以及随机临床试验和现实世界的研究。只有欧洲指南建议使用皮下MTX而不是口服MTX;因此,使用皮下甲氨蝶呤的报道几乎完全在欧洲国家。尽管文献的缺乏和异质性,但综述的结果表明,在肠道吸收、生物利用度和安全性方面,皮下注射MTX可能克服口服途径的一些局限性。此外,皮下MTX可能提供更高的疗效,银屑病患者更快,甚至更大的反应和更好的治疗依从性。总之,与类风湿关节炎等其他慢性炎症性疾病类似,皮下甲氨蝶呤治疗牛皮癣是有利的;然而,这带来了更高的成本。皮下注射甲氨蝶呤治疗银屑病值得进一步研究,特别是在生物制剂时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
476
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education. The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信